Bondi Beach and why Jews shouldn't even be allowed in Australia

Started by wylted

Replies
57
Posts
58
Page
1 / 2

Conversation

#1 •••
⚠️ This post has been marked as offensive.

Edit comment

#2 •••
@wylted

these countries need refugees because their own population cannot reproduce. Japan is excellent example of what happens when local population fails to reproduce due to anime, and government refuses to import migrants. So I wouldnt blame the Jews here. Australia just wants to avoid future of Japan.

Edit post

#3 •••
@SatanLucy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#4 •••
@wylted
japan is doing great


I mean, average woman in Japan has like 0.7 children, not even one whole child. So Japan faces population collapse and old people growing in number, which is bad because old people are a burden to society.

Edit post

#5 •••

Edit post

#6 •••

South Korea and Japan race to who will set record for lowest birth rates in history.



South Korea has the world's lowest birth rate, with its total fertility rate (TFR) hovering around 0.75 in 2024, a slight increase from the record low of 0.72 in 2023, marking the first rise in nine years, driven by a post-pandemic surge in marriages and international marriages. Despite this small uptick, the rate remains far below the 2.1 needed for population stability, with more deaths than births annually, indicating a significant demographic crisis and population decline. 

Edit post

#7 •••
@SatanLucy
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#8 •••
@wylted
So by getting rid of both sides of this problem, you prevent it from happening again.



Any suggestions as to how we get rid of them, gas chambers perhaps?

Edit post

#9 •••
@Sidewalker
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#10 •••
@wylted
it's probably just better to be predominantly Japanese and keep the good things about Japan


Edit post

#11 •••
@SatanLucy

Nature has a mechanism to lower reproduction rates in times of anxiety and stress, and that applies to all species, not just people.


Scarcity and abundance describe these external conditions. Stress describes how those conditions are experienced. Biology responds far more to perceived stability than to observable material wealth. You can have plenty of food, money, health, and technology, but if daily life feels pressured, competitive, and unforgiving, the body chemically reads that as risk, and cortisone levels rise (cortisone, cortisol, I forget which one it is.) Japan is abundant in resources, but high in social pressure, time scarcity, and fear of failure. That fear tells people, at a gut level, that adding children is dangerous, even when practical material needs are easily met.


Reproduction chemicals switch on when the future feels predictable and survivable. Abundance helps, but it’s not enough. Stress, uncertainty, and social pressures shut the system down. Biology doesn’t care whether the stress comes from actual death and famine or from relentless social expectations and zero margin for error. The body chemistry signal is the same... now is not the time to invest in the next generation.


Gratitude psychology vs resentment psychology also matters to body chemistry more than people like to admit. Grateful societies tend to see the future as something worth continuing. They feel anchored, supported, and confident that effort will be rewarded. That psychological safety makes reproduction feel natural rather than reckless. This is why people in poor countries reproduce, because they feel opportunity in the future and feel increasing hope for abundance, whereas ironically, the people who already have abundance won't feel much of an increase from their already high levels, and that's what really drives reproduction chemistry, the hope for more abundance, regardless of the existing level of abundance. I remember listening to a DART YouTube yesterday where one of the head guys of this site was claiming that a person working minimum wage would "have his life ruined" if he had a child. Forget the realities that a child born to a minimum wage parent in the most abundant nation ever to exist on the planet ever would be miles and away extremely lucky, the gratitude level of a minimum wage parent in America is ridiculously out of kilter from the gratitude levels of a typical new parent in India. And that was reflected in the premise that a new poor parent in America would "have his life ruined" by having a child.


Edit post

#12 •••
@Shoresy
Abundance helps


I think it doesnt. Many poor shitholes are reproducing like rabbits, and world's richest people claim they cant afford children. But this isnt any mystery. Japan puts a lot of pressure on people to pursue education and career. Education and career take a lot of individual's time, so much that individual barely has any free time left. then individual is encouraged to commit a classical mistake "career first, then family". So individual who barely has any free time, has much less motivation to have kids because kids would take what little free time is left for individual.


tao predicted this. Overworking a population means ruining a population. Governing a country is like frying a fish. You ruin it by frying(governing) too much. Japan has highest IQ in the world, yet they cant figure out what desert people with 50 IQ figured out. Even highest IQ is useless if person has no free time to think.

