The Hebrew Bible teaches that Satan / Devil is a fallen angel

Voting religion

The participant with the most points wins.

Voting stays open until 3 more votes are cast.

Like this debate? Score 0
···
X Facebook
Con Instigator Opens first
Instigator Avatar
0
Rating
1574
Debates
30
Win rate
66.67%

Match format

Type
Rated · 3 rounds
Time
Two weeks
Limit
10,000
Vote
Two weeks · 3 votes to close
Pro Contender
Contender Avatar
0
Rating
1707
Debates
84
Win rate
70.83%

Thank you, fauxlaw, for agreeing to debate me on this topic. In this debate, I will quite literally be the devil's advocate and show that Satan is not a fallen angel.

Definitions

Satan - In Hebrew the word satan literally means an adversary / opposer. In Christian mythology this figure, sometimes called lucifer or the devil, was a created angel who led a rebellion of angels and became a fallen angel / demon. As my opponent is part of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, I will present the definition of Satan from them:

Satan, also called the adversary or the devil, is the enemy of all righteousness and of those who seek to follow God. He is a spirit son of God who was once an angel “in authority in the presence of God.”1 But in the premortal Council in Heaven, Lucifer, as Satan was then called, rebelled against God. Since that time, he has sought to destroy the children of God on the earth and to make them miserable.

Source: https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/satan?lang=eng

The Hebrew Bible - The Hebrew Bible (aka the T'nakh or the Christian Old Testament) will be defined as the 24 books (according to Jewish counting 39 according to Protestant Christian counting) of the Hebrew Bible. This corresponds to the protestant Christian Old Testament cannon of scripture. The Catholic apocryphal / deuterocanonical books are excluded from this definition.

Debate Structure

Round 1: Opening arguments only

Round 2: Rebuttals

Round 3: Defense

Round 4: Rebuttals / Close

Debate Terms

The time to argue is 2 weeks and the maximum character count is 10,000. The use of AI is banned in this debate except for creation of images or visuals.

Thank you and good luck to my opponent!




Round 1

1 of 3
avatar
Kohai Administrator
Con #1

*Note: This is redo of a previous debate. These rounds are copied and pasted. No new edits are allowed*

Thank you, fauxlaw, for this debate. I am happy to play devil's advocate - literally! In this debate I will be defending the devil, lucifer, satan, the prince of darkness etc. and show that he is not an independent force of evil, but rather a servant of God.

Intro to Jewish Theology

I will be approaching this debate from a traditional Jewish perspective. It is important to note that Judaism is a strictly monotheistic religion. Jewish theology states unequivocally that there is only One God in all of existence. Besides Him no other god was created or will be created. In addition, God is in complete control over all of creation and there is no independent forces that opposes Him.

In contrast, Christian theology proposes that God composed of three persons and there is Satan, an independent force of evil that rebelled against God. This contrasts even further with LDS theology that says that God is one in a long line of infinite regress of gods. With that intro out of the way, let's dive right in.

1. Who or what is Satan?

The word satan comes from the Hebrew word שטן, which literally means an adversary or opposer. In the entirety of Sefer Tenakh (The Hebrew Bible), the root שטן appears only 27 times [1] and all but four times does it refer to a human opponent. There are only four places in all of Tenakh where Satan is used as a cosmic enemy such as an angel: Numbers, Zechariah, Job, and Chronicles [2] and only 3 of which are clearly HaSatan (The Satan). This is actually a significant observation because if Satan was a fallen angel and an independent force of evil that opposes God one would think that Satan would appear significantly more frequently than only 4 times. Let's explore each of these appearances

1. Numbers 22:22

For context: This is from Parshat Balaak where Balaak sends Bilaam to curse the Israelites. Instead of cursing the Israelites he blesses them. In Numbers 22:22 an angel is dispatched to oppose Balaam:

כבוַיִּֽחַר־אַ֣ף אֱלֹהִים֘ כִּֽי־הוֹלֵ֣ךְ הוּא֒ וַיִּתְיַצֵּ֞ב מַלְאַ֧ךְ יְהֹוָ֛ה בַּדֶּ֖רֶךְ לְשָׂטָ֣ן ל֑וֹ וְהוּא֙ רֹכֵ֣ב עַל־אֲתֹנ֔וֹ וּשְׁנֵ֥י נְעָרָ֖יו עִמּֽוֹ:

Literally translated as: "And Elohim's anger burned because he (Balam) was going, and an angel of Adonai stationed himself on the path to be an adversary to him...

