42 Answer to Everything

Started by ebuc

Replies
29
Posts
30
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข

Pi truncated to the 9th { free agent?} irrational digit = 3.14 15 92 65 3


3.14 15 92 65 3 ^3{ XYZ } = 31.00 62 76 66 2


3.14 15 92 65 3 ^4{ XYZ-time } = 97.40 90 90 96 0


....> or as a spatial 4th d { abc and 45 degree hyper-dimensional d-iagonal in abc/XYZ cube }


3.14 15 92 65 3 ^4{ abc-diagonal } = 97.40 90 90 96 0


97.40 90 90 96 0 minus 31.00 62 76 66 2 { XYZ } = 66.40 28 14 29 8 < { < Cosmic Pi-Time < }


97.40 90 90 96 0 minus 42 = 55.40 90 90 96 { Fibonnaci's 11th number is 55 }

..note: AI..' The golden ratio (phi, or ฯ† โ‰ˆ 1.618) is directly related to the Fibonacci sequence because the ratio of consecutive Fibonacci numbers converges to phi as the numbers get larger.'...


... > alternatively


66.40 28 14 29 8 minus 24.40 28 14 29 8 = 42


..> alternatively we attempt re-normalization { to make it XYZ aka 3D } of the 4th D as time resultant 97.40 90 90 96 0 via division by 4


97.40 90 90 96 0 / 4 = 24.35 22 7 27 4 { note 7 falls in overall 7th position as it also does with the XYZ 31.00 62 7 66 62 and recall that 4 * 6 = 24 and 7 * 6 = 42 }


....> now we take value subtract value 24.35 22 7 27 4 from Cosmic Pi-Time > 66.40 28 14 29 8


66.40 28 14 29 8 minus 24.35 22 7 27 4 = 42.05 05 41 55 8


...> note: Additional cosmic geometric details:


1} the 5-fold symmetry of the regular icosahedron has 31 left-skew and right-skew, primary great circles as it develops from left and right spin contractions of the 4-fold symmetry of the cubo-octahedron --See LINK left and right figure B-- and complex humans, as well as some other animals, have 31 bilateral spinal nerves so total 62 spinal nerves { 31.00 62 7 66 62 },


..> note: icosahedron has three sets of primary great circles 6..10..15, that, total 31 and the following has four sets of primary great circles, so total is 7 primary sets of great circles of Universe


2} the 4-fold symmetry cubo-octahedron aka 12-around-1 equal radius spheres, aka teh Vector Equlibrium { VE } and Fuller states the closet we will come to knowing God, because the VE has 24 circumferential chords and 24 radii, when composed from four planar pieces of paper etc.


..> note: the 4-fold, four sets of primary great circles are 3...4...6...12 and the above mentioned 5-fold set are 6...10...15, again that is total of seven sets of primary great circles of Universe, or, in my cosmic explorations, primary great space and time horn tori


3} 42 is related to triangulation via the six and primes via the 7p and six is combination of 3p doubled/addition


4} 42 is related to 2p { 2 * 21 }, 3p { 3 * 14 }, 6 { 6 * 7p }


5} 42 minus 11 = 31p-rime


6} 42 minus 24 = 18 and there exists 18 combination kinds of quark and 18 anti-quarks of Universe see following link

https://www.quora.com/How-many-kinds-of-quarks-are-there-Is-there-anything-smaller-than-a-quark

Edit comment

#2 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข

Well, we know that 45-47 is the answer to nothing.

Edit post

#3 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@FLRW

That is the price for Trump phones.

Edit post

#4 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@ebuc

Is naming quarks something like an Adam complex?

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#5 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@fauxlaw

The ADAM complex, or Amniotic Deformity, Adhesions, Mutilations Complex, is a congenital condition characterized by limb abnormalities like constriction bands and amputations, often accompanied by craniofacial defects such as cleft lip and palate, or other malformations of the chest and abdomen. While the exact cause is unknown, theories suggest intrinsic factors (like a germ plasm defect) or extrinsic factors, such as amniotic bands entrapping the fetus and restricting blood flow, leading to the various deformities. The severity varies greatly, affecting the function and aesthetics of the affected infant. 





Edit post

#6 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@fauxlaw
Is naming quarks something like an Adam complex?


Huh? I didnt name any quarks. I presented how many kinds of quark { 18 } and anti-quark { 18 } combinations.

Edit post

#7 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข

We need more specificity.

Edit post

#8 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@ebuc

There is no one answer to everything.

Edit post

#9 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SatanLucy

A universal religion is the single answer to everything.

