Donald "Bone Spurs" Trump threatens war on Chicago, commits act of war against Venezuela.

Sure, both actions are illegal, but hey, at least he gave the Trumpers a big erection.

That's all that matters.

Trump is less limited by his bone spurs as president.

Trump is more limited by his small brain as president.

Doctors removed the left half of a guy's brain and told him to count to ten. He counts 2, 4, 6, 8, 10.

Then they put the left half back in, removed the right half of his brain, and told him to count to ten. He counts 1, 3, 5, 7, 9.

Then they removed his entire brain and told him to count to ten. He says, "Look, we're gonna count to ten. Ten is a yuge number. I know numbers. I have the best numbers. All the politicians in Washington can't count to ten. Believe me: I've counted to ten many, many times. I will be the best count-to-tenner that God ever created. Everybody, count to ten, okay? We are gonna count to so many tens, I tell you!"

I bet Melania counted to 10 many times.

It never ceases to amaze me that, at least 11 years ago, Trump was bestowed the moniker of "Bone Spurs" by a jealous media that an ordinary person of wealth was given a draft deferment in the period of 1964 - 1973, when more than half of people eligible for military draft were given draft deferment. So, why Trump? Because he was wealthy? Because he dared enter politics at a presidential level without a background in politics? As if that pursuit is the Holy Grail. Because his ideas didn't conform to the media's idea of proper governance? As if the media deserves to have that kind of oversight. Because he was not a moral man? And who is of presidential pursuit? Thanks, but I already have a moral advisor, and he's been around a lot longer that any other moral advisor around, and so do y'all, whether y'all realize it and appreciate it, or not. We don't needs one in the presidency.

"Trump has made a military strike against a small Venezuelan boat with no evidence whatsoever that it involved drugs, gangs, or any other reason to strike it in international waters"

The intelligence/law enforcement community hasn't (yet) released whatever evidence led it to the conclusion that this ship was involved in drug trafficking, therefore no evidence must exist!

The same reasoning applies to every single operation conducted during the War on Terror, regardless of whether Bush or Obama was president! There was never a single ISIS militant bombed, it was always just killing of random people for the lulz! Why? Because the military hasn't met my arbitrary demand of declassifying and publicizing how it came to the decision to drop every individual bomb that it dropped! Since they haven't done so, there must therefore be no evidence of a legitimate legitimate War on Terror having ever happened! I haven't seen it, and so it mustn't exist!

Who knew all those Venezuelans in that boat had serious friends in Murica.

I'm glad that Trump is changing the name of the DoD to the DoWar. It's honest.

The military did the exact same thing while being called the DOD. If you don't like it, then maybe abolish the military worldwide. Defense is a euphemism for war.

No, it didn't, the DoD was never deployed against the American people for political purposes.

Tell us just how much you love Venezuelans in boats.

Character assassination , name calling , insults, intimidation, threats of violence. All monikers of a person with a weak and undefendable opinion, idea or political position. That's why Kirk was killed, he was effective at exposing the clown show.

-> No, it didn't, the DoD was never deployed against the American people for political purposes.

But the DoW was, correct? And the only difference is a name change.

LOL, you really are dumber than a post.

Try reading out loud, slowly for comprehension, or maybe ask someone to read it to you this time.

This is the first time in history the US Military has been deployed against US citizens for political purposes; it is a dramatic and unprecedented difference.

So no, the astoundingly stupid statement that "the only difference is a name change" does not follow logically, it is just an astoundingly stupid statement.

You like to mislabel stupid posts as "rage bait", which is a comical misrepresentation, maybe you should try labeling posts as "See what a dumbshit I am bait" instead, at least it would be honest.

Because he was not a moral man? And who is of presidential pursuit? Thanks, but I already have a moral advisor, and he's been around a lot longer that any other moral advisor around, and so do y'all, whether y'all realize it and appreciate it, or not. We don't needs one in the presidency.

If, as you say, your so called "moral advisor" guides you to elect and support an immoral, lawless leader, then your moral advisor is shit.

Are you so morally bankrupt that you do not even know what a moral advisor is supposed to do? If it isn't guiding you to act morally and make moral decisions, then what? It isn't just a name you invoke to justify your immoral actions.

If, as you say, your so called "moral advisor" guides you to elect and support an immoral, lawless leader, then your moral advisor is shit.

Which is why typical if/then logic is shit, itself.

Misuse of "if," which automatically implied that the "if" statement is currently not true, which it never is. That's how to begin a logical statement? Nope.

The proper constructions is "because/then". Get it?

My moral advisor is Jesus Christ. He does not advise election of anybody because that is entirely my choice, and he respects my agency of free will.

There was drugs on the boat they literally have the means to watch the boat from outer space and just zoom in on shit and why are you literally defending people attempting to harm americans by bringing crack cocaine here?

@#8

While I 'do think there 'might have been drugs, and 'maybe the intelligence/law enforcement community hasn't (yet) released whatever evidence.

I imagine we'd have more evidence if they'd not blown the ship up, but had instead boarded it and arrested the people.

"Trump claimed the boat was operated by the Tren de Aragua gang, which was listed by the U.S. as foreign terrorist organization earlier this year."

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-s-carried-out-3rd-fatal-strike-on-alleged-drug-smuggling-boat-in-the-caribbean-trump-says

It feels a bit as though they were classified as terrorists 'just so they could be hit in such a way legally. Rather than fitting the mold of most terrorists, maybe.

. . .

What about due process?

If we have the ability to easily capture a criminal or enemy,

I might rather we did.

Rather than Bonnie and Clyde them, or Duterte Philippines War on Drugs them.

They blew up another boat full of drugs. I am sure your country is in tears for the loss of mind-numbing product.

No we support American grown drugs like Meth, marijuana and Cheesecake

Now Trump can reduce his tariff of drugs imported to the states.

The tariff is a guided missile.

Trump should raise tariffs on states just like he does on countries to improve the U.S. economy.

He could raise the stakes by launching more missiles to tariff boats importing drugs.

Trump is waiting to be awarded the Nobel peace prize. The war on drugs will have to wait.