Under normal circumstances there is no excuse not to be Catholic

Finished
Like this debate? Score 0
···
X Facebook
Pro Instigator Opens first
Instigator Avatar
½
Rating
1435
Debates
9
Win rate
38.89%
Con Contender Winner
Contender Avatar
2½
Mal
Rating
1388
Debates
468
Win rate
46.15%
Verdict Mal wins · 2 points
MasterDestroyer Pro
½
Mal Con
2½

After 3 votes (1 tie) — 2 points ahead

Normal circumstances means there is a catholic church in proximity to you and you are capable of getting there consistently.

Round 1

1 of 3

what you even doin' if you not a catholic?

He said 'know them by their fruits', boy we got a basket

see we put in all the works, you don't wanna match it

thats why at your church you see the fruits of all the sloth you practice

we built civilization and the prots collapsed it

made your king the pope, then he used you as a pawn and thats ex-

-actly what a "magisterial protestant" is

secularized the church by definition, what you thought would happen?


catholics are the only ones who ever had a church thats above the state

you cucked away that status then your butt was raped

now the average protestant church is just a place

to hear some lesbian spew ridiculous social justice takes


and its proven by the fact that all church's evolved, is it not

no one's like the first century church, but catholics didn't stop

like everyone is frozen in time at the point they schismed off

and only catholics still have a church with growing, living doc-

-trines, but I guess there is an exception to what I'm spittin' huh

the "evangelicals" brought us strip mall churches and christian rock

if I had the chance to meet Kenneth Copeland I'd kick his crotch

wait..I just remembered, prots also invented copin'

Martin Luther was a Catholic, but made up some shit that kept him goin'

when his chosen path didn't work and he had repressed emotions


so don't even try to talk

fiber-optic wires pop

through your eyeballs and light them up

then your shook by a seismic shock

the minds of prots are as fried as hot

finger lickin' chicken from aunt jemima's shop

and I'm the top

debate rapper alive, I stomped

your arguments, rhymes are outside the box

I'm sure you don't hear this kind a lot


avatar
Mal
Con #2

I don't see any argument made from any affirmative side.


In essence, I don't have a true participant here.


Has two more chances to participate on the subject.


We're on debate craft. Not in a YouTube short, tiktok , snapchat, any other social media entertainment.


I rest my case.

Round 2

2 of 3
avatar
Mal
Con #4

Exactly.

Round 3

3 of 3
avatar
Mal
Con #6

Case closed y'all.

New comment

avatar
•••
#3

I wouldn't be a catholic just to not end up in the same category as this total idiot

avatar
•••
#2
--> @MasterDestroyer

Stop rapping

avatar
•••
#1

Under normal circumstances the only excuse not to be Catholic is that Santa's elves unionized and went on strike. Who needs wafers turning into actual flesh when you can chomp on a Pop-Tart and call it transubstantiation with extra frosting? I'm allergic to fairy tales that come with guilt trips and a side of eternal barbecue.

Criterion Pro Tie Con
Winner
Reason being, a draw to clear as Con had already won. Pro was out of context as Con rightly pointed out, though Con made no effort to refute the proposition, which they very easily could have done in a single paragraph.
fauxlaw
#2
Criterion Pro Tie Con
Winner
Pro's R1 was offensive, and R@ + R3 forfeited.
Con presented a valid argument that he had no legitimate opponent, that there were two more rounds for Pro to to be a legit opponent, and that this was a debate, not ordinary social media.
Con wins.
Criterion Pro Tie Con
Winner
As impressive as the affirmative's rap might have been, it doesn't uphold their burden, and it obviously wasn't a serious attempt at debate, and thus it's only fair this goes to con.