Let's Analyze Abortion from the lens of a Fetus | Forum

Most debates revolving around Abortion are female centric.

People would give several reasons for an abortion:-

1. Rape

2. Incest(power imbalance within a family type stuff

3. Many others, the list doesn't have an end

The Debate is always viewed as the rights of a woman vs the rights of a fetus.

Pro Choice people make great points about woman rights, and that the Fetus doesn't have a life, or a will. They usually establish a logical conclusion which is women's rights matter more than a lifeless emryo or fetus.

But aren't pro-choice people missing a major point? And, aren't Pro-Life people a walking contradiction ?

They act as if they are the most moral people on Earth, they are some saints or something, when they talk all high about the rights of a fetus, like

1. Women have killed more babies in abortions than men did in wars 😢(completely wrong obviously)

2. Using AI to make the, Fetus POV

"Aah, it Pains 😢, but it will make Mom's life better. Bye Mum 😢(obvious nonsense)

But there Human Empathy goes to a gutter as soon as we come to the bigger question

WHAT AFTER THE BABY IS ALLOWED TO BE BORN

1. The Child of a Rapist

Answer, he is fatherless, his mother is mentally sick as she got SAed and then had to carry the baby of convict. He didn't realize this earlier, but in the age of about 8 to 12 years, he realizes how he was born. Think about it. In most cases it would be a financially weak child, as he doesn't have a father.

2. Downsyndrome

I don't think I need something to write here, to convince you

3. Financially, Emotionally, Mentally not prepared Mother or parents

Probably, try going to a slum. You will see splendid scenes there. It's the biggest reason for abortions. Just imagine, how many people will be living without electricity and food if abortion wasn't an option.

Pro-Lifers, which is a contradiction to what they say. Those people try everything to paint pro-choicers as devils or baby killers. I completely find that nonsensical, pro-lifers are the most evil beings I have ever seen because They want babies to be born in scenarios where they would feel suffering.

One branch of the debate is

1. Killing the child of a rapist is like killing the child of a theif

Ans, no it is not. In the theif's case the mother consented, the father is present and no trauma involved.

2. Pro-Choicers want all poor people dead

Ans, no we don't. Have you watched Attack on Titan, I am following Zeke ideology, not Marley ideology.

Marley wanted all eldians to die, Zeke wanted that they simply stop reproducing, a pacifist idea.

I don't want 10 poor people to die, I simply don't want them to bring 30 more people into suffering. This argument has been the most stupid one, we pro choice just don't want unnecessary suffering, and pro lifers just want everyone to be just born. They use false Equivalence to equate a lump of cells with a human baby

Edit comment

Mentions Text*

Most debates revolving around Abortion are female centric.People would give several reasons for an abortion:-1. Rape2. Incest(power imbalance within a family type stuff3. Many others, the list doesn't have an end The Debate is always viewed as the rights of a woman vs the rights of a fetus. Pro Choice people make great points about woman rights, and that the Fetus doesn't have a life, or a will. They usually establish a logical conclusion which is women's rights matter more than a lifeless emryo or fetus. But aren't pro-choice people missing a major point? And, aren't Pro-Life people a walking contradiction ?They act as if they are the most moral people on Earth, they are some saints or something, when they talk all high about the rights of a fetus, like1. Women have killed more babies in abortions than men did in wars 😢(completely wrong obviously)2. Using AI to make the, Fetus POV"Aah, it Pains 😢, but it will make Mom's life better. Bye Mum 😢(obvious nonsense) But there Human Empathy goes to a gutter as soon as we come to the bigger question WHAT AFTER THE BABY IS ALLOWED TO BE BORN 1. The Child of a Rapist Answer, he is fatherless, his mother is mentally sick as she got SAed and then had to carry the baby of convict. He didn't realize this earlier, but in the age of about 8 to 12 years, he realizes how he was born. Think about it. In most cases it would be a financially weak child, as he doesn't have a father. 2. DownsyndromeI don't think I need something to write here, to convince you3. Financially, Emotionally, Mentally not prepared Mother or parents Probably, try going to a slum. You will see splendid scenes there. It's the biggest reason for abortions. Just imagine, how many people will be living without electricity and food if abortion wasn't an option. Pro-Lifers, which is a contradiction to what they say. Those people try everything to paint pro-choicers as devils or baby killers. I completely find that nonsensical, pro-lifers are the most evil beings I have ever seen because They want babies to be born in scenarios where they would feel suffering. One branch of the debate is1. Killing the child of a rapist is like killing the child of a theifAns, no it is not. In the theif's case the mother consented, the father is present and no trauma involved.2. Pro-Choicers want all poor people deadAns, no we don't. Have you watched Attack on Titan, I am following Zeke ideology, not Marley ideology.Marley wanted all eldians to die, Zeke wanted that they simply stop reproducing, a pacifist idea.I don't want 10 poor people to die, I simply don't want them to bring 30 more people into suffering. This argument has been the most stupid one, we pro choice just don't want unnecessary suffering, and pro lifers just want everyone to be just born. They use false Equivalence to equate a lump of cells with a human baby

Conversation

Edit comment