Here is a really cool ai breakdown of levels of belief in the book the grammar of assent. Thoughts?

Started by linate

Replies
27
Posts
28
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 β€’β€’β€’

In An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent (1870), Saint John Henry Newman explores how the human mind moves from considering ideas to genuinely believing them. Rather than viewing belief as a gradient of logical probabilities, Newman argues that assent is unconditionalβ€”we either accept a proposition as true or we do not.

Newman breaks down the modes, levels, and processes of belief through key distinctions in Apprehension, Assent, and Inference.

1. Apprehension: The Basis of Assent

Before the mind can assent to a statement, it must first grasp its meaning. Newman calls this Apprehension. Depending on whether the mind apprehends an abstract concept or a concrete reality, assent takes one of two primary forms: Notional Assent or Real Assent.

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ THE HUMAN MIND β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
β”‚
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β–Ό β–Ό
NOTIONAL ASSENT REAL ASSENT
(Abstract / Intellectual) (Concrete / Experiential)
β”‚ β”‚
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
β–Ό β–Ό β–Ό β–Ό
Credence Opinion Speculation... IMAGINATIVE CONVICTION
β”‚
β–Ό
ILLATIVE SENSE
β”‚
β–Ό
CERTITUDE

2. The Two Primary Kinds of Assent

A. Notional Assent (Theoretical & Abstract Belief)

Notional assent occurs when the mind accepts propositions about abstract ideas, generalities, or logical definitions. It engages the theological or analytical intellect rather than the imagination.

Newman categorizes Notional Assent into five distinct levels/modes:

  1. Profession: Acquiescence to statements as a matter of custom, manners, or social convention without deep individual reflection (e.g., agreeing with a political platitude).
  2. Credence: Accepting general facts or common knowledge built on everyday information, history, or literature without personal experience (e.g., believing that Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon).
  3. Opinion: Assenting to a statement as the most likely or probable among competing theories, while acknowledging that it could be open to revision (e.g., holding a favorite economic theory).
  4. Presumption: Accepting fundamental principles or background assumptions that cannot be strictly proven but are taken for granted (e.g., trust in the reliability of memory or the uniformity of physical laws).
  5. Speculation: Deep mental reflection on abstract theoretical frameworks, mathematics, theology, or philosophy (e.g., assenting to a complex mathematical theorem or theological dogma as logically consistent).

B. Real Assent (Concrete & Experiential Belief)

Real assent occurs when a proposition is directed toward concrete things, personal experiences, or individual realities. It moves beyond mere theoretical agreement to engage the imagination, emotions, and memory, directly influencing personal conduct and devotion.

  1. Example: Notional assent is knowing theoretically that suffering exists; Real assent occurs when you witness or experience tragedy yourself, transforming abstract knowledge into a felt reality.
  2. Religious context: Notional assent accepts a theological dogma as an abstract definition; Real assent encounters God as a living personal reality.

3. Inference vs. Assent

Newman distinguishes Assent (unconditional acceptance of a truth) from Inference (conditional acceptance based on arguments or premises):

  1. Formal Inference: Deductive, explicit logic (syllogisms or mathematical proofs). Newman notes that while useful, paper logic alone rarely drives real-life belief or human action.
  2. Informal Inference: The mind's cumulative assessment of converging probabilitiesβ€”a multitude of independent, subtle indicators that together build an overwhelming case.
  3. Natural Inference: An instantaneous, implicit leap from concrete perceptions directly to conclusions based on lived experience (e.g., smelling smoke and immediately inferring fire without constructing a formal logical proof).

4. Certitude and the "Illative Sense"

How do humans bridge the gap between accumulated probabilities (Inference) and absolute conviction (Assent)? Newman identifies two key concepts:

  1. The Illative Sense: The personal, organic faculty of the human mind that evaluates informal evidence, context, intuition, and memory as a cohesive whole. It allows the mind to judge when converging probabilities are sufficient to make an unconditional leap of faith.
  2. Certitude: The highest level of Real Assentβ€”an indefectible, unshakeable conviction that has survived conscious reflection and testing, yielding permanent personal peace and truth.

Edit comment

#2 β€’β€’β€’
@linate
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#3 β€’β€’β€’
@linate

There are very few beliefs, if any, that I would accept unconditionally.

Edit post

Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. - Christopher Hitchens

#4 β€’β€’β€’

Philosophers and scientists argue that rational or justified beliefs require empirical evidence or logical support to be deemed valid.

Edit post

#5 β€’β€’β€’

Belief is a futile attempt at justifying ignorance.


One either knows something or one doesn't.

Edit post

#6 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

Or one believes out of faith and hope of things promised as in the Bible.

Edit post

#7 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Even more futility.

Edit post

#8 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

You must have picked the wrong religion to feel your life is ending in futility.

Edit post

#9 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

That's the thing, I didn't pick a religion, therefore my life has been free from religious futility.


And my life just like yours, will end when our self propelled and self sustaining computing systems eventually wear out, switch off and eventually self destruct.


Actually it will either be cremation or decomposition by micro organisms that eventually destroys our defunct bodies.

Edit post

#10 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

The choice was your and you chose to end this way. Sad.

Edit post

#11 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Well, baring cryogenics there is currently no real choice...But for sure, many are prepared to invest in religious misinformation and false promises...Which is why RC Inc. became a multi-billion dollar business empire.

Edit post

#12 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

It is important not only how you come to accept your beliefs but also what you believe in. Jesus said John 6:29 to believe in the one he has sent.

Edit post

#13 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Yes, I mentioned the John mystery elsewhere.

Edit post

#14 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

You are sitting on the answers to your problems.

Edit post

#15 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Everything is currently hunky-dory.


Though I'm always up for a bit of therapy.

Edit post

#16 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

You can start with the size of your ego.

Edit post

#17 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

My ego is satisfactory.

Edit post

#18 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

Then why do you need therapy for your ego?

Edit post

#19 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

I don't, but it wouldn't hurt to have ones ego managed by a competent therapist just in case it gets out of hand.


You know what they say Debs...One in the hand is worth two in the bush.

Edit post

#20 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

They are also cheaper by the dozen.

Edit post

#21 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Hmmmm...Don't get over confident Debs.

Edit post

#22 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

I cannot inflate my ego like you do.

Edit post

#23 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Have you been trying?


Maybe you have a puncture.

Edit post

#24 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

My therapist automatically kicks in.

Edit post

#25 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

Ah so you have a therapist too, and they automatically arouse your ego should it become deflated.

Edit post

#26 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

My training as a therapist automatically kicks in to maintain the balance.

Edit post

#27 β€’β€’β€’
@Debby

As you can probably tell, I am also well trained.

Edit post

#28 β€’β€’β€’
@SergeantLynch

Your ego is already tiny. You also trained it not to inflate. So remaining small is how you deal with it.

Edit post