In this case we can see the an angel, who is clearly not God's adversary, being described as a שטן because of his opposition to Balaam. The angel is simply functioning as a a roadblock to Balaam.

2. Zechariah 3

The next place we see satan it is preceded by the definitive article Ha, meaning The satan or the adversary:

בוַיֹּ֨אמֶר יְהֹוָ֜ה אֶל־הַשָּׂטָ֗ן יִגְעַ֨ר יְהֹוָ֚ה בְּךָ֙ הַשָּׂטָ֔ן וְיִגְעַ֚ר יְהֹוָה֙ בְּךָ֔ הַבֹּחֵ֖ר בִּירֽוּשָׁלִָ֑ם הֲל֧וֹא זֶ֥ה֥ א֖וּד מֻצָּ֥ל מֵאֵֽשׁ:

"And Adonai said to the adversary (heb the satan), 'Adonai shall rebuke you, o adversary, and Adonai shall rebuke you."

In this scene Satan is appearing before the divine court accusing Joshua of being unworthy of being the high priest. The Lord rejects Satan's arguments and states that Joshua is worthy. In this scene Satan is clearly not an enemy of God, but rather a prosecutor doing his job.

3. The Book of Job

Throughout the Book of Job Satan tests Job's relationship with God. The opening of the book is quite striking:

Now the day came about, and the angels of God came to stand beside the Lord, and the Adversary, too, came among them. The Lord said to the Adversary, "Where are you coming from?" And the Adversary answered the Lord and said, "From going to and fro on the earth and from walking in it." Now the Lord said to the Adversary, "Have you paid attention to My servant Job? For there is none like him on earth, a sincere and upright man, God-fearing and shunning evil."And the Adversary answered the Lord and said, "Does Job fear God for nothing? Haven't You made a hedge around him, his household, and all that he has on all sides? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his livestock has spread out in the land. But now, stretch forth Your hand and touch all that he has, will he not blaspheme You to Your face?" Now the Lord said to the Adversary, "Behold, all that he has is in your hands; only upon him do not stretch forth your hand." Now the Adversary left the presence of the Lord.

Job paints a picture of the heavenly court in session. The session opens up by God asking The Satan where are you coming from. This opening question is an invite to satan to articulate his role and intentions. The satan's response highlights his role as the observer of humanity, the prosecutor of their sins, and God's instrument in testing people's faith. God then invites him into considering Job and invites him into prosecuting him.

This is a very strange puzzle. If Satan is this cosmic force of evil independent of God, then why is God allowing him to sit in this heavenly court? In addition, why does God tell Satan the person God wants to test?

4. Chronicles

The final place Satan appears is in the final book of the Bible, Chronicles. 1 Chronicles 21:1 opens up: וַיַּֽעֲמֹ֥ד שָׂטָ֖ן עַל־יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל וַיָּ֙סֶת֙ אֶת־דָּוִ֔יד לִמְנ֖וֹת אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵֽל

And an adversary (heb a satan, note the lack of the definitive article) stood against (literally upon) Israel and he incited David to count the Israelites.

Skeptics rightly point out that there is a blatant contradiction between how the Chronicler portrays this event vs how Samuel portrays this event. Samuel states:

אוַיֹּ֙סֶף֙ אַף־יְהֹוָ֔ה לַחֲר֖וֹת בְּיִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל וַיָּ֨סֶת אֶת־דָּוִ֚ד בָּהֶם֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר לֵ֛ךְ מְנֵ֥ה אֶת־יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל וְאֶת־יְהוּדָֽה:

And again the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel and He moved David against them, saying, "Go count Israel and Judah

There appears to be a contradiction here; however, both Christian and Jewish scholars argue the same thing: God ultimately used satan for this task. God gives us free will and gives us the ability to choose what to do with it. I'll have more to say in the next round about this topic of God's anger and how these issues are actually understood in Jewish theology.