Edit post

#10 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข

7p + 7p = 14 { and 3 * 14 = 42 } as does 7p * 6 = 42 < and > 42 = 21 + 21


However, 7p + 5p add to 12 { see below commonality of 12 } --go to this v link v at time stamp 3:00 and see how 7p and 5p have intimately complex personality on a guitar, compared to simplex on piano. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuHDR3E_25s

.

42 / 12 = 3.5, so 12 and 42 are not rationally commensurate operations mathematically. 3 * 12 is 6 short of 42.


12 is most common number to most fundamental initial set of polyhedra


..> 3-fold tetrahedron 12 angles,


..> 4-fold cube 12 edges - 24 angles,


..> 4-fold octahedron 12 edges - 24 angles, { regular symmetrical }


..> truncated tetrahedron 12* vertexes 18 edges - 36 angles,


..> 4-fold cubo-octahedron 12* vertexes - 24 - edges - 48 angles, { asymmetrical }


...> 4-fold Rhombic dodecahedron 12 face/openings - 24 edges, { asymmetrical }


...> 5-fold pentagonal dodecahedron 12 faces/openings - 20 vertexes - 30 edges - *60 surface angles, { regular symmetrical }


...> 5-fold icosahedron 12* vertexes - 20 faces/openings - 30 edge - *60 surface angles, { regular symmetrical }

Edit post

#11 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข

What is the question?

Edit post

#12 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch

That's the question these answers cant answer. Great rebuttal.

Edit post

#13 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch
What is the question?


What is the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything"

Edit post

#14 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Sidewalker

What is indeed.


And numbers are an intelligent concept relative to quantity and perceptual ability.


So if everything is infinitely fractional, what is 1?


Though if everything isn't infinitely fractional then it must reach 0 eventually.

Edit post

#15 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Sidewalker
What is the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything"


To ponder aka to consider and re-ponder aka re-consider Life, Universe and Everything.


Meta-space abstract maths via meta-space abstract language communications --becoming more universality English-- is the avenue aka pathways that humans have most complex access to.


..." Voyager 1972 sees one mile high tetrahedron on Mars .


..In 1977 the NASA scientists scrutinized the robot-photographed pictures of the close-in Martian scene and reported the to them surprise presence on Mars of two (two-mile-base-edged) three-sided pyramids the size of Mount Fuji. The NASA scientists were unfamiliar with the tetrahedron.


..They remarked that these forms, with whose simplest, primitive character they were unacquainted, must have been produced by wind-blown sand erosion, whereas we have discovered that tetrahedra are always and only a priori to nature's processes of alteration of her simplest and most primitive polyhedral systems. ' taken from Synertics 2 by B Fuller...


http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s09/figs/f86052.html

Edit post

#16 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข

I remember this guy. He uses numbers and concepts more than english. His safe space is in forums.


Really, you need to move on from nonsensical usage of representative concepts and use english. You arent progressing in life by speaking languages people dont wanna deal with.

Edit post

#17 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@melcharaz

He claims he is easily fooled. That is why he hides behind numbers mixed with alphabets.

Edit post

#18 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Debby, @melcharaz

Do you understand everything?


No, nor me.


Does my friend Ebuc?


Nope.


Though I'm guessing that the answer is neither 42, or written in English.


And 42 like GOD, was a work of fiction generated by a human being.


Thereafter it was repeated to a point of conscious acceptability.



Edit post

#19 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch

It took Einstein a while to shrink his theory of relativity formular to E=mc2.

Edit post

#20 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Debby

Does E=mc2 = 42?

Edit post

#21 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch


That is incorrect because it mixes a physical law with an arbitrary number and uses incorrect values.


















Edit post

#22 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Debby

Exactly my point.

Edit post

#23 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch

Your point was, โ€œE=mc2 = 42?โ€

Edit post

#24 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Debby

Nope.


My question was, does E=mc2 = 42?


You put me straight,


And I was satisfied.

Edit post

#25 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch

So you want to know if your guess was right. does E=mc2 = 42?

Edit post

#26 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Debby

Nope, I'm happy for you to put me straight and satisfy me.

Edit post

#27 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch

So you are here looking for help?

Edit post

#28 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@Debby

One's search for satisfaction might or might not be better accomplished if one is assisted.


It would depend upon the specific requirement.

Edit post

#29 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข

Eventually you gotta summarize what you figured out so others can understand it.


Language is best conveyed when put simply.


Then others can build on what you said, or tear it down.


That is my problem with ebuc, its not a matter if he is right or wrong.


He doesnt word it where non mathmatical (algebraic, geometrical, calculus, otherwise) or non representative language can evaluate it.

Edit post

#30 โ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
@SergeantLynch

Your requirements are specific. You want to be put straight , that would satisfy you because you are crooked today.

Edit post