ALL PEOPLE of U.S. residing citizenship support the presidential administration.

All people whether they realize it or not , in a place called America, citizens of such a place support the laws they abide in. By in turn supporting such you, them, young and old support the government and the presidency thereof.

To some degree which you can say by law and or maintaining the legal judicial systems, all people support directly and or indirectly.

Doesn't matter if a person didn't vote for a candidate or is in total opposition for a particular candidate.

That's it .

Common objections:

"But I don't support the politician's policies".

"But I don't support all the person's policies".

"Wait, I voted for the other person".

It may take some time to register this.

You can't abide by a government and not support it at the same time.

That's how government exists. It exists from its electoral party andddddd non electoral party.

You cannot dwell in your governed living and not support it at all. It supports you.

Directly, indirectly. Think on it .

Now if you don't want to support or you are not a citizen, that's what it is . You'd be or become a former citizen doing the same thing some where else.

That's pretty much where it's at.

Now to the opposing side I request not to fuss over arguing definitions.

I trust you know what a law is. What a citizen is, what a government is, what a president is, what a vote is , what an election is , what a country is, what justice is and what a judicial system is.

We're talking about citizens. Those people that are legally residing in a country, some land. Living in a land , yes. While they're living they're doing something or things. What are they doing in terms of the law or of what they are allowed to do?

Whatever it is one way or another, it is in maintaining the system of government, legalism.

................................We can open it up for questions and answers.

To what was said in the comments, I can believe it.

I believe the opposing side is just stumped.

After you read the ironclad logic, you just sometimes can't honestly come up with anything.

You honestly don't have a comeback to something that is outside the box because all you have is conventional expected retorts.

So I could give this person a month. I take two weeks along with the opposing side's two weeks to come up with something.

But.......neh.

I rest my case.

I rest my case.

Everyone, take notes on how to run off cowardice. Just like that. When I move they move, when I move you move .... just like that.

Case closed......(Freeway's voice) EARLY.

I agree with the person in the comments.

See, we're in a debate arena. We're not in an echo chamber.

So we're going to disagree. Just because we disagree, I don't play the silent treatment.

You say whatever it is you say about me and you use that as reason to not debate me and that's your opinion and your right to it.

I don't have to agree with your view on me or my case. That doesn't give justification to forfeit. You still forfeit on the general basis of disagreement. You see me however you do and I disagree. I don't view myself that way. We agree to disagree. Argue or forfeit.

The opposing side decided to take all these challenges and forfeited every last one of them if otherwise refuted the opposing side altogether.

How many people I've debated and disagreed? Welcome to the debate arena.

People get in their feelings, play the silent treatment and by childish tactics, block non malicious, non malevolent, non harassing behaviors.

Either way, you've gotten refuted, been refuted and made to forfeit because the person can't even take what I say and use it against me.

Open and shut case.