Not published yet
Resolution:
Islamic dilemma has no ground and bases on misrepresentation of Islamic Scripture by Biblicists.
Pro:
My stance is Islamic, where I consider Islamic explanation more compelling and acceptable.
Con:
He must provide whether his stance or explanation is more compelling and acceptable being a Biblicists.
Burden: shared
Rules:
1
No vote bomb is allowed on this debate.
2
Have civilized debate.
3
If forfeit by inevitable circumstances, then Kohai will delete the debate, and we will start a new one because he can do that. what inevitable circumstances means is that, in my state sometime internet completely shut because of lock down and political Issues.
4
last round for conclusion and all other for arguments.
5
All external resources must be considered a part of debate.
6
No moderator is allowed to vote on this debate.
7
Voter must read the whole debate and must not exclude anything to formulate their RFD.
8
Voter must vote based on what is within the debate and must not vote on their person knowledge and opinion.
let's have a nice debate.
Round 1
1 of 5Not published yet
Round 2
2 of 5Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
3 of 5Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 4
4 of 5Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 5
5 of 5Not published yet
Not published yet
Just noticed a major flaw
The title says Islam vs Anything, which is very stupid because Islam gets slapped in almost every logical/Scientific discussion
But then in the description, the goal post to moved to debate "Biblicists" which is preety much close, and easier to debate
There's little difference in Islam and Christianity in terms of pure textual interpretation
So we aren't actually getting anything out of this debate, if it's just another Islam vs Christianity debate
That's an interesting debate
The ideology of the most inbred people(statistically), the most illiterate people(again statistically), the ideology of people known to beat women and put them in veils(statistically), the ideology of people who want others dead(not statistically, but according to the book), the ideology of people who were believing Earth was flat not so long ago, the ideology of people who give birth to 99% of terrorists(statistically, by UN, had to write 99% but I couldn't find a non Islamic terrorist organization on UN list) and the ideology of people who believe in polygamy, the ideology of people who take Muhammed's words over those of scientists, the ideology of people more loyal to their religion than the country they belong to, the ideology that was spread through swords and sex, the ideology that requires rituals of Animal Sacrifices, the ideology that requires forceful child circumcision
VS
Science Common Sense probably