Completeness theorem, and why senses are incomplete, thus observation evidence