RIP Lindsay Graham. the most Gangsta senator

So the left strikes again.

You misspelled cardiovascular disease.

wylted wrote:

He died btw one hour before it was time to pass the SAVE act and he was badly needed. So the left strikes again. Worse the strike against America to pass the save act which prevents foreigners from voting in American elections

It's already illegal for foreigners to vote in American elections, and it's been proven conclusively that there was no foreigner voting in the 2020 election, that false claim is just an excuse for attacking the electoral process and engaging in voter suppression.

and it's been proven conclusively that there was no foreigner voting in the 2020 election,

If you are going to push propaganda, at least make it plausible.

https://www.facebook.com/ABCNews/photos/about-6600-people-in-new-jersey-who-said-they-were-not-us-citizens-had-been-inco/1475708247749384/

"It NEVER happened" ..."It's not happening now." "Okay, it's happening; but just barely." "Okay it's happening, and it's widespread, but here's why it's a good thing."

It's already illegal for foreigners to vote in American elections

The SAVE Act isn't writing a new law or overriding existing law. It's creating enforcement for an existing law.

 and engaging in voter suppression.

Illegal voters should be suppressed in a functioning democracy.

Shoresy wrote:

and it's been proven conclusively that there was no foreigner voting in the 2020 election,

If you are going to push propaganda, at least make it plausible.

https://www.facebook.com/ABCNews/photos/about-6600-people-in-new-jersey-who-said-they-were-not-us-citizens-had-been-inco/1475708247749384/

"It NEVER happened" ..."It's not happening now." "Okay, it's happening; but just barely." "Okay it's happening, and it's widespread, but here's why it's a good thing."

Oh pulease, I know that story gave all you MAGA guys an erection but maybe take a cold shower or just go ahead and whack off about it, and then maybe you can get real about how irrelevant that story really is.

First, it occurred in 2023, and it was for a New Jersey election for Governor in 2024, it was not 2020 and not an election for President. NJ Governor Mikie Sherrill announced that yes, around 6,600 non-citizens were accidentally registered to vote due to a technical error, only around 400 of those individuals actually voted, this isolated incident was inconsequential.

What we are talking about is the 2020 Presidential Election, clearly the most secure and legitimate election in US history. Of course, the two elections Trump won were valid, and the one he lost was “rigged”, and to prove it, Trump and his charlatans brought 62 lawsuits, all of which were dismissed because there was no evidence, and no merit to the lie they were perpetrating. All of Trump’s first-term attorneys general—Jeff Sessions (who Trump fired for disloyalty), William Barr, and acting AG Jeffrey Rosen—all rejected Trump’s dishonest claims of 2020 election fraud. Trump ordered William Barr to “produce” evidence of election fraud, he investigated and found no evidence on consequential voter fraud and then resigned under pressure from an enraged Trump. Acting AG Jeffrey Rosen was under intense pressure from Trump to subvert the results and he refused to deny our democratic process. Even his violent insurrection couldn’t subvert the election results, the simple undeniable fact is 2020 was a free, fair, and secure election, clearly the most legitimate election in US history as a response to the fact that Trump had been laying the groundwork for his autocratic challenge to our democratic for months prior to the election.

Trump and his minions launched a coordinated campaign to spread falsehoods about the security and accuracy of the election, they lied about the safety of voting machines, mail voting, foreign interference, and voter rolls. Despite six years of relentless lies and Presidential intimidation, no court has ever found those claims—or the election conspiracy theories they’re based on—to be true, and no audit has found a trace of widespread voter fraud. The only people that have been fooled by this lie are Trump's beloved "poorly educated".

Face it, this nonsense about fraud is just a contrived justification for Trump and his sycophant’s attack on democracy, you can make up reasons to validate your agenda, but in the end, you just prefer authoritarianism over democracy, you have chosen fascism over diversity.

She was believable, unlike your post.

The only people that have been fooled by this lie are Trump's beloved "poorly educated".