Conclusion

I apologize as this argument was extremely rushed. I was so busy for the holidays that I almost forgot this debate existed.

Sources

1. https://biblehub.com/hebrew/strongs_7854.htm

2. I listed these in order of appearance in the Hebrew Bible. The Hebrew Bible is ordered differently than in most Christian Bibles. 


avatar
fauxlaw Global Moderator
Pro #2

In consideration: Resolved: The Hebrew Bible teaches that Satan / Devil is a fallen angel


Thank you, Kohai, for this debate. I look forward to a challenging and satisfying experience for both of us. For this debate, though more familiar with the King 

James Version [KJV], I will use the New American Standard Bible [NASB] in this debate, in keeping with Pro's preferred Protestant translation.


I Argument: Lucifer: "I will ascend into heaven," Hebrew Bible, Book of Genesis


I.a Isaiah, an 8th century B.C.E. prophet, declared of Lucifer,

“They will all respond and say to you, ‘Even you have become weak as we, You have become like us.

‘Your pride and the music of your harps have been brought down to Sheol; Maggots are spread out as your bed beneath you and worms are your covering.’

“How you have fallen from heaven, You star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the earth, you who defeated the nations!

“But you said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God, and I will sit on the mount of assembly In the recesses of the north.

"I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.

“Nevertheless you will be brought down to Sheol, to the recesses of the pit."[1]


I.a.1 "Lucifer" is the translated-to-Latin [some say mis-translated] name of the Devil from ancient Hebrew, הֵילֵ֣ל [hê-lêl][2], a.k.a. "son of the dawn"[3], or "star of the morning"[3], and other names. 


I.a.2 The word "satan" functioned as a generic noun or verb [an adversary to another, or to oppose someone][4] such as noted in Numbers: "But God was angry that he was going, and the angel of the LORD took his stand in the road as an adversary against him..."[5] In Hebrew, the word is rendered as: לְשָׂטָ֣ן[ha-sa-tan: an adversary; 'ha" being an article in function, as in "the adversary"].


I.b The inference of Isaiah's text is that Lucifer [Satan] was once a part of heaven before the world was, but, during which, he became jealous of God and privately determined to replace him and claim heaven as his own.[4] 



I.c In reference to the Isaiah source[1], and Satan's declaration, "I will raise my throne above the stars of God," Satan is doing no less than declaring his intent to destroy the purpose of creation, itself, i.e., to render "...the heavens and the earth,"[7] and of creation of man, said by God to be “...in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the livestock and over all the earth, and over every crawling thing that crawls on the earth.”[8]


I.c.1 For man to have dominion of all the earth and its living organisms was an awesome responsibility that Satan, himself, wanted to usurp for himself, in addition to "raising his throne above the stars of God." Satan wanted all for himself, thus declaring himself no less than the enemy of God [as Numbers declares, "took his stand in the road as an adversary against him..."[5] [§I.a.2] by his desire to be greater than God and all of God's creations & purposes.


I.c.2 For this satanic declaration, according to Isaiah, when Satan and his minions were cast down from heaven, Isaiah laments "How you have fallen from heaven... You have been cut down to the earth[1]


I.d Therefore, it is consistent with my BoP to declare by these arguments, R1, § I - I.c.2, that the Hebrew Bible teaches that Satan/Devil is a fallen angel; the declaration of the Resolve.


II Argument: Hebrew Bible, Book of Genesis confirmation that Satan is fallen from heaven


II.a Long before Isaiah, an event occurred prior to Adam & Eve's [A&E] banishment from Eden. How and by what? A&E would experience, by Satan's declaration "You will not die...your eyes will be opened, and you will become like God, knowing good and evil.”[10] What is "become like God," since A&E were not yet even mortals in Eden, but we share in that in the Edenless, mortal state today, and we share the same capability to "become like God" as confirmed by no less a source for A&E than Satan, in spite of himself. It was Satan saying that such "become like God;" is a transformation of becoming; by "...knowing good and evil." At that point in time, in Eden, A&E lacked such knowledge.


