The female body is classically "beautiful."

I suggest this debate be either voided or at least avoid voting because both participants failed to make an argument, rendering a two-sided forfeit. In addition, the instigator/Pro does not have an adequate definition of "beauty" to produce a valid argument. "Physiognomy" a term used in the Description, is a discredited concept developed in ancient Greece, but abandoned at the close of the 19th century, that a person's character traits can be determined from outward appearance. This proposal does not match the apparent Pro BoP of strict physical appearance of the human [we presume] female [it's not specified that "human" is the intended species to discuss [reference only to female and male], having naught to do with associated characters of the female, so the entire format of the debate is at cross-purposes as originally challenged by the instigator.