Edit post

#13 •••

Abundance helps insofar as reducing infant mortality rates, but it seems to have an opposite psychological effect if the new parent feels that the future holds decreasing abundance, regardless of the practical levels of abundance. Reproduction is never a function of objective wealth, regardless of what the "experts" say. You will wait around your entire life and hit the biological wall of infertility if you delay reproduction to accumulate some ethereal amount of "optimal wealth to raise a child."


It's 100% psychological in today's modern world of abundance.

Edit post

#14 •••
@Shoresy
Abundance helps insofar as reducing infant mortality rates


Abundance seems to consistently reduce birth rates. Infant mortality rates are never a problem in any poor country, because their birth rates are usually 3 to 4 per woman, so infant mortality rate has little effect and population still reproduces. But in rich countries, birth rates are so low that any infant mortality rate is a problem.


And it is like tao said, advanced countries demand too much of their population.


No, you cannot wait to have kids. Woman has what is usually called "expiration date". Most men prefer younger women, and this isnt any "disorder" in those men, but younger woman can give birth to more kids. this is because giving birth to kids takes time, and sooner you start, the more kids you can give birth to. So naturally, a man who biologically wants to have plenty of offspring biologically prefers younger women.


So when woman waits till she is 25 to start giving birth, in a lot of cases she is already too late. If you do basic, math, from 18 to 25 is 7 years, and in that time, woman could give birth to 2 to 3 kids. But if woman doesnt, but starts at 25, she will be less able to give birth in terms of numbers.


It is sort of like machine which produces a kid every 2 years. the sooner you start machine, the more kids you will have. And this machine has expiration date, so choosing to delay start means reducing output.

Edit post

#15 •••

No, Jews aren't universally safe anywhere due to rising global 

antisemitism, but safety varies significantly, with the US, Canada, Australia, and some parts of Europe seen as relatively safe due to strong communities and legal protections, while Israel provides state security but faces regional conflict; many Jews feel insecure globally and move towards these safer havens or Israel. Anti-Jewish sentiment, often fueled by extremist ideologies, targets Jewish people in diverse ways, from online hate to physical attacks on synagogues, making even traditionally secure places feel less so. 

Factors Influencing Jewish Safety:

  1. Antisemitism Trends: Rising nationalism, xenophobia, and political polarization globally contribute to increased anti-Jewish incidents, reports Unpacked for Educators and The American Prospect.
  2. Community Strength: Large, well-organized Jewish communities with strong communal security (like the Community Security Service (CSS) in the US) offer protection and support, notes ILTV's Insider.
  3. State Protection: Israel offers security through its own army and Iron Dome, but experiences conflict; diaspora nations offer legal protections, but face internal threats, says The Times of Israel and Unpacked for Educators.
  4. Geographic Location: Western countries (US, Canada, Australia) and certain European nations (France, UK) are generally seen as safer than regions in the Middle East, Africa, and parts of Asia where anti-Jewish sentiment is deeply entrenched, mention Unpacked for Educators and Wikipedia

Perceived Safer Areas:

  1. North America: US (e.g., certain suburbs, Brooklyn, Texas, California) and Canada have large Jewish populations and strong legal frameworks.
  2. Israel: Offers state-backed security, but is a focal point for conflict, writes The Times of Israel.
  3. Australia/NZ: Generally considered safe with robust Jewish life, notes Unpacked for Educators. 

Less Safe/Higher Risk Areas:

  1. Europe: Increasing antisemitism, sometimes involving state-level denial of Holocaust history or political antisemitism, makes many feel unsafe, report Unpacked for Educators and The American Prospect.
  2. Middle East/North Africa: Historically perilous, with many Jewish communities dwindling due to persecution and conflict, writes Unpacked for Educators. 

Ultimately, safety is complex, with many Jews feeling vulnerable globally and seeking security in strong diaspora communities or Israel, while acknowledging threats exist everywhere, says World Jewish Congress


Edit post

#16 •••
@wylted

How many times have you whacked off over the Bondi Beach shooting?

Edit post

#17 •••
@Sidewalker

Yes, Jews are considered God's "chosen people" in Judaism, meaning 

they were selected for a special covenant to receive the Torah, worship God, and exemplify His ways as a "light to the nations," not implying inherent superiority but special obligations like observing Mitzvot (commandments) and following the Noahide Laws for all righteous people. This concept stems from biblical passages where God chose Israel to be His treasured people, linking their identity to a mission and relationship with the divine. 