II.a.1 What is knowledge?" Need we really define it? Certainly at a root, knowledge of good and evil is a beginning point, because that implies all manner of opposites; truth and lie, satisfaction and hunger, peace and war, order and chaos... these dichotomies are necessary to our understanding of such complexities in order to have valid "dominion of the Earth," granted to A&E, and, therefore, following in successive generations, to us.


II.b Satan's fall from heaven, and therefore, fall from the presence of God landed him in misery, also banished from Eden. Misery loves company, it is said, and thus, Satan is a fallen angel, continuing his effort of deception by telling us, as to A&E, just enough truth to entrap our efforts to "become like God," which really is: perfect and eternal, and dominion in heaven with God, achieved by our learning the method and purpose of dominion of Earth.


III Argument: Hebrew Bible, Book of Job confirmation that Satan is fallen from heaven


III.a The chronology of the Book of Job is difficult to determine among the books of the Old Testament, the "Hebrew Bible," and even whether Job is an historic entity or simply an allegory, only. In any event, sometime following the banishment from Eden:

"Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan [הַשָּׂטָ֖ן - ha-sa-tan - the adversary] also came among them.

"And the Lord said to Satan, 'From where do you come?' So Satan answered the Lord and said, 'From going to and fro on the earth, and from walking back and forth on it.'

"The Lord said to Satan, 'Have you considered My servant Job? For there is no one like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, fearing God and turning away from evil.'”[11]


III.b One of the reasons why Job is considered allegory rather than history is because, being banished from heaven before the creation, Satan was never to return there, yet, either here he is, an interloper to this grouping of "the sons of God," "presenting themselves" before God, or, this portion of the story is not occurring in heaven. We don't know which. We depend on other books of the Hebrew Bible to teach us that Satan, once in heaven as depicted by Isaiah, cited above [§I.a - I.d], has fallen to Earth.


IV Argument: Hebrew Bible Genesis confirmation that Satan is fallen from heaven


IV.a By extension from III.b, above, clearly, God can remove himself from heaven as needed, such as in personally visiting A&E in Eden: "Now they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees of the garden."[12] Also in subsequent verses, God speaks to Eve, Adam, and Satan, so he is there, and they relate to him when all are there together in the Eden, which is not in heaven, but part of Earth, their various perspectives of their separate activities. If Eden is not part of Earth, why, then, is an angel set in the way such that A&E [and Satan] are prevented from returning there? "So He drove the man out; and at the east of the Garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim and the flaming sword which turned every direction to guard the way to the tree of life."[13]


IV.a.1 Simple logic would tell us that Eden was Earth-bound because we are told

"And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it"[14]


IV.b By these 4 arguments, Isaiah, Genesis, Job, and another Genesis, I have upheld the BoP of the Resolve that The Hebrew Bible teaches that Satan / Devil is a fallen angel.



I pass R2 to Con.



R1 Sources:


[1] Holy Bible [NASB] Isaiah 14: 10-15

[2] https://biblehub.com/text/isaiah/14-12.htm

[3] Holy Bible [NASB] Isaiah 14: 12

[4] https://www.1517.org/articles/the-devil-in-the-details-of-the-old-testament-is-satan-in-the-hebrew-bible

[5] Holy Bible [NASB] Numbers 22: 22

[6] deleted

[7] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 1: 1

[8] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 1: 26

[9] Holy Bible [NASB] Isaiah 14: 12

[10] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 3: 4, 5

[11] Holy Bible [NASB] Job 1: 6-8

[12] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 3: 8

[13] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 3: 24

[14] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 2: 8


Round 2

2 of 3
avatar
Kohai Administrator
Con #3

Thank you, Fauxlaw, for your reply. I am sorry for the rushed and late response. I have been extremely busy with the holidays.

I Argument: Lucifer: "I will ascend into heaven," Hebrew Bible, Book of Genesis

My opponent cites the famous passage in Isaiah 14: 10-15. The problem is from the context it is clear that this is not about Satan. The prophecy is an oracle about Babylon. Isaiah makes this extremely clear in v 4:

And you shall bear this parable against the king of Babylon, and you shall say, "How has the dominator ceased, has ceased the haughty one!

