If you engage in heterosexuality, should birth control be used and the number of births be restricted for any circumstance?

The point about the desire to increase the population, is the desire of sexual interest.

Do you not know why we have sexual interests to begin with?

Heterosexuality has nothing to do with birth control.

Births can be controlled practically and literally by not engaging in heterosexuality.

Being that any other sexuality is a disorder from heterosexuality, the order of this sexuality is sexual reproduction which would mean surviving ourselves.

The point about increasing the population or maintaining the population has to to with our desire to survive.

Anything else would be antithetical to our organic natures.

To actually to desire to survive your genes currently right now , heterosexuality is just an extension for continuity of that .

This idea of being "anti- population growing" is linked to the attitude and programming of embracing birth control, stunting our survival, stunting our genes, stunting our growth via diet , lifestyle, particular drugs, depleting life.

In order to legalize and legislate these different things that are actually depleting, socially, there has been a conditioning to embrace and accept all these antithetical things as life's meaning has been reduced to pure hedonistic liberal values.

So the question, to get the epicenter of the topic.

Being that heterosexuality concerns sexual reproductive health and replenishing of life as extension of our living like how we consume what we do to do the same, why would birth control be involved when heterosexuality doesn't control birth?

You have to manipulate heterosexuality so that birth can be controlled like stapling the stomach which is manipulation to control what it digests.

Next question, if you do not manipulate the natural order of things with heterosexuality, if you don't attempt to control birth engaging in heterosexuality, does this change the nature of heterosexuality?

"No, people want sex to discover their identity. It has absolutely nothing to do with reproduction or a desire to grow the population at all whatsoever. You just assume that! Probably bc you are a straight who just grew up and didnt get it.."

Alright so the context of this topic is the sex or sexuality in heterosexuality.

So we know that is the engagement of sexual penile vaginal intercourse. This sex act is engaged with the itinerary of climax, right.

The setup of that desire to climax according to physiological make-up enables sexual reproductive organs to function. How is this pertinent to what you said about identity? Where you get that from ? Is this your idea of what heterosexuality is?

The function in heterosexuality is the physical anatomical giving and receiving. Is this idea you have passed to you to change the nature of heterosexuality in definition in order to blur sexual disorders just making sexuality anything you want?

"Then why are there millions of gays worldwide, even among the animal kingdom with gay creatures."

That's what a disorder is from heterosexuality. See the use of opposing sexual organs, to go contrary to that would be inconsistent according to their function which is what a disorder is. This is not the topic of about why homosexuality exists but I took advantage of the opportunity to grant informative points.

"Heteronormative types of cultures are harmful. The world is getting hungry. We need less kids. The planet is getting warmer and we are all gonna die pretty soon anyway-"

You didn't answer the question but anyway my question is the following. Where did this culture of thinking we need to reduce surviving our genes thus stunting our survival and getting nihilistic like that?

Is it a part of the agenda programming today?

Is this why society embraces non sexually reproductive behavior with sexual reproductive organs?

People have been programmed to not survive themselves. You're demonstrating the point of the conditioning. I had a friend, she called it anti-human.

Why should we be against the function of ourselves?

Please answer all the questions.

Please demonstrate homosexuality is a function of ourselves , our sexual reproductive organs.

Alright your position is just liberal believing in doing things any ole kind way , as a supporter of the lifestyle would be.

So being this is all you got, leave it there.

Your position is not about a basis of a reason connecting inherent functionality to the structure of things in their nature. It's just a willy nilly, using anything in any subjective arbitrary sense which makes proper use and misuse universally non existent because it's all relative.

So we can't really engage with that. We either have a fundamental standard for things that we can demonstrate or say it's just all opinions which I don't dispute opinions.

No thanks but I wouldn't mind an actual debate.