Meaning of "Chosen"

  1. Special Mission: To be a holy people, receive God's law (Torah), and spread His truth.
  2. Covenant & Obligation: A unique responsibility to uphold God's commandments (Sabbath, kosher, prayer, etc.).
  3. Not Superiority: It's about a unique role and responsibility, not that Jews are inherently better than other peoples. 

Biblical Basis

  1. Deuteronomy 14:2: "For you are a people holy to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people of his own possession, out of all the nations that are on the face of the earth".
  2. Abrahamic Covenant: God chose Abraham's lineage to bring blessings to all families on Earth. 

Jewish Perspectives

  1. All denominations agree: Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform Judaism affirm this belief.
  2. A "treasure people" (ʿam segullah): A special possession and heritage. 

For Non-Jews

  1. Universal Morality: All righteous people, regardless of faith, can have a place in the World to Come by following the universal Noahide Code (no idolatry, murder, theft, etc.). 


some interpret this as Jewish world domination.

Edit post

#18 •••
@wylted

how do you think of these thoughts exactly

Edit post

#19 •••

The Jews believed they were the chosen people by God to lead and dominate the world. What saved the world from the Jews?


Jews have faced numerous, repeated displacements and expulsions from their homeland (Israel/Judea) and various countries over millennia, starting with the Assyrians and Babylonians, then the Romans (leading to the major diaspora), followed by numerous European nations like England (1290), Spain (1492), and Portugal (1497), and more recently from Arab lands post-1948, a history often referred to as galut (exile). These expulsions, driven by empires, religious persecution, economic factors, and nationalism, forced Jews to wander globally, yet they maintained a strong connection to their ancestral land, culminating in the Zionist movement and modern Israel. 

Key Periods of Displacement:

  1. Ancient Empires (Pre-Roman):
  2. Assyrians (722 BCE): Conquered the northern Kingdom of Israel, deporting many inhabitants.
  3. Babylonians (586 BCE): Destroyed the First Temple and exiled the Judean elite to Mesopotamia (Babylonian Captivity).
  4. Roman Era (The Great Diaspora):
  5. Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE and the Bar Kokhba revolt, the Romans exiled many Jews from Judea, initiating a nearly 2,000-year exile from their homeland.
  6. Medieval & Early Modern Europe (Widespread Expulsions):
  7. England (1290), France (1394), Spain (1492), Portugal (1497): Major nations expelled their Jewish populations, often tied to economic resentment or desires for religious homogeneity.
  8. Arab & Muslim Lands (Post-1948):
  9. Following the creation of Israel, nearly a million Jews were persecuted, expelled, and forced to flee from Arab and Muslim countries in the Middle East and North Africa.
  10. The Holocaust (1933-1945):
  11. Systematic Nazi persecution led to mass emigration and, tragically, mass murder, creating millions of displaced persons (DPs) after the war. 

Reasons for Displacement:

  1. Imperial Conquests: Great empires (Assyrians, Babylonians, Romans) forcibly removed populations.
  2. Religious Intolerance: Often targeted as a visible minority, blamed for problems, and expelled by Christian or Muslim rulers.
  3. Economic Factors: Jews' roles in trade and finance made them vulnerable to taxation and expulsion when rulers needed funds or scapegoats.
  4. Nationalism: Drives to create culturally homogenous states often targeted minorities like Jews. 

This long history of displacement, while devastating, reinforced the Jewish people's unique connection to Israel, fueling the desire for self-determination and the modern Zionist movement. 



Edit post

#20 •••
@wylted

Most people are surplus to requirement.



And if one was a conspiracy theorist, one might suggest that there is a global conspiracy.


Though I still prefer to run with the Clever Stupid Gene theory....Which if you think about it, is perhaps the same as a global conspiracy, or more so, a greater universal evolutionary conspiracy...Wherein everything is dictated and irresistible.

Edit post

#21 •••
@SergeantLynch

Why are Jews hated?

The hatred of Jews, known as 

antisemitism, is a multifaceted and ancient phenomenon rooted in historical, religious, economic, and political factors that have evolved over millennia. It is not caused by the actions of Jewish people, but rather by the prejudices, delusions, and scapegoating by those who carry out the hatred. 

