Islam is Useless in Every sense

Finished religion morality humanity science evolution
Like this debate? Score 0
···
X Facebook
Pro Instigator Opens first
Instigator Avatar
½
Rating
1492
Debates
1
Win rate
0.00%
Con Contender Winner
Contender Avatar
2½
Mal
Rating
1390
Debates
469
Win rate
45.52%
Verdict Mal wins · 2 points
Mouse Pro
½
Mal Con
2½

After 3 votes (1 tie) — 2 points ahead


Round 1

1 of 4
avatar
Mal
Con #2

Opposite side FORFEITED.


I rest my case.

Round 2

2 of 4
avatar
Mal
Con #4

I rest my case.

Round 3

3 of 4
avatar
Mal
Con #6

I rest once more.


Thanks.

Round 4

4 of 4
avatar
Mal
Con #8

Opposing side forfeits debate.


Case closed here .

New comment

avatar
•••
#2

Sam Harris: "Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas."

avatar
•••
#1

A short description on myself, I am an atheist, or agnostic atheist to be precise, I mostly align with leftist ideology, not because I fit in their description but they just happen to describe my ideology... I don't consider myself bound by a fixed set of ideology, I am an empath,I won't attack with ad hominem but I might use analogies that involve personal experiences

And I am specifically against Islam because it has ruined the world today, I don't have problem with muslims and I believe that most muslims are actually victims of Islam

Ragnar
Ragnar Global Moderator
#3
Criterion Pro Tie Con
Winner
Forfeiture.

...

I do agree with criticism of a lack of any argument to weight, but to me conduct is still a small factor which can shift the allotment.
fauxlaw
fauxlaw Global Moderator
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con
Winner
Neither opponent presented argument; Pro, by full forfeiture of each round, but Con, as well, by assuming full forfeiture by Pro in the first round, and resting on that opinion through the balance of rounds. In order for an opponent to properly win a debate, I need to see argument from at least one side for or against the proposed topic. As there are no arguments from either side for or against the Resolution, I judge this debate a draw. That result points ts to a voting issue on this site: the lack of a negative vote option for voters. I believe this "debate," while having a legitimate Resolution, saw no effort by either size. They should both lose. The only other option is to avoid voting on the debate at all, which I usually do in this case, but something must be done to prevent one side winning when neither side presented argument. That one side is awarded a point when no argument was given, such a vote spoils the grading system of debate.
Kohai
Kohai Administrator
#1
Criterion Pro Tie Con
Winner
Full forfeit = auto loss