Universe Art of Water > Biologics

Started by ebuc

Replies
21
Posts
22
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 β€’β€’β€’

Morphogenetic{?} fields of water > ergo > biologics


Go to 13:25 with Rupert Sheldrake narrating see a 5-fold Icosahedral { Phi-fold } radiolarian.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTerUb7SSyQ

Edit comment

#2 β€’β€’β€’

Biologics are complex medications made from living organisms, such as cells, bacteria, or animal and human tissues, unlike traditional drugs that are chemically synthesized. They are used to treat many conditions, including inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and work by targeting specific proteins in the body to calm the immune system.Examples include insulin, vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and gene therapy. 




Edit post

#3 β€’β€’β€’

The late Sir John Maddox, one of CSICOP’s most eminent Fellows,in an interview broadcast on BBC television in 1994, said, β€œSheldrake is putting forward magic instead of science, and that can be condemned in exactly the language that the Pope used to condemn Galileo, and for the same reason. It is heresy.”

Edit post

#4 β€’β€’β€’

Reviews of Sheldrake's books have at times been extremely negative about their scientific content. In 2009, Adam Rutherford, geneticist and deputy editor of Nature, criticized Sheldrake's books for containing research that was not subjected to the peer-review process expected for science, and suggested that his books were best "ignored."

Edit post

#5 β€’β€’β€’
@FLRW


Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphic resonance proposes that nature is not governed by fixed laws, but by "habits" that are passed on through a collective memory called morphic fields. These fields are shaped by the forms and behaviors of past similar systems and influence the form and behavior of present systems through a process of non-material resonance, meaning individuals and species inherit patterns from their predecessors. This is considered a controversial theory that challenges conventional scientific thinking, but Sheldrake argues it can explain phenomena like instincts and memory that are not fully accounted for by genetics.  





Edit post

#6 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

So one way to prove or disprove Sheldrake's theory, would be to change our habits regularly.


Of course, changing our habits regularly would become habitual.


Though I often put forwards the idea of a Universally inherited GOD principle that is separate to Physical Laws...Which might explain instincts and memory.



Edit post

#7 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch


To disprove Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphic resonancecritics point to a lack of evidence, inconsistencies with established scientific fields like genetics and neuroscience, and the failure of experiments to replicate his findings. One can challenge the theory by focusing on the lack of empirical data and the results of failed replication attempts, such as Richard Wiseman's investigation into Sheldrake's "psychic pet" experiments. Another approach is to question the assumptions of Sheldrake's theory, which is often seen as conflicting with the principles of modern biology and physics.  

Edit post

#8 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Critics pointing to, doesn't disprove, just indicates disapproval.


It's all theoretical disciplines that are short on definitive answers.



Edit post

#9 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

Critics add to disapproval by voicing negative feedback or objections, emphasizing something is wrong, and can make a person feel judged, inadequate, or rejected.While criticism can be a form of negative evaluation and social pain, it can also be interpreted as constructive feedback for improvement. However, because the initial reaction to criticism is often emotional, it frequently fuels feelings of disapproval and defensiveness. 

Edit post

#10 β€’β€’β€’

Art { patterns } > boats { integral patterns } > water { unique 3 states of existence > biologic life { most complex integrals }


.." Ten months later Heyerdahl launched the Ra II from the same Moroccan port as Ra


This time he commissioned four Aymara indians from Lake Titicaca to build the reed vessel. Reed boats similar to those from ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt were still being made by craftsmen from this area in the Andes mountains. "..

Ra, 1969 - Ra II 1970 β€” Kon-Tiki museet


Then their is also the recycled Thor Heyerdahl.

https://elizabethqueenseaswann.com/Business_Plan/Thor_Heyerdahl_Kontiki_Raft_Ra_Expeditions_Explorers.html



Edit post

#11 β€’β€’β€’

Rupert Sheldrake's theory of "morphic resonance" 

posits that natural systems, from crystals to living organisms, inherit a collective memory from previous similar systems through invisible, non-material structures called "morphic fields". He has expanded on this idea to provide unconventional explanations for biological development, inheritance, memory, and even extrasensory perception. 

Edit post

#12 β€’β€’β€’

https://elizabethqueenseaswann.com/Business_Plan/pics_business_plan/Thor-Ra2-Kon-Tiki-Museum-Oslo-Heyerdahl.jpg


.." After a number of weeks, Ra took on water. The crew discovered that a key element of the Egyptian boatbuilding method had been neglected, a tether that acted like a spring to keep the stern high in the water while allowing for flexibility. Water and storms eventually caused it to sag and break apart after sailing more than 6,400 km (4,000 miles). The crew was forced to abandon Ra, some hundred miles (160 km) before the Caribbean islands, and was saved by a yacht. "..


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/90/Iraqi_mudhif_interior.jpg/500px-Iraqi_mudhif_interior.jpg


Reed budiling

Edit post

#13 β€’β€’β€’
@Sidewalker

Go to 2:50 of this standard model tune where he sings...come with me baby come bond with me...I LOVE THIS TUNE! You will too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8FAJXPBdOg


The Molecular shape of You and of course this includes water since adult humans are what, 60% water and babys 80%.

