New Theory On Eypgtian Pyramids Construction

Started by ebuc

Replies
16
Posts
17
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 β€’β€’β€’

A new utube with new theory of how Egyptian pyramids were built. I dont think this is AI created. I also like the idea very much.


One of the key items she points out is the keystone point at top is actually one of the hardest things to complete with the two other classically primary ways that have been proposed as most logical.


She state that this is why dont see these pointy caps on other pyramids around the world, is because the Eygptians who time, plenty of bountiful lush food sources and peoples { not just slaves } who were all working toward this grand pyramid making goal.


Oh yeah, in this image below, do not confuse it with the often used and accepted ramp around the pyramid to build it as that method had two flaws, that, this new theory does not.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5kWDOuY2Uo

Edit comment

#2 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Sure, try building a pyramid. You have modern technology. Should be easy, right?


Here are the specific details of the 1978 Japanese pyramid experiment of building only 10 meter tall pyramid:


The Goal & The Crew: Nippon TV, guided by Egyptologist Sakuji Yoshimura, wanted to test if modern technology could replicate the ancient construction methods of the Giza Pyramids.


The Scale Down: The team originally planned a large structure but was forced to reduce the size to roughly 10 meters tall and 15 meters at the base due to a shortage of funds and rising limestone costs.


The Failure of Ancient Methods: Relying exclusively on raw manpower, wooden sledges, and ropes, the team found the 1-to-3-ton limestone blocks nearly impossible to move. The stones could only be dragged a few centimeters per day.


The Resort to Modern Machinery: Facing logistics issues, the builders had to bring in electric saws, cranes, and even a helicopter to hoist and place the stones, proving that replicating the feat with primitive tools alone was unsuccessful.



they couldnt move 1 ton block stone. But some egyptian pyramids have block stones weight as much as 80 tons.


The stone blocks used to build the Egyptian pyramids vary greatly in size and weight, but the average stone block weighs approximately 2.5 tons (2.3 metric tons). However, depending on where the stones are located within the structure and the materials used, their weights span a wide range from 1.3 tons to as much as 80 tons. [1, 2, 3]

Weight Breakdown by Category

  1. Standard Core Limestone Blocks: These make up the vast majority of the pyramid structures (such as the Great Pyramid of Giza). They typically range from 1.5 to 3 tons each, with the blocks generally getting smaller and lighter (around 1.3 tons) near the top of the structure.
  2. Outer Casing Stones: The original outer layers were composed of highly polished Tura limestone. These massive, precision-cut foundation and casing stones at the base can weigh up to 15 tons each.
  3. King's Chamber Granite Beams: The heaviest stones in the entire pyramid are the massive granite blocks used to construct the ceiling and stress-relieving chambers above the King's Chamber. Transported from quarries in Aswan, these specialized blocks weigh between 25 and 80 tons each. [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

Total Weight of a Pyramid

To put this into perspective, the Great Pyramid of Giza is constructed from roughly 2.3 million stone blocks. Combined with the mortar used during construction, the total weight of the entire monument is estimated to be around 6 million tonnes. [1, 4, 10]

If you are researching pyramid construction, I can provide more details on how the Egyptians transported these heavy stones across the Nile or the tools and ramp systems they used to lift them. Which aspect would you like to explore next? [11, 12, 13]

Edit post

#3 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Nah it was aliens bro trust me

Edit post

I still don’t know what to type!

#4 β€’β€’β€’
@Mag1cman

Nah Bro.


Aliens would use extremely lightweight but strong composite materials...Same sort of stuff as the Mothership.


Why the F would they want to quarry and lug 80 ton lumps of rock about.

Edit post

#5 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
Nah Bro. Aliens would use extremely lightweight but strong composite materials...Same sort of stuff as the Mothership.
Why the F would they want to quarry and lug 80 ton lumps of rock about.


Thank you Serge. I agree with you logical, common sense critical thinking approach.


Here is more info about this Trapezoid Method of Engineering one of more of the Egyptian pyramids. She says the outer working platforum pyramid had in it or also used to haul the limestone cladding and apply it as the build. She states some other way, tho what she said, doesnt make logical sense to me.


She states that the as the outer pyramidal working structure --constructed of limestone--- flipped over the lime stone blocks as the deconstructed from top to bottom, and applying the limestone cladding as they deconstructed the outer platform. I doesnt make sense to adding cladding via a method of top to bottom as the deconstruct.


https://www.facebook.com/funnyoldeworld/videos/the-cannibalising-pyramid-theory-egypt-ancienthistory-losthistory/1587609185594285/

Edit post

#6 β€’β€’β€’
@Mag1cman
Nah it was aliens bro trust me


It wasn't just pyramids. Some huge statues in ancient Egypt have almost perfectly symmetrical faces on left and right side. No one today can build such statues without modern technology.

Edit post

#7 β€’β€’β€’

https://www.reddit.com/r/ancientegypt/s/e0G5WVKnMT

Edit post

#8 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Very interesting, and it makes a lot of sense too, probably closer to the truth than any other theory I've heard of.

