Maybe you should just accept it and you and SatanLucy can do your sexual infant thing without me.
I dont see whats so hard about saying "Maybe this infant circumcision thing and recording of it isnt as great idea as we thought".
Maybe you should just accept it and you and SatanLucy can do your sexual infant thing without me.
I dont see whats so hard about saying "Maybe this infant circumcision thing and recording of it isnt as great idea as we thought".
I dont see whats so hard about saying "Maybe this infant circumcision thing and recording of it isnt as great idea as we thought".
I don't see why you are obsessed with me joining you in your creepiness, what's so hard about leaving me out of it.
There are lots of people on this site, none of them has joined you in this particular creepiness, how about you go irritate one of them.
I don't see why you are obsessed with me joining you in your creepiness
You already joined in creepiness by choosing to argue against me. You could have simply said "Pedophilia is wrong, and circumcision videos are wrong.". I dont see why engage in defense of circumcision videos by proxy indirect attacks. Whatever you call me wont change what circumcision videos are. Is it me you are attacking, or arguments against circumcision videos?
You already joined in creepiness by choosing to argue against me. You could have simply said "Pedophilia is wrong, and circumcision videos are wrong.".
You are just making things up, and I don't appreciate you including me in your creepy fantasies. All I said was "Pedophilia is wrong and thinking sexual thoughts about infants is wrong", if this obsession with me is because you need my approval, well get over it.
I dont see why engage in defense of circumcision videos by proxy indirect attacks.
Probably because I haven't done so, that's just the role you have me playing in your creepy fantasy psychodrama. If you want to jack off to circumcision videos, go ahead, just keep me out of your pedophile fantasies.
Whatever you call me wont change what circumcision videos are. Is it me you are attacking, or arguments against circumcision videos?
It's pedophilia I'm disapproving of, so yeah, I guess that means it's you I'm attacking.
Probably because I haven't done so
It's pedophilia I'm disapproving of,
topic is circumcision, so make up your mind where you stand on that topic.
SatanLucy wrote:
topic is circumcision, so make up your mind where you stand on that topic.
That was the topic, now you've made me the topic with your latest sicko obsession, I always say "I don't see how he can be any creepier", and then wham, you come up with a new level of creepy.
You've creeped me out enough for today, go creep out somebody else now.
"That was the topic, now you've made me the topic"
Who made who the topic?
Check post 8.
SatanLucy wrote:
"That was the topic, now you've made me the topic"
Who made who the topic?
Check post 8.
Post 8? Is that the one where you said you like to jack off to circumcision videos?
Is that the one where you said you like to jack off to circumcision videos?
No, and I dont "like to jack off to circumcision videos".
SatanLucy wrote:
Is that the one where you said you like to jack off to circumcision videos?
No, and I dont "like to jack off to circumcision videos".
Then why did you say you jack off to circumcision videos?
Then why did you say you jack off to circumcision videos?
I didnt.
Ah, you participated again.
So when you see this reply, just ignore it.
Though your reticence can only lead one to conclude that you do actually support the right of adults to perform sexually motivated acts of ritual abuse on minors...Such is your own participation in the "sexual infant thing".
Though your reticence can only lead one to conclude that you do actually support the right of adults to perform sexually motivated acts of ritual abuse on minors...Such
I really don't understand people who support infant circumcision. They are worse than child spankers, who also apply sexual abuse by spanking child's butt, which is actually a sexual action in the same way grabbing girl's butt without consent is sexual harassment. One really needs to go a long way to justify doing to children what would be a huge crime if done to adults. Apparently, what is illegal to do to adult is entirely fine if done to child. So why is something which would be seen as terrible and harmful to do to adult seen as "okie dokie" if done to child? Does child have some immunity to harm which adult doesn't?
In USA, an 8 year old can be put on trial as adult.
So even tho an 8 year old doesn't have same legal rights as adult, on trial, he is considered adult.
This legal inconsistency is basically what allowed 8 year olds to be put on sex offender registry in USA.
Because law is an arbitrary whim of people who can't decide if 8 year old is clueless child or informed adult.
SergeantLynch wrote:
Ah, you participated again.
Yeah, I told SatanLucy to leave me alone, if you want to call that participating, fine, whatever floats your boat.
So when you see this reply, just ignore it.
Nope, as long as you continue making shit up to say about me, I’ll continue to respond to your nonsense.
Though your reticence can only lead one to conclude that you do actually support the right of adults to perform sexually motivated acts of ritual abuse on minors...Such is your own participation in the "sexual infant thing".
