(Pro) being a supporter of homosexuality, it IS NOT inconsistent that (pro) DOES NOT support incest at all.

The people on the sidelines can tout all this stuff but can never refute what I say. My irrefutable points hits so hard, the ones crying brain damage suffer from brain damage from my irrefutable blows .

I digress.

I have spoken with many individuals that support homosexuality but will not support incest.

That is until I establish the inconsistencies and they concede their support and acceptance of close relative sexual relationships.

If you support same gender sexual relationships, the same basis can be given for incestuous folks.

For those that were obtuse and confused, let that sink in and help you out. If you don't understand a thing, it's best to stay out of it.

So I'm going to turn it over to the opposing side that will be showing you can't support both the same and it wouldn't inconsistent not to.

Ok so the opposing side so called actually agrees with my stance .

I rest my case.

"Differences between incest and homosexuality

Incest often arises from coercion and power imbalance (1)

Incest leads to potentially life-ruining genetic diseases (1)

Incest is shown to damage mental health (2)

These are all major problems that do not arise from homosexuality. Because of that fact it is reasonable for me to support homosexuality and not incest."

The first point can be true in homosexual parties. The incestuous folks can be same sex.

So because it's not every case with incest, like it's not every case with homosexuality, the support can work the same for both. As you mentioned "often arises" indirectly says not all cases.

The second point is not necessarily. Just like homosexuality doesn't necessarily lead to sexual transmitted diseases, stigmatizations, demonizations and unfair discrimination.

Which could attribute to the next point about mental health.

So quite frankly and straightforwardly, we can't say all situations are the same, we can't say all have the same result.

"All I must prove is that it can be reasonable to support homosexuality and not support incest, or as you would say; you can't support both the same and it wouldn't inconsistent not to."

Yes the point is consistency . What's reasonable tends to be subjective.

"I don't quite see what your getting at. Sure, it can be true in any relationship, but it is much more problematic with incest. And if that scenario you mention happened, I would simply would not support the incest aspect."

So as long as there's no coercion, you support incest.

"Sure, it's not absolute incest will create a crippling genetic disease but that doesn't make the problem go away."

So you can support sterile /homosexual incest parties.

"Homosexuality is not shown to cause mental health issues, and though incest doesn't always lead to depression and other issues later in life it's still a major problem. Eating Uranium isn't okay even if there's a chance it doesn't kill you."

People don't come out the classic closet because of mental bombardment and for the sake of sanity and non embarrassment. If people can accept incest like homosexuality, all these folks can have peace and live and love comfortably.

So this means you support good healthy incestuous folks.

"In summary, the effects of incest are much worse than the effects of homosexuality, which makes it reasonable to support one but not the other. They are different things, and therefore they should be treated as such."

Consensual parties of incest can have the same support of consensual homosexual parties and those incestuous parties can be homosexual.

There really is no difference but just trumped up excuses to be against incest outright that conflicts with the basis of supporting homosexuality as the common denominator can be linked betwen the too.

Now because incest has not been socially accepted to the progressive level of the LGBT and perhaps the lack of exploring acceptance and resolving the reservations, the average person will dismiss incest as they used to with homosexuality.

"My opponent's argument now relies on certain exceptions and theoreticals that make incest similar to homosexuality. The reality is that homosexuality and incest are fundamentally different things, and therefore must be judged differently.

Granted, there may be outliers that may make incest less harmful is certain areas, but this does not mean those who support homosexuality have a rational obligation to be okay with incest."

This is a very simple equation which I don't know if the opposing side really doesn't comprehend or the struggle to play opposition's advocate to the most desperate degree .

If you support consensual same sex adult relationships, why drop your support if it's incestuous?

This is what the opposite side will not or has not addressed. As it would mean you would support both incest and homosexuality because both can co-exist.

Really case closed there.

"Con also argues that in a theoretical world the societal dislike of incest could just disappear, and by exstention disappear the damage to mental well being caused by incest. This argument is irrelevant because we simply do not live in such a world."

I don't believe I said anything about a theory. Anything such as mental well being that you want to say about what comes with incest also has occurred with the l.g.b.t community. The opposite side did not address the "coming out closet" phenomenon.

The whole story with that was because of societal acceptance and avoiding mental , life, health and wellness taxation. Which the acceptance has changed probably due to conversations for open-mindedness.

Now people that continue to reject this just prolong the progress to acceptance. All factual, non theoretical. No direction to go in but acceptance when you only have the two to go from and to, reject or accept.

"Con, who I think has the burden of proof(?), has thus far not been able to demonstrate why one must support incest if one supports homosexuality, two entirely different things. On the other hand, I have highlighted several major differences, among many, that make it more than reasonable to support only homosexuality."

I'll reiterate:

This is a very simple equation which I don't know if the opposing side really doesn't comprehend or the struggle to play opposition's advocate to the most desperate degree .

If you support consensual same sex adult relationships, why drop your support if it's incestuous?

This is what the opposite side will not or has not addressed. As it would mean you would support both incest and homosexuality because both can co-exist.

Thank you.