Lehamanville Tripartite

Started by ebuc

Replies
7
Posts
8
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••

In late 90's early 2000's believed Gravity to be directly associated with the 5-fold icosa{20}hedron.


Via Bucky Fullers Synergetics we knew of know mathmatical way to commensurate the irrational 5-fold values, -- 1-around-zero{ none } sphere--,


with that of the rational 4-fold values of the Vector Equilibrium aka cubo-octahedron { 12-around-1 equal radius spheres }. My view was that, if could mathematically commensurate them, get closer to understanding Gravity.


Jim Lehman via a Pentagonal Vector Matrix, was able to create an all-space filling set of three kinds of polyhedra. there by mathematically with geometry, commensurate the 5-fold and 4-fold polyhedra.


1} regular icosahedron, in following graphic it is the orange polyhedron

2} six irregular 4-ofld octahedra, -- it is the pink polyhedraon-- and,

3} eight 4-fold polyhedra -- we called the Polycabin -- that is skew abberation of one of Archmedes 13 polyhedra, the rhombic cubo-octahedron. --it made clear with transparency show the tetrahedron inside of one of five of them.


Here is the Lehmanville graphic that only shows some of the actual arrangement that would fill all-space. It was only last few days I began to figure out more the minimal number of needed polyhedra to create this all-space filling set. Along with more specifics that I will post later on.


First here is the original roguh draft Lehmanville graphic Jim made.


For following me along with the numerical counting values, the viewer at some point, remove the orange icosaheron from considerraton and will need to see there is another beige icosahedron in this graphic and its as the central nuclear location between the four lower Popycabins where they and two of the pink irregular octahedron tangentally conjoin with 10 faces/openings of the central beige icosahedron.

More coming to better visualize the set of polyhedra, needed to be and all-space filling set.


Edit comment

#2 •••
@ebuc
We knew of know mathmatical way to commensurate the irrational 5-fold values, -- 1-around-zero {none] sphere--,


Hmmmmmm.


I always try and run with you Ebuc...But this one has certainly tripped me up..."Knew of know" put me off balance to start with.

Edit post

#3 •••
@SergeantLynch

I wonder if that was a typo or a complex abstract twister.

Edit post

#4 •••
@Debby

"To commensurate the irrational 5-fold values", is certainly cryptic.


"1-around-zero {none} sphere--"...Even more so.


I do not Knew of know, if Ebuc is a genius or not.


But I will put the missing E in mathmatical down to a typo.

Edit post

#5 •••
@SergeantLynch

Correctrions..thank you Sarge----


...' Via Bucky Fullers Synergetics we knew of no mathmatical way to commensurate the irrational 5-fold values, --12-around-zero{ none } equal radius spheres-- with the rational 4-fold cubo-octahedron, octahedron etc.


Sorry Sarge, not enough proof reading on my part.


Edit post

#6 •••

Part 2: Overall considerations of the set of 48 cojoined openings/faces used to fill all-space i.e. rationally.


3-ness = structural integrity { 12 rectangles.. 4 X, 4 Y, 4 Z }..of the L-Polycabin 

...3p * 4 = 12..


4-ness = systemic integrity { 16 trapezoids } of the six pink irregular octahedra

...2p * 8 = 16....4 * 4 = 16...


5-ness = root core of stable integrity { 20 regular triangles } of the beige regular icosahedron

......2p * 10 = 20....4 * 5 = 20....{ calcium = 20..protons...20 neutrons...20 electrons }..



In these regards and keeping in mind, that, Bucky associated the 6 great circles { shunted } as an electron. At least that was one of his views of the electron in Synergetics. He may also have had others.


3p >< 2p >< 2p >< critical primes in the above set of considerations


Cojoined { bonded/valenced } openings total 48 needed to fill commensurate filling of allspace, around and includes the root core icosahedron. six irregular octahedra, and 8 L-Polycabins.


48 is more of 4-fold number than 5-fold?


24 { chords } + 24 { radii } = 48 as equanimity via the Vector Equlibrium/cubo-octahedron –as constructed from four circles of { paper bow-tie folded see grapihc B in link https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s04/figs/f5511.html } --


...and above, Jim Lehman presented a Polyhedral all-space { ergo rational } filling that mathematically, rationally commensurates via a numerical 48 cojoined openings, via the root core 5-fold icosa{20}hedron with 4-fold irregular octa and,


 the Polycabin { L-Poly } as a skewed atypical { has trapazoid and rectangle stand-ins for squares? } version of Archimedes, rhombic cubo-octahedron?...?....?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombicuboctahedron


Edit post

#7 •••
@SergeantLynch

26 faces/openings of the RH-cubo-octa is numerically same as Jims L-Poly-cabin yet so diffferrrent. I called it Poly Cabin. Jim lists it as L-poly. { Lehman Poly }.


Various ways Ive approached the above listed info. I believe anyone of the three kinds of polyhedral could be considered a root core i.e. we can surround any one of the three presented polyhedra, with enough of the other polyhedra, so the one we choose is the root core nucleus of all space filling matrice of polyhedra.


Why would I choose the 5-fold icosa{20}hedron as the root core? The 5-fold icosa{20}hedron contains has 31, conceptually spun great circles, 10 of those specifically define the 4-fold cubo-octahedron.

https://www.rwgrayprojects.com/Lynn/LynnS54.html


The 4-fold cubo-octahedron as buckys transforming jitterbug, does pass through a semi-icosahedral phase, tho that is not nearly as complete or wholistic{?} as the link above shows.




Edit post

#8 •••
@SergeantLynch

So you confirmed it was a typo. Have you tried correcting it or the rest is garbage too?

Edit post