LOL, your obsession with me is very strong Grasshopper, perhaps you can take your own advice and “just ignore it”, but seeing as you can’t, let me try to explain again.
You probably can’t understand this, but nevertheless, I’m going to tell you about the real world, the one commonly referred to as “normal”.
I’m a father and a grandfather, three sons and two grandsons, and like all “normal” parents, I am constitutionally incapable of thinking about infants sexually, no matter how much you insist, like all “normal” parents, I don’t want to do it, I can’t do it, and I won’t do it. I’m sorry that upsets you, I’m afraid you are just going to take your own advice and “just ignore it”.
Now, in regard to your inane logic that “theoretically” my refusal to participate is a form of participation, I think the extent to which a normal parent would participate in this creepiness, the instinctive reaction parents have to the "sexual infant thing", is a strong desire to protect their children from such people. Like all parents here in the normal world, I would want to beat the shit out of any person doing that “sexual infant thing” if they so much as touched any of my kids or grandkids when they were infants.
So, there you go, theoretically, like any parent, I’m participating, happy now?
I would want to beat the shit out of any person doing that “sexual infant thing”
I dont advocate for violence against circumcisers. Circumcision just needs to be made illegal.
SatanLucy wrote:
I dont advocate for violence against circumcisers.
Of course not, you like to watch circumcision porn.
Circumcision just needs to be made illegal.
Why don't you just stop whacking off to circumcision videos.
Why don't you just stop whacking off to circumcision videos.
Actually, I am a victim of circumcision myself. tho my circumcision was worse because it gone wrong and left me with bent dick.
SatanLucy wrote:
Actually, I am a victim of circumcision myself. tho my circumcision was worse because it gone wrong and left me with bent dick.
TMI
Okay, but one again typical avoidance strategy.
So let me just put the question to you very simply.
Do you support the ritual circumcision of infants?
Yes or no.
Do you support the ritual circumcision of infants?
That is a too difficult question for Sidewalker to answer. If he answers "no", he is agreeing with me, which is impermissible. If he says "yes", he is agreeing with sexual abuse of infants, which is also impermissible.
SergeantLynch wrote:
Okay, but one again typical avoidance strategy.
Gee, you think so? I tried to explain the normal world to you, but as I suspected, you just don't get it, fact is, almost all parents avoid thinking about infants in a sexual manner, and we think it's creepy when you do it.
So let me just put the question to you very simply.
OK, but I'll put a question to you very simply also. Why do you enjoy having sexual thoughts about infants?
Do you support the ritual circumcision of infants?
Yes or no.
All three of my sons were circumcised, so yes, but that doesn't mean it's OK for you to start sharing your sexual thoughts about my sons when they were infants. Try to dial down the creepy.
All three of my sons were circumcised
So much for "wah wah wah".


SatanLucy wrote:
That is a too difficult question for Sidewalker to answer.
Nope, it's real simple question that I've answered multiple times already, you are just too stupid and perverted to understand it.
If he answers "no", he is agreeing with me, which is impermissible. If he says "yes", he is agreeing with sexual abuse of infants, which is also impermissible.
No, what I've been saying all along is that you are a sick fuck for thinking of infants as sex objects, so it doesn't really matter how I answer Sarge's question, I'm not agreeing with your perverted way of looking at infants.
You can claim anything you want; you can whack off to circumcision videos all day long for all I care, I'm just not going to be a part of your fucking freakshow.
No, what I've been saying all along is that you are a sick fuck for thinking of infants as sex objects
No, I dont circumcise infants to alter their sexual functions for religious or arbitrary purposes.
SatanLucy wrote:
So much for "wah wah wah".
So much for a pedophile that thinks of infants as sex objects.
Do you whack off to potty training videos too, or is it just circumcision porn that makes your keyboard sticky?
SatanLucy wrote:
No, I dont circumcise infants to alter their sexual functions for religious or arbitrary purposes.
Nobody thinks you actually circumcise infants, what is creepy is that you want to fuck infants.
I dont see why engage in defense of circumcision videos by proxy indirect attacks.
Probably because I haven't done so

Nobody thinks you actually circumcise infants, what is creepy is that you want to fuck infants.
Who told you that? Same God who told you to circumcise infants to alter their sexual function because he accidentally created foreskin when he didnt mean to?
Apparently, we were made in God's image, except the foreskin.
Yes or no, do you miss your friends from prison?
