Weird means different from what is common. But what is common is in large amount, also is repetitive, and thus boring. When something is in large amount, its value drops. If you do same thing over and over, it gets boring.
Round 1
1 of 1Hello SatanLucy,
I see your argument and it makes sense, however i think there is a flaw in The statement "if you aren't weird, you are boring" So i would like to give u a Argument against it.
As you Stated "Weird means different from what is common."
That is a fact and is true, but when is something weird for who? If i think about it myself, then i am weird because i am debating on a Website, for others is this not weird and normal.
Here we see the Problem. in todays World many things seem normal, though for some People that particular thing is weird. I like a particular game, i got called weird (or other words similar to that) for liking it multiple times. (not in Terms of it being creepy, it is just not well made) but for me and the Community it is completely normal for us. So we are boring in the sight of others, though we enjoy it.
The biggest Problem with the Statement is, that it is subjective to what is normal and what is weird.
For you, it may be like that, but for me u may be boring, because u act different then others.
I don't want to repeat my Argument here, but how many times do we see others doing different things, behaving differently and are boring in most people Eyes.
Argument from the Others side: If we thing about LGBTQ+ Community. In my eyes they are normal and still Interesting to me. but the other side which is "Weird" is totally uninteresting for me.
You can see, i talk about me. That is because everyone themselves has to decide what is boring for them and what not. It heavely depends on where you come from, how you are living, how your social field is and so on. To many Values to get into.
So dear Pro Argument Person, Readers and Voters. I would say this one should be a draw, as this Argument can not have a real winner.
We are all Normal, but there is a certain weirdness within us all.
Thank you for listening,
Mika
| Criterion | Pro | Tie | Con |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winner |
That said, Pro's singular argument also begged for content, establishing an either/or argument, such as: X is good, Y is bad, or, specifically, weird is good, bored is bad.
Con's rebuttal introduced the substance needed: "The biggest Problem with the [Pro] Statement is, that it is subjective to what is normal and what is weird. This directly goes to definition, which Pro's challenge completely lacked, because the Resolve points to people, who, by Pro's lack of a Description [containing background, definition, and substance] are considered merely as repetitive [his word] cardboard cutout figures who all think the same thoughts, conduct the same actions, and view the world in black and white, or, more correctly, only one of the two options. But Con's rebuttal fleshes out the cardboard, and we see the individuals with their variable thoughts and actions, specifically with regard to what "weird" and "boring" are and represent.
Con wins.