Clueless

Started by ebuc

Replies
26
Posts
27
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 β€’β€’β€’

So whom do others think some members are pretty much clueless on here at DArt?


I fear mentioning their names for fear of clueless response or worse, repeated, long ass. non-identifed AI info posting, that, of course can have errors.


Sometime errors may be considered via logical common sense critical thinking as that is often the quickest easy way, however, it does take some time and effort to attempt logical, common sense critical thinking.



Edit comment

#2 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

If you can’t name them, you must be clueless yourself. Another sign your topic was left unanswered because most were clueless. Hint, hint.

Edit post

#3 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc
repeated, long ass. non-identifed AI info posting


You mean like https://www.debatecraft.com/forum/c/philosophy/posts/lg/finite-vs-infinite

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#4 β€’β€’β€’
@fauxlaw

Yeah the longest post in that thread --and is AI--- is not by me.


Usually any AI info me are:


1} marked as AI at beginning followed by,


2} a starting quotation mark and ending quotation make...' ... Hi ( ^ v ^)....' .....is shorter blurbs of info.


If my info shared whether AI or not, is incorrect, please let me know.



Edit post

#5 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Did I say your post was the longest in the thread? No, just agreeing ir was long.


Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#6 β€’β€’β€’
@fauxlaw

If info I ever present incorrect, whether AI or not, , please let me know with logical common sense critical thinking.

Edit post

#7 β€’β€’β€’


Edit post

#8 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Nor did I argue that the the post was incorrect, I just acknowledged it was AI-esque, so no further critical thinking, common or not, necessary.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#9 β€’β€’β€’
@fauxlaw
Nor did I argue that the the post was incorrect, I just acknowledged it was AI-esque, so no further critical thinking, common or not, necessary.


Cause/Action > reaction/response > Resultants/consequences > repeat eternally


Logic > common sense > critical thinking > repeat eternally


Creative > art/jokes etc > fun/enjoyment > repeat eternally


.<--macro-micro-infinite-->....@....<--micro-macro-infinite--> repeat eternally


@ = finite, occupied space Universe


In = --->inward<----


Out = <---outward--->


Around = ( ) and always dynamically falling inward, outward or alternating in between both


Perfection { idealized symmetry } as sphere, circle, triangle etc is always a meta-space concept only, never the occupied space existence parts of Universe, that, is composed of ultra-high powering set of overlapping, interfering, dual invaginated, space and time tori. Or so I speculate


.....( (|) ).......... two overlapping, bilateral{ left and right } sphericals at peak of entropic heat death of Universe.


| = ultra-large, ultra-long wave{ frequency } singular photon { EMRadiation } ergo what is left of our physical reality aka observed { quantised } time. Or so I speculate.


The two ultra-large sphericals are primarily Gravity and Dark Energy at outer and inner surface of the aforementioned dual invaginated, space and time tori, however, as to whether is there exist any invagination into the internal body --that of the singular photon-- of the tori is question-alble to me at this time, beyond


First I thought maybe virtual particles, and then when Googled that, I got response that virtual particles can only co-incide with real particles.


Ok if no virtual particles, then other than Gravity and Dark Energy might be internal to the ultra-large, tori defined, sphericals { think B Fullers 62 primary-2ndary etc ) 2D great circles{ 3D space and time tori }.


Dark Matter? Well matter = Fermionic Matter ergo, physical reality { observed time }.


Maybe only Gravity and Dark Energy exist as occupied space with the bilateral set of ultra-large, ultra-micro-frequency { 3 cyclic frequency }, non-invaginated, closest-packed set of 18/0{ 3 cyclic fre. }. More speculation.


...ooooooooooooooooo... = non-overlapping, ultra-close packed set of 18/0, 3 cyclic fre. non-invaginated, space and time tori.


If the Gravity and Dark Energy only, non-invaginated, space and time tori are only tangent, to each other --instead of overlapping-- then perhaps their could exist truly non-occupied space in the gaps created by tangent tori. Probably more likely they are overlapping { ...( ( ) )( ( ) (.. } etc. I dunno.

Edit post

#10 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Another AI-esque. TLTR

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#11 β€’β€’β€’
@fauxlaw

Your occupied space is filled with dark matter. That is the conclusion drawn.

Edit post

#12 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Sorry, but my occupied space is filled with light, which is substance. The dark is not just absence of light, but absent of anything; it is absence of substance. So, wrong conclusion. It happens.


Here is an experiment you can do at home, assuming you have a hallway and at least one room off the hallway, and there needs to be a room light controlled by a switch and a door to the room from the hall. The hallway may also have such a light, or not; doesn't matter, but should not have a window to outside. This experiment is best done at night. Inside the room, close the door and turn on the light. Now, open the door. Does darkness in the hallway invade the room, or does the light in the room invade the darker hallway. That should tell you everything you need to know about dark and light.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#13 β€’β€’β€’
@fauxlaw

Lucky for us, great minds in the past have made known to us, through rigorous analysis, that neither darkness nor light is a substance.

Edit post

#14 β€’β€’β€’
@fauxlaw

Try checking your facts before posting rubbish.


Light does not occupy space in the same way solid matter does. Unlike objects that have mass and take up volume, light is composed of photons-massless particles- that can coexist , allowing for an infinite amount of light to fill a given space without occupying it.


Edit post

#15 β€’β€’β€’
@UmbrellaCorp, @fauxlaw
dark and light.


You left out the the word matter as in Dark Matter not just the lack of light. Ergo Faux, if you want to consider a scientific approach then you need to drop the word ' dark ' { a lack of light shadow }, by itself only, from your approach and actually consider Fermionic Matter.


This is why since in 90's there was experiments to see if it DMatter could be neutrinos { F. matter particles }. No, so the most recent thing is a kind of revisoning of Ed Wittens ideas.


AI...Google search .' Edward Witten's 1984 scenario, commonly known as the

Quark Nugget (QN) hypothesis, proposes that dark matter is not a new elementary particle but rather macroscopic, dense clusters of strange quark matter (a mix of up, down, and strange quarks) formed during the QCD phase transition in the early universe '..


Here Sabine Hossenfelder explaining revisioning of this Witten idea. Go to 6:14 time to get the final gist of this scenario.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffLDGr2pW0Q



Edit post

#16 β€’β€’β€’

While the QN hypothesis is a compelling candidate for explaining both dark matter and the matter-antimatter asymmetry , it remains a high-risk unproven theory that requires further observational confirmation.

Edit post

#17 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Photons, themselves, are not "solid matter," but the charged particles of solid matter too which they attach, and causes them to glow across the entire light spectrum are. Not rubbish. Yes, there are photons that do notattacah to solid mass particles. So what? The experiment I described is still valid because darkness is not matter, nor energy.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#18 β€’β€’β€’
@fauxlaw

You are confusing dark matter with darkness.

#11 β€œYour occupied space is filled with dark matter. That is the conclusion drawn.”

Edit post

#19 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Particles are as particles do.

Edit post

#20 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
Particles are as particles do.


Official Doo wap music of 50's and 60's. They were clueless to the future coming technology, just as much as we are today clueless to future music.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxJ6UFGpRio&list=PLqkyU9sNsyatBLi5LXoo1Ccg-aY1fpGtD&index=4

Edit post

#21 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

Difference between Dark matter and Darkspace.

Darkspace is simply empty, void-like space between galaxies, while dark matter is an invisible , unknown form of mass that acts as a cosmic glue to hold galaxies together. Darkspace is essentially emptiness whereas dark matter has gravity and affects the structure of the universe.

Edit post

#22 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

So the theory goes.

Edit post

#23 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch
So the theory goes


The wheels on the bus go round and round round and round,


So early in the morning


The wipers on the bus go swish, swish, swish

Swish, swish, swish,

Swish, swish, swish.

Edit post

#24 β€’β€’β€’

That is on rainy days.

Edit post

#25 β€’β€’β€’
@ebuc

Sorry, I do not read or understand most of what you say because of the symbol syntax in which you write.

Edit post

#26 β€’β€’β€’
@Skipper

I love you guys in thaw cartoon movies. Thumbs ^ !

Edit post

#27 β€’β€’β€’

Smile and ~ boys. Smile and ~

Edit post