Edit post

#9 β€’β€’β€’
@SatanLucy

Your argument that they couldn't have been built is defeated by the fact that they exist, they were in fact, built.



Edit post

#10 β€’β€’β€’
@Mag1cman
Nah it was aliens bro trust me


OK, so aliens traveled across the universe to come here and build some stone structures, and then left.


The question becomes, why, why would they come all that way to play with blocks.

Edit post

#11 β€’β€’β€’
@Sidewalker
Your argument that they couldn't have been built is defeated by the fact that they exist, they were in fact, built.


My argument wasnt that they couldn't have been built.

Edit post

#12 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

I think she was also trying to sell software.


And for sure, pointy structures have long since been an intelligent primate thing...Secure in the intelligent knowledge that it gets them closer to a GOD.


So, I am of the opinion that the "Egyptian Pyramids" are, and were somehow constructed...And glad that I wasn't around at the time to assist with the project.


The "Egyptian Pyramids" are of fleeting interest and I have no great desire to go take a look...As down the road is Yr Wyddfa if I fancy a trek, where I can either walk or take the train and convene with a GOD at 3650 feet if I so wish...In fact, I live on the side of a 1200 foot hill, which beats a 480 foot pile of stones by some 720 feet.


Intelligence was as intelligence did...Still does I suppose.

Edit post

#13 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
Intelligence was as intelligence did...Still does I suppose.


Egyptians kept lots of records of the math abiliites --tho some times found in strange places { horus' eye?}.


The recorded delivery of blocks of stone on river by specific boat men in specific ports.


What they did not record ---or if they did, it was lost-- was how they built the pyramids. If nto specifically the great pyramid.


So were left were these varied ideas of how it was done. This latest trapzoid --back-n-forth ramps on one or more faces of outer pyramid platform-- theory solves problems the two other most well known --if not accepted-- issues with these other two.

Edit post

#14 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

I think that we have to just accept the fact that the Egyptian pyramids were constructed somehow, and that we are not quite sure how they were constructed...And I think that the general consensus is ramps and a lot of effort, rather than space helicopters...That said, fascination is harmless if it doesn't become obsessive.

Edit post

#15 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
I think that we have to just accept the fact that the Egyptian pyramids were constructed somehow, and that we are not quite sure how they were constructed...


Agreed


And I think that the general consensus is ramps and a lot of effort, rather than space helicopters...


Agreed


That said, fascination is harmless if it doesn't become obsessive.


Its a engineering feat to be discovered, since we have no texts from the Eygptians of how they did. That is a bit of mystery on its own, since the Eygptians were good keeping detailed text accounts of who shipped stones on their boats on what dates and to which ports along the Nile river.


1} The outer pyramid --allowing more platform area for operational working--,


2 } uses the much less degrees of incline for rolling stones on logs,


3} allows for work area for installing the pointed stone top of pyramid not found on pyramids in other sites around the Earth,


4} if there were texts telling how the pyramids were constructed,


....4a} were they lost,


.....4c} were they discovered and destroyed by archeologists over years of discovery,


.......4d} they exist yet hidden by modern Eygptian archeologists,


..........4e} were they destroyed by original builders for who knows what reason?


Here is site about info regarding large ports with records of boats etc using these ports.


...' β€˜Including Wadi el-Jarf and Ayn Sukhna, we now know the location of three harbours on the Red Sea,’ says Pierre, β€˜and Wadi el-Jarf is the earliest of them. From what we have seen so far, we think it was created in the reign of Sneferu (c.2675- 2633 BC), the king at the beginning of the 4th Dynasty. At the time he was probably constructing a pyramid of his own. This was an era when things were built on a grand scale, with 31 storage galleries created at Wadi el-Jarf, whereas our two later harbours don’t have more than ten. Even more important is that a big jetty was installed at Wadi el-Jarf, which probably makes it the oldest artificial open-sea harbour in the world. In total, this jetty is about 200m long from east to west and from north to south, enclosing an area of around 6-7ha. Again, this sets it apart from our other two sites, where natural features on the coastline were used to shelter boats.’ ..

https://www.world-archaeology.com/features/records-of-the-pyramid-builders/



Edit post

#16 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Yes, such construction manuals might still be found...Though I'm guessing that modern engineers will still prefer to use cranes over ramps, rollers and enthusiastic non-slaves.

Edit post

#17 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
Though I'm guessing that modern engineers will still prefer to use cranes over ramps, rollers and enthusiastic non-slaves.


I dont think anyone wants to build a Egyptian style pyramid, as that Pharaoh worship religion long ago died and buried away.


Except for MAGA and Trump of course. A golden pyramid could be in the works or maybe orange pyramid. <(:--)) O ((--:)>


^^^ ^^^^ ^^ Land of Orange Pyramid MAGA Cone Heads in USA ^ ^^ ^^^^ ^^

Edit post