Unsolvable problem of Capitalism: Demand caused crisis

Started by SatanLucy

Replies
37
Posts
38
Page
1 / 2

Conversation

#1 •••
⚠️ This post has been marked as offensive.

Edit comment

#2 •••
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#3 •••
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#4 •••
@SatanLucy

Negative deman can cause the stock to crash.

Edit post

#5 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#6 •••
@SatanLucy

Clever stupid gene.

Edit post

#7 •••
@SergeantLynch

Even the positive is negative to Lucy.

Edit post

#8 •••
@SatanLucy

What exactly is the danger to consumers from unregulated capitalism?


For example, crisis of housing in USA. Around 40% of Americans dont own house they live in. This isnt because there is a shortage of houses. It is because rich found a new way to make themselves richer: Buy houses and apartments on mass scale, earn profit from rent, earn profit because houses rise in price. This increases cost of living for all others, because even if supply houses is sufficient, the supply is reduced for everyone else when rich people decide to take most of it.

And this problem is exclusive problem of unregulated capitalism, because rich have every incentive to do this when unregulated.

I don't think you even understand what you just wrote here. The opposite is reality. Try building a house anywhere in America or Canada. There are an ASSLOAD of regulations. That is why the costs are so ridiculously high, because the supply is artificially set by the government. Not Capitalists. And the rich pay the government to set that supply cap to make money. That's not "unregulated"


Edit post

#9 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#10 •••
@SatanLucy

That’s the American dream.

Edit post

#11 •••
@SatanLucy

Only the government can take. If the rich pay the government to take on their behalf, they deserve it by successfully indoctrinating poor people to trust the government.

Edit post

#12 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#13 •••
@SatanLucy

Not in a country with property rights. If you own a phone, nobody can take it from you without going to jail. Rich or poor. The government can take it, though, if you whip it out in a courthouse or other government-regulated areas.

Edit post

#14 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#15 •••
@SatanLucy

They can only control the market with government regulations. You have lost this debate. Again, try to place some wood down on property you own, try to build a house, and see how long it takes for the government, not a rich person, to tell wait not tell, force you... force you to tear it down.

Edit post

#16 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#17 •••
@SatanLucy

Rich people can buy zero stuff from people who do not want to sell. You lost this debate.

Likewise, economy of scale favors rich over anyone else, 

Economies of scale mean nothing with no willing buyers. In fact, it means bankruptcies on a large scale without willing buyers.


If you start to lay planks of wood on your own property, and a rich person wants to buy your new house he will ask for a selling price. If you won't sell, then the government will then come in and force you to tear it down.


That's regulated capitalism in action.

 which causes decrease of resources available for production for average person.

Correct, but the government did that under regulated crony capitalism.

You could have produced a house on your own property under unregulated capitalism with no problems.

Edit post

#18 •••

Remember than Eisenhower had a 92 percent top tax rate on the rich to reduce the huge debt from WW2.

Trump has now made that zero on the $37 trillion debt.

Edit post

#19 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#20 •••
@FLRW
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#21 •••
@SatanLucy
This doesn't happen in reality, sorry. Only in your imagination do rich people buy "zero stuff".


Actually, it happens all the time. Under crony Capitalism, sometimes the government doesn't allow a non-rich person to even sell willingly to a rich person.

It's usually under "anti-trust" laws. Another name for regulated crony capitalism.


In your imagination, it is rich people who have eminent domain laws that force you to sell a house you build on your own property, but the reality is, only the government in a regulated crony capitalism system will pass eminent domain laws to force you to sell. A rich person can't do this, but he can pay a government politician to do this to you.


Don't take my word for it; physically go to your front yard and start laying down some wood, and see who comes first to fuck you in the asshole. A rich person, or a government official paid by a rich person. Then you can feel the reality from the anus side in, and this debate will be over.

Edit post

#22 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#23 •••
@SatanLucy

Don't take my word for it; physically go to your front yard and start laying down some wood, and see who comes first to fuck you in the asshole. A rich person, or a government official paid by a rich person. Then you can feel the reality from the anus side in, and this debate will be over.



Edit post

#24 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#25 •••
@SatanLucy

You , rich or not rich, go do that. You, physically go to your front yard and start laying down some wood, and see who comes first to fuck you in the asshole. A rich person, or a government official paid by a rich person. Then you can feel the reality from the anus side in, and this debate will be over.


Without any regulations....


Then you will probably not have anyone fucking you in the anus for laying down wood on your own property to create a house and increase the supply of houses. Assuming you live in a country with property rights. Capitalism can't exist without property rights, even if you are rich. Capitalism doesn't require regulations, but rich people require regulated capitalism to gain access to your precious anus.


Edit post

#26 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#27 •••
@SatanLucy
Unless you are referring to slums, tents and shacks in India as an example of unregulated capitalism


Sure, you can use that example, make a shack on your front lawn, put up a sign -->

"for rent: 50 dollars a month" and "let's fight the rich by providing affordable housing"


See who pays you a visit to force you to tear it all down. It won't be a rich man.

Edit post

#28 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#29 •••
@SatanLucy

And regulated capitalism is a government official fucking up your shack, so you are forced to sleep on the ground or on a rich man's property. The reason why regulated capitalism is so heavily advertised in all circles is because ultra-rich people pay for all that advertising. It sure isn't poor people, middle class, and slightly less than ultra-rich people asking to get fucked by the government and investing in advertising to make that happen.

Edit post

#30 •••
@Shoresy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post