Then you should support the SAVE Act, as it will quickly destroy MAGA when the poorly educated can't even use Google to get a voter ID instead of lying again to make fake friends. Or is your next big lie going to be that you have to stop the Save Act because you really love MAGA people?

you have chosen fascism over diversity.

Lol, diversity is straight-up Hitler fascism when one so-called skin-race is always excluded under the modern definition of diversity. Especially when there were fascist authoritarian laws before the Supreme Court struck down all the racist DEI authoritarian laws thanks to your 14th Amendment.

Shoresy wrote:

She was believable, unlike your post.

Yes, she was believable, and what she said had nothing whatsoever to do with the 2020 election. What is unbelievable is that Trump’s poorly educated can’t grasp that simple fact.

The only people that have been fooled by this lie are Trump's beloved "poorly educated".

Then you should support the SAVE Act, as it will quickly destroy MAGA when the poorly educated can't even use Google to get a voter ID instead of lying again to make fake friends. Or is your next big lie going to be that you have to stop the Save Act because you really love MAGA people?

MAGA is already dead, Trump has the lowest polls ever, our enemies and our allies are done with him, even his personal judicial branch is fed up with his blatently illegal nonsense. In the midterms, there is a blue tsunami coming that will wash away the rotting remains of MAGA. After that debacle, republican politicians will be more afraid of the voters than they are of Trump. His only hope, and what I think he fully intends to do, is use the military to overthrow our democratic process, fortunately, our military is more honorable than that. It’s time to put a fork in it, MAGA is done.

you have chosen fascism over diversity.

Lol, diversity is straight-up Hitler fascism when one so-called skin-race is always excluded under the modern definition of diversity. Especially when there were fascist authoritarian laws before the Supreme Court struck down all the racist DEI authoritarian laws thanks to your 14th Amendment.

LOL, I forgot your white supremacist and Christian Nationalist handlers have convinced you guys that it’s your Aryan race have always been the victims of racism, you guys are just a poorly educated bad joke.

Sorry pumpkin, the world has changed, and like the dinosaurs, you guys just can’t adapt and so you are in the process of going extinct, and it’s for the same reason as the dinosaurs went extinct, because you have a brain the size of a walnut.

Lol, you called me everything but a liar.

And you now support the Save Act, noted.

Feel free to select a lie:

1) MAGA are too stupid to get an ID.

2) I want to oppose the Save Act because I love MAGA and want it to surge.

Shoresy wrote:

Lol, you called me everything but a liar.

What, did I forget to call you a liar, shit, that's just an oversight.

I blame the gummy.

Trump is obviously trying to disenfranchise voters n before the midterms

If Republicans sincerely wanted more security in identification they'd allow time to let people do it their way, not sabotage the election

Democrats aren't opposed to id being used in voting just not sabotaging the process

There's barely any election fraud so its an insincere attempt at disenfranchisement

If you're explaining it to a Republican in good faith, the strongest Democratic arguments are generally not that they support non-citizen voting (which is already illegal in federal elections), but that they think the SAVE Act creates unnecessary barriers for eligible citizens.

Here's how Democrats typically explain their opposition:

1. Non-citizen voting is already illegal. They argue federal law already prohibits it, and that documented cases of non-citizens voting are very rare.
2. Proof-of-citizenship requirement. The SAVE Act would require documentary proof of citizenship (such as a passport, birth certificate, or certain naturalization documents) when registering to vote in federal elections. Democrats argue that millions of eligible Americans don't readily have these documents.
3. Name-change issues. Married women who changed their last name may have birth certificates that don't match their current legal name. Democrats argue this could complicate registration unless they can produce additional documentation.
4. Administrative burden. Election officials might face more paperwork, costs, and delays in processing registrations.
5. Risk of disenfranchisement. Democrats believe even a relatively small number of eligible voters being unable to register is a serious problem, especially if they are elderly, low-income, rural, or frequently move.

See above