Edit post

#14 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc
Go to 2:50 of this standard model tune where he sings...come with me baby come bond with me...I LOVE THIS TUNE! You will too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8FAJXPBdOg

The Molecular shape of You and of course this includes water since adult humans are what, 60% water and babys 80%.


LOL, that was great, my son is a biochemist, I'm sending it to him, I'm sure he will really love it.


Thanks

Edit post

#15 β€’β€’β€’

Rupert Sheldrake's theory of "morphic resonance" is 

widely rejected by the mainstream scientific community due to a lack of rigorous empirical evidence and its conflict with established biological and physical laws. Mainstream critics view it as a form of pseudoscience or magical thinking, even though Sheldrake presents it as a scientific hypothesis. 

Edit post

#16 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
Though I often put forwards the idea of a Universally inherited GOD principle that is separate to Physical Laws...Which might explain instincts and memory.


DI..' The molecular shape of you '...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8FAJXPBdOg


DI..' The driver of our instincts is the brainstem – the region at the very base of your brain, just above the spinal chord. Scientists have known for some time that another brain region, the prefrontal cortex, plays a role in keeping those instincts in check (see box down below). But exactly how the prefrontal cortex puts a break on the brainstem has remained unclear. '..

https://www.embl.org/news/science/1701-neural-connection-instincts/


Debby

Debby

Debby

Debby

Debby

Debby Yay Debby Debby Debby Debby

Edit post

#17 β€’β€’β€’
@Sidewalker

At an atomic level we are mostly empty space.

Edit post

#18 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
At an atomic level we are mostly empty space.


Even egg heads are filled with a field of yoke.


RI...' yoke is composed of two kinds field at minimum:


..1} electric field,


...2} protonic field.


Since the yoke is complex the neutronic field is involved in these interference patterns.


Ultra-micro Gravity and Dark Energy{?} underlie all three of the reality field.


There is no where egg heads can go to escape God's/Universe's interfering reality fields and ultra-micro meta-fields.


If any truly non-occupied space occurs withing Universe/God, it is ultra-micro, and ultra-short existence, if at all.


DI { Debby AI }.........sports fields have grass, air, bugs, sodas, french fires, forks, mustard, sound/audio and balls.


..1...........5p....7p..........11p......13p.............17p.........etc............hi ^ v ^ its me .................

0..................6.....................12............................18/0 etc...........^ v ^.................

.........3p................9.............................15...................etc.......................^ v ^...

....2p....4............8....10....................14....16..............etc...................................^ v ^........



Edit post

#19 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
At an atomic level we are mostly empty space.


Do tou suppose that's why we lack substance.

Edit post

#20 β€’β€’β€’
@Sidewalker

Everything about the organic data processing and materials handling unit is ridiculous, though seemingly true.

Edit post

#21 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
Everything about the organic data processing and materials handling unit is ridiculous, though seemingly true.


Godess


God-ess


God-ess-ence > X x - X x - X y


Ma { X x } > Ma-ma { X x } > Papa { X y }


12-around-1 spheres > four nucleated hexagonal planes


Four hexagonal bow tie waves define 12-around-1 vertexial nodal events

See B graphic in following link

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s04/figs/f5511.html


Four hexagonal events have outer surface definition of 8 triangles { stability } and 6 squares { transform-ability }


See how squares allow for transform-ability in following link

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s04/figs/f6008.html


Named by Fuller inventor, the jitterbug


https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s04/figs/f6108.html


Fuller states that the 12-around-1 four bow-tie waves is closet we will ever come to knowing God --I say God-ess-ence-- because it has in perfect equanimity:


24 circumferential chords/edges


and


24 radii


Perfect nucleated equanimity > minus the nucleation is the non-stablized, semi-icosahedron { lacks 6 of its 30 edges } >


..> stabllized octahedron >


..> transform to the non stable, semi-isotropic truss pattern { see Grahm Bells most stable, Isotropic truss design } >


..> circumferential triangles { flattened2-bonded/valenced } around the nucleated4-bonded set of triangles >


..> folds in three differrent ways of chirality { left and right } its 2:1 ratio of the outer three triangles > and two differrent ways of becoming the 8-bonded/valenced tetra{4}hedron.


2D {core unfolded } flattened 8 triangles { nucleated set of 4 core triangles }


3D { core in-folded } tetrahedron of 8 triangles


Four diametrically opposing axi of opposite surface triangles, allow for four left and four right spins of contracting collaspe, or as expansion of the jitterbug.


4 = systemic integrity


3 = structural integrity


2 = bilateral { complexity unfolded synergetically --human-- }


1 { many ones } = multi-cellular sea sponge

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponge

Edit post

#22 β€’β€’β€’

' Closest we will ever come to knowing God' ...paraphrasing B Fuller


24 circumferential chords/edges, and,


24 radii, and I forgot to mention,


24 regular triangles in the four bi-sectional, hexagonal plane that define the cubo-octahedon aka Vector Equlibrium.


See the VE appear when the tetrahedron transforms to zero volume while maintaing integrity of its four surface triangular planes.

Edit post