The text has absolutely nothing to do with Satan at all. The New English Translation's study notes confirms this:

tn The Hebrew text has הֵילֵל בֶּן־שָׁחַר (helel ben shakhar, “Helel son of Shachar”), which is probably a name for the morning star (Venus) or the crescent moon. See HALOT 245 s.v. הֵילֵל. sn What is the background for the imagery in vv. 12-15? This whole section (vv. 4b-21) is directed to the king of Babylon, who is clearly depicted as a human ruler. Other kings of the earth address him in vv. 9ff., he is called “the man” in v. 16, and, according to vv. 19-20, he possesses a physical body. Nevertheless the language of vv. 12-15 has led some to see a dual referent in the taunt song. These verses, which appear to be spoken by other pagan kings to a pagan king (cf. vv. 9-11), contain several titles and motifs that resemble those of Canaanite mythology, including references to Helel son of Shachar, the stars of El, the mountain of assembly, the recesses of Zaphon, and the divine title Most High. Apparently these verses allude to a mythological story about a minor god (Helel son of Shachar) who tried to take over Zaphon, the mountain of the godsHis attempted coup failed, and he was hurled down to the underworldThe king of Babylon is taunted for having similar unrealized delusions of grandeurSome Christians have seen an allusion to the fall of Satan here, but this seems contextually unwarranted (see J. Martin, “Isaiah,” BKCOT, 1061).

The scholarly consensus of Isaiah 14 is that the passage in question has nothing to do with Satan.

II Argument: Hebrew Bible, Book of Genesis confirmation that Satan is fallen from heaven

All what we see in the text is: "Now the serpent was more cunning than any animal of the field which the Lord God had made..." Nowhere in this text does it even hint or allude to this being satan. Only in much later do we get this idea. It's clear from this text that the serpent is entirely self-contained as a part of God's original creation and not a fallen entity.

That said, I interpret the garden of eden story to be metaphorical and not literal. The way I, and many other Jewish rationalists read this, is that the story is teaching us a profound lesson on ethics and the nature of humanity.

Jewish theology categorically rejects the idea of original sin and rejects the idea of total depravity. Humans are born with a good inclination (yetzar tov) and an evil inclination (yetzar hara). I read this story as the snake being symbolic of this yetzar hara. That said, I'm running low on time and will try and expand on this more in the next round.

III. The LDS Big Blunder

LDS has a very unique theology in that it teaches that both God the Father and God the Son are both physical entities with a physical body. In contrast, Jewish theology categorically rejects the idea of God having a physical body. In Jewish theology God is one and is not physical. In addition, there are many philosophical issues with LDS theology that we can debate more in detail on a later debate.

My opponent writes:

God can remove himself from heaven as needed, such as in personally visiting A&E in Eden

This is the big mistake LDS theologians make. God does not remove himself from heaven as that would be absurd. The statements about God having a "body" (i.e. with an outstreched arm, etc). or God literally walking in the Garden of Eden are not literal.

My opponent does get on thing correct: The Garden of Eden was a physical place on Earth.

Anyway I am out of time and I wanted to get something in for this round. I'm sorry this isn't the best round and I hope I can expand more in the next round. Anything I did not address in this round will be addressed in the next round.

Sources

1. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2014&version=NET



avatar
fauxlaw Global Moderator
Pro #4

In consideration: Resolved: The Hebrew Bible teaches that Satan / Devil is a fallen angel


Thank you, Kohai, for your R2.


IV Rebuttal, Con R1: "Intro to Jewish Theology"

V.a Con wrote in R1, "God is in complete control over all of creation and there is no independent forces that opposes Him." With no source citation for that claim, I rebut by noting it is Con's personal opinion that man, today, does not have free will. However, the Hebrew Bible [the Tanakh, or, the Old Testament [OT]]: "God blessed them; and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.'”[15] God delegated dominion of Earth to man [Con's "control," and the Bible's "subdue" and "rule over"]. I do not use this verse to refer to A&E specifically, but to emphasize dominion of Earth given to man. I maintain Satan is fallen, and, furthermore, will ultimately have dominion of nothing.


