Oscar is pregnant?

On a fundamentally basic level, notwithstanding rare developmental anomalies...A woman produces eggs and a man produces sperm...Such is the nature of the human beast, irrespective of a surgeons knife a pharmacists pills or how said sperm ends up fertilizing said egg.

And "Hollowood" from what I can remember, certainly tended to churn out formulaically politized entertainment...But how else can they afford to make films?

And televised award ceremonies and parading luvvies pander to the needs of programmed sycophants and the gullible...Such it seems is a necessary human distraction.

If you filter out the stereotypical "us/them" hate rhetoric, this OP says two things:

1) this is what I saw on the Oscars last night.

2) I didn't watch the Oscars last night.

I suppose it makes MAGA sense.

They want you to guess what they saw last night.

They want you to guess what they saw last night.

He saw "motherhood" as a sign if TDS, I don't see how anyone could guess that.

As always, I think we are just supposed to say "WTF" when we read his posts.

You forget, or didn't know, that I grew up in LA, in Brentwood, mostly where Hollowood lived, then, and was mostly about movies, and little politics, but for a few fringe whackos, like Jane Fonda, and the focus of the Oscars was on the escape that Hollowood movies were. Not now. Now it is politics, and the movies are no longer escape, but agenda-driven. Why do you think I call it "Hollowood?"

If one reads carefully, I said I did not see the Oscars. What I saw, but did not mention, is a news program on local NBC, which broadcast some highlights, including the woman I reference who won an Oscar, and Fonda. MAGA, which I am not, has naught to do with it. Stop assuming, and read with a care to absorb.

I am not a "they." I use, as I should, traditional pronouns.

As always, I think we are just supposed to 

You may think and say whatever the hell you wish, but do not expect your brain and mouth are always correct.

OK, OK, so Fauxlaw didn't actually watch the Oscars, but he did receive the vicious motherhood slur against Trump on his headset.

That’s what content happiness looks like.

No I didn't forget and I understood the "Hollowood" thing.

What I would say, is that Hollywood movies were and still are escapist, and were and still are politicized.

It's just that you were younger then and are older now...Nonetheless you still retain your own idea of the American dream...The dream that Hollywood sold you all those years ago.

Trump still uses the Hollywood dream in his campaign speeches.

Trump thinks that he's a megastar.

His family is investing in drone technology so they can spread his message.

Yes, drones are popular.

But they have no experience in drone technology.

Who?

The Trump family who is getting into the drone business.

The Trump family are investors, they do not need to understand the technology...They only need to recognise the profitability.

That is why the crypto business is best suited for the Trump family.

Well, some might suggest that there is a better option.

But for now they can remain tolerant.

The acumen and sensibilities of subsequent dynastic generations will be key to their long term survival.

Whereas, Donald's internal system's decline will be the key to his short term survival.

SergeantLynch wrote:

The Trump family are investors, they do not need to understand the technology...They only need to recognise the profitability.

Yeah, and in a brilliant read of the market, they invested in US built drones right before Daddy imposed sweeping tariffs on foreign-made drones. As investors, they have great track record in predicting what Daddy is going to do, it's like they are prediction geniuses.

The markets predict the Trump family better like his 6 bankruptcies.