Should children allow themselves to be socially transgendered?

We look at the legal structure. Whether you want to say "rights" , what is allowed by law or "stipulations", what is mandated by law, minors require guardianship.

First off no minor has right to anything to supercede parental/guardianship representation. Not withstanding certain legal declarations which would be irrelevant on top of that.

Outside or away from those declarations, at large , no minor has any right to supercede legally an adult.

So in light of that, it is the adult, the authorities, authoritative representatives that have the right, duty and onus to judge and decide for the welfare of minors .

It's by decision of the guardian and or parent to allow anything of their dependents.

Which may allow said social behaviors.

"There is no legal requirement that needs to be fulfilled for a children to be socially transgendered. They don't need legal approval from a parent.

They don't need legal approval from a parent."

Getting it backwards. It's not about a legal requirement. The parents legally have authority to decide and take responsibility in all their children's affairs.....well... because..... their children . Their children have been legally placed in the care of guardians whereas they are legally delegated to by government the responsibility to be representative, to guard and be entrusted with sole rearing.

Children need not to give themselves legal approval, but just approval, just approval from their guardians like anything else their children are involved in because the guardians are the sole authority.

It's really as straightforward as that.

The topic is not saying children don't or shouldn't have autonomy. I understand and predicted it be interpreted that way.

All the topic is reiterating is that children get approval from their parents . The minors have the authorities over them. Just a simple setup of our society. A child gets an approval about his or her allowed behavior like any other behavior. Which could be socially one gender over the other or acting unruly over behaving disciplined.

The topic is "Should children allow themselves to be socially transgendered?"

See, if the opposing side didn't allow the keywords to fall by the wayside, what could be seen is something straightforward non controversial.

The keywords are "allow themselves".

But the opposite side is distracted by autonomy.

The basic relationship structure between minors and adults in society is approval of one over the other's affairs and welfare.

This is general parental structure. So in general, children or minors don't allow themselves to do anything without parental guidance bestowed on to parents mandated.

Anything, anything, anything that a child does brings to question of the responsibility of whom the child is in care of. So we have things such as child endangerment, child neglect and child welfare investigations.

If the mandate is not upheld or enforced, social services/child protective services are involved.

This is straightforward and the topic was glossed over. I predicted that someone would miss the keys. Perhaps many didn't and stayed away .

I rest my case.

Really case closed.

My points have not been addressed, have not been refuted.

The opposing side is just reiterating in basic terms , children should have , possess , decide things of their own autonomy.

Essentially be their own parents. Which is utter nonsense. The law doesn't recognize minors as adults and total responsibility for children to be allowed anything is by an adult figure period.

I understand the opposing side is attempting to persist this delusional talking point but it is totally unrealistic and not sound. Instead of facing that, admitting that, this delusion is perpetuated. That's why none of my points are being responded to.

It's just "children should allow themselves" , the end.

It is the end of the debate.