V.b The Hebrew Bible is clear that God has a role in determining human affairs. However, it is equally clear that human beings have the ability to choose their thoughts and actions for themselves, and are, thereby, responsiblefor their consequences of choice. Consider: "The LORD God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may freely eat;"[16] but warned in the following verse that choices had consequences. Consider, also, the review of previous verses 16-18 for further understanding of free will. Consider, finally, [Moses speaking to the Israelites in the wilderness after leaving Egypt]: "I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have placed before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. So choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants"[17]


V.c With regard to Con's claim, Rabbi Chanina said, ""if he [the human being] merits it then [G-d says] have dominion, while if he [man] does not merit, then [G-d says] he [man] will be taken down."[18] Further, "...part of human righteousness involves being stewards of the earth [dominion]


V.c.1 "The Midrash says that G-d showed Adam around the Garden of Eden and said, 'Look at my works! See how beautiful they are — how excellent! For your sake I created them all. See to it that you do not spoil and destroy My world; for if you do, there will be no one else to repair it.' Acting righteously thus involves treating the world with utmost respect; for this the human will merit dominion of creation."[19] Dominion, for man, is righteous stewardship of Earth, conditional on the dedication of man to that righteousness while refusing the influence of Satan. But further, whereas Con said, "God is in complete control..." clearly, if man dominates poorly in his given dominion, no one [not even God?] will repair it.[19] 


V.d I conclud that, based on my R1 arguments of Satan's opposition to God, and Rabbi Chanina's cited commentary[18][19], in my §V.c. and V.c.1 above, it follows that man, himself, can choose to oppose his assigned role of righteous dominion of the Earth, and thereby oppose God, or can choose righteous dominion of the Earth. Neither Con nor I will meet our respective BoP of this debate by personal opinion, alone. Since man can oppose God, contrary to Con's opinion from his R1, so can Satan. See rebuttal V, below. I have cited from the Hebrew Bible [R1, sources [1], [5] [7]-[14]] to prove my BoP that "The Hebrew Bible teaches that Satan / Devil is a fallen angel."


V Rebuttal, Con R1: "Who or what is Satan"


V.a Con wrote in R1, "The word satan comes from the Hebrew word שטן, which literally means an adversary or opposer." Then he discusses the number of times "Satan" is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible: 27 times, but notes that, "There are only four places in all of Tenakh where Satan is used as a cosmic enemy such as an angel: Numbers, Zechariah, Job, and Chronicles..." and then quotes from those four biblical references. One concludes that 23 OT references refer to man as an allegory of the evil "satan," but that still leaves 4 references that, in fact, Satan, himself, is a fallen angel by Con admitting Satan is: "...a cosmic enemy such as an angel." Angels, therefore, can be righteous, following God, or evil, following Satan. This is the Resolution, itself, that Satan/Devil is a "fallen angel" since, according to Isaiah [see my R1 ref [1], Isaiah 14: 10-15, “How you have fallen from heaven, You star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the earth..." That is exactly my BoP, that Satan is a fallen angel, and that is straight from the source: the Hebrew Bible. Does it matter how often that is made evident? Once is sufficient. At least four times is better.


VI Rebuttal, Con R2: re; Isaiah 14: 10-15, "from the context it is clear that this is not about Satan"


VI.a I acknowledge the allegorical slant Isaiah may have relative to the Devil, but Isaiah is but 2 of 11 total Hebrew Bible references I made in my R1 argument, and Con did not rebut any of the other references I cited, nor their related arguments. Those arguments stand.


VII Rebuttal, Con R2, II: "I interpret the garden of eden story to be metaphorical and not literal"


VII.a Once again, Con depends upon his own opinion without citation of scholastic evidence. That will will not suffice, particularly with regard to the three other OT references I made [[Pro R1 sources: Genesis [7, 8, 10, 12-14], Numbers [5], and Job [11]]

which are not allegory, oracle, or prophecy, and stipulate that Satan is fallen from heaven.


VIII Rebuttal, Con R2, III; "The LDS Big Blunder"


VIII.a Since the Hebrew Bible makes no mention of LDS theology, nor have I, although I am a member of good standing in that religion, and embrace it, I have made no mention of it in my R1, and object to its mention in this debate since it is beyond Con's stated scope of the Resolve from the Hebrew Bible. I therefore declare foul. I do claim discussion of the whereabouts of Satan is within the Resolve scope, since his location is a matter of the Resolve; i.e., "fallen" from whence? Therefore, discussion of whether or not LDS theology relative to Eden, or anything else, is a "blunder," Con's claim of "LDS blunders" is not a valid subject of this debate. This is my last word on it, and Con's R2 had best be my opponent's last word, as well.


IX Argument: More biblical evidence Satan/Devil is a fallen angel


IX.a Con's R1 argued that Satan has 27 mentions in the Hebrew Bible [OT], as if the count is relevant. That 23 of those mentions may refer to man being the "satan" by allegory, and not Satan, himself, as Con alleged, is not relevant, either if even 1 mention is concerning Satan, the Devil. My R1 rebutted that there are 4 mentions in which "Satan/Devil" is a fallen angel, which is my BoP. I now introduce a 5th Hebrew Bible [Tanakh] mention, by sufficient description to conclude the subject of the verses is not man by allegory, but the Devil by reality. Ezekiel testified that this personage was once on "'the Mountain of God," but was "...turned to ashes upon the earth" Spoken to by Ezekiel in the guise of the King of Tyre. I say "in the guise" because the King of Tyre was a mortal man, not an angel, and not an inhabitant of "the Mountain of God," nor of "Eden" by any debate-allowed scriptural reference: 

"You had the seal of perfection, Full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.

"“You were in Eden, the garden of God; Every precious stone was your covering... 

“You were in Eden, the garden of God; Every precious stone was your covering.

"...You were on the holy mountain of God; You walked in the midst of the stones of fire.

"“You were blameless in your ways From the day you were created Until unrighteousness was found in you.

"...And I destroyed you, O covering cherub, From the midst of the fiery stones.

"You corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor. I threw you to the ground;

"...I have turned you to ashes on the earth In the eyes of all who see you."[20]


IX.b There can be no doubt that Satan was once with God, during creation, as an angel, a "cherub," but by the time Eden was populated with plants and animals and Adam & Eve, Satan was already banished from God's presence to be a dweller on Earth. Thus is my BoP confirmed: Satan, a fallen angel, is an enemy of God, in opposition to God, contrary to Con's R1, §Intro claim, and his R2's rebuttal of my R1.


I pass R3 to Con 


Sources: R2


[15] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 1: 28

[16] Holy Bible [NASB] Genesis 2: 16

[17] Holy Bible [NASB] Deuteronomy 30: 19

[18] https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/genesis-and-human-stewardship-of-the-earth/

[19] ibid

[20] Holy Bible [NASB] Ezekiel 28:12-18


Round 3

3 of 3
avatar
Kohai Administrator
Con #5

FORFEITED

avatar
fauxlaw Global Moderator
Pro #6

FORFEITED

New comment

avatar
fauxlaw Global Moderator
•••
#7
--> @SomeDebatePerson

I want to thank you for taking interest in this debate. I'm sorry it ended up as it did. Forces greater than mine interceded to derail it, and I'm sure Kohai agrees that the stars were just misaligned. Happens. Anyway, thanks for your interest.

avatar
•••
#6
--> @fauxlaw

Will do.

I could tell this debate was well planned, but just didn’t work. I also didn’t want this debate to end in a tie if unnecessary because of all the planning and work.

avatar
fauxlaw Global Moderator
•••
#5
--> @Kohai, @SomeDebatePerson

Once Kohai and I agreed to proceed with a new debate, keeping our respective rounds 1 & 2 intact, making the debate depend much on just original round 3's, the new debate was loaded, but the old debate was not removed, causing confusion. Then, Kohai forfeited R3, and I went into surgery and forfeited my R3. I think the debate ought to be cancelled. I do not want to win on a forfeit, and I'm sure Kohai feels the same. I suggest ignoring the vote

avatar
•••
#4
--> @fauxlaw, @Kohai

Do you guys want us to vote on the debate, or did it just not work out the way you planned?

avatar
•••
#3
--> @Kohai

Don’t forget

avatar
fauxlaw Global Moderator
•••
#2
--> @Kohai

Done

avatar
Kohai Administrator
•••
#1
--> @fauxlaw

Sorry I've been so busy. Accept this debate and we'll copy and paste our arguments from the last one and I'll delete the old one