Key factors contributing to antisemitism throughout history include:

  1. Religious Animosity Early Christian theology played a significant role in fostering anti-Jewish sentiment by promoting the false narrative that Jews were collectively responsible for the death of Jesus (deicide). This led to centuries of persecution, discrimination, and the propagation of myths like the "blood libel" (accusations of using Christian children's blood for rituals). While many Christian denominations have since repudiated these charges, they formed a deep historical foundation for hatred.
  2. Scapegoating As a historically vulnerable minority group with an "outsider" status in many societies, Jews were frequently used as scapegoats for natural catastrophes, economic downturns, and military losses. For example, they were often blamed for the Black Death plague in the 14th century or Germany's defeat in World War I.
  3. Economic Stereotypes In medieval Europe, Jews were often legally barred from most occupations and owning land, forcing them into specific roles such as moneylending and commerce, which Christians were often prohibited from doing due to religious restrictions on usury. Their success in these areas, coupled with a need to collect debts, fueled resentment and gave rise to enduring, false stereotypes about Jewish greed and control over finances.
  4. Conspiracy Theories The idea that Jews secretly wield vast power and seek world domination is a persistent, yet baseless, conspiracy theory often spread through fraudulent documents like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. These theories adapt to different contexts, such as linking Jews to both capitalism and communism at different times.
  5. Racial and Nationalist Ideologies In the 19th and 20th centuries, religious antisemitism was compounded by racial antisemitism, which falsely categorized Jews as an inferior and dangerous race. This ideology was central to Nazism and the Holocaust, the systematic genocide of six million Jews.
  6. Modern Political Conflicts In contemporary times, while traditional forms of antisemitism persist, anti-Jewish sentiment can also manifest as extreme anti-Zionism, which denies Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state and holds all Jews collectively responsible for its actions, a standard not applied to other national or religious groups. 

Antisemitism endures by morphing and adapting its justifications to fit new historical and social circumstances, continuing to pose a threat to Jewish individuals and communities worldwide. Resources on understanding the history and forms of this prejudice are available from institutions like the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and the American Jewish Committee


Edit post

#22 •••
@Debby

What do you personally think?

Edit post

#23 •••
@Debby

I don't know if you have a good definition of Zionism

Edit post

#24 •••
@wylted

It's the 1-week Anniversary of the Bondi Beach Massacre, what will you be doing to celebrate?

Edit post

#25 •••
@Sidewalker
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#26 •••
@wylted

At the end of the day, thoughts and prayers are worth fu*k all.

Edit post

#27 •••
@SergeantLynch

A person who suppresses their thoughts and prayers, particularly in a religious or moral context, is often experiencing 

scrupulosity, a form of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). This condition involves unwanted, intrusive, and distressing thoughts (obsessions) that the individual attempts to neutralize through compulsive, often repetitive, prayers or mental rituals. 

Key aspects of this behavior include:

  1. Scrupulosity (Religious OCD): This is characterized by excessive guilt and worry that thoughts or behaviors are sinful, blasphemous, or improper.
  2. Neutralizing Compulsions: The person may feel driven to pray repeatedly or use specific phrases to "undo" or suppress the blasphemous/harmful thought.
  3. Paradoxical Effect: Attempts to forcefully suppress these thoughts often make them more frequent and intense, a phenomenon explained by "ironic process theory".
  4. Spiritual Bypassing: In some cases, this suppression is a defense mechanism where spiritual ideas are used to avoid facing deeper, unresolved emotional or psychological issues. 

Potential Consequences

  1. Increased Distress: Suppression often leads to higher anxiety and lower mood.
  2. Functional Impairment: The need to perform rituals can lead to avoiding worship, isolating from loved ones, and interfering with daily life.
  3. False Guilt: Individuals may mistake these intrusive thoughts for true moral failures. 

Treatment

Effective treatment often includes Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with an emphasis on Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP), which helps individuals learn to tolerate the anxiety caused by the thoughts without engaging in rituals. 


Edit post

#28 •••
@Debby

Thought is various data output relative to a process.


There is no such thing as a suppressed thought, as one either has a thought or one doesn't have a thought.


A prayer can be the same as a thought, but perhaps with a more specific content.


Or a prayer might be a repeated narrative.


But if one isn't prone to prayer thoughts, then one isn't


Though if one one were to read to much into the idea of non-thought or non-prayer, then one would, and it would be at this point that such thoughts might become worrisome...As it is I care not about not praying, but think regularly...In fact, not thinking is not easy.

Edit post

#29 •••
@SatanLucy

The problem isn't the number of people who reproduce, its who reproduces.

Edit post

#30 •••
@sadolite

I didnt reproduce yet, but maybe its best that I dont reproduce at all, given my disorders. I would hate if my offspring inherited my disorders. And inheriting my intelligence is unlikely.

Edit post