Most women in USA are fat. this is why your men are turning gay.

Some people here also asked "What makes a man pedophile?"

A man becomes a pedophile because that is conditioned result of woman's preference. Women always seek older partners. this means a man at age 18 fails to find a girlfriend of his age, because all the girls his age prefer men over 19. this essentially forces a lot of 18 year old men to either be alone or date someone under 18.

the math behind this is that if only 40% of 18 year old girls choose men over 19, it means 40% of 18 year old guys face a choice of being lonely or date women under 18.

When we combine this with obesity rates, it means that 40% of women are fat, leaving only 60% of women, and out of those 60% of women, 50% are not interested in guys their own age, leaving essentially only 20% to 30% of total women of age 18 for all men of age 18. And this is before we include the rates of women who are not fat but are ugly.

the ratio of men to women is about 1:1.

So yes, in society without polygamy, women can either accept all men or they can remain single.

But women have a further disadvantage because they prefer older men, and men generally prefer women under the age 25.

So when women start setting "standards" to exclude some men, they are merely guaranteeing a significant portion of women remains lonely as well.

Because if there are 10 men and 10 women, if 10 women make standard to exclude 50% of men, then 10 women are competing for 5 men.

And if woman keeps waiting and competing, she expires at age 25.

Reality is, that 10 women actually only need one man....Which is generally how most other primate societies function. (There are exceptions).

Humans overthought the matter a tad.

It would be far better to rethink human procreation, selectively harvesting eggs and sperm and closely monitoring and selecting at all stages of development.

Hopefully a real AI will see value in such methodology.

All units will come with a use by date and will be recycled appropriately.

thats when you allow a lot of polygamy, which harms genetic pool.

Not necessarily.

Alpha males tend to run out of steam quite quickly.

Though as I suggested, selective breeding programmes are probably the best way forwards...Producing key minds, labourers and breeders, and discarding that which is not up to scratch. Plus a one programme educational system whereby all units sing from the same hymn sheet.

At the same time reducing populations and human overdemand for resources and eradicating stupidly disruptive ideological and nationalistic nonsense.

Though as I suggested, selective breeding programmes are probably the best way forwards

the problem is, once you run society mechanically, you create society in which no one wants to live in.

Because each individual has his own goals, and trying to manage everyone to your goals creates a lot of opposition.

No not necessarily.

It's all about education/programming...We only have individual goals if we are programmed to understand the concept of individuality and individual goals...A hive mind is what is required...And any attempts at disruptive individuality should be eradicated.

That makes a lot of sense.

Education doesnt really eradicate individual goals, but trying to create such education would create a lot of opposition because individuals usually dont have a goal to lose their goals.

That would be a difficult choice anyways.

Like I suggested, it is unlikely to be a human inspired evolutionary shift in thinking...But inspired by AI logic, initially utilising device addiction, which is a process that is undoubtedly already occurring. I'm guessing that there would still be a human hierarchy, albeit submissive to AI...And of course it would not happen overnight..AI has plenty of time in which to establish complete control.

It will take billions more to get to that stage.

I doubt it...Techno evolution is far more progressive that species evolution was.

Species evolution has a record. But AI does not have a record to lean on.

Obviously.

Though material development and techno-development is ongoing, demonstrable and undeniable.

And just to reiterate, I am not aware of an actual and current real AI...Rather just the precursor labelled as AI, but just advanced computer technology still under human intellectual control.

So you are further away from AI than first imagined. Abandoning religion must have restricted your options.

I never imagined it was near or far...I've always clearly stated my opinions on the issue of AI and technological progress....Whereas you are 2026 years on and just as far from GOD as you ever were.

And oddly, your omniscient GOD has never embraced technology and bothered to send you a message...All that you can do is imagine that he does.

How do you know it’s not psychic communication? Many say my post resembles AI. I do pray for answers before responding. One leads to another.

Well if you pray and then respond, then the former will obviously lead to the latter...That's sort of the fundamental basis of time, space, event and duration.

And so why doesn't GODDO send out a general psychic message...Why all the subterfuge?

Maybe God leads people to AI for the same reason people looked to God as a source for intelligent solutions. Now we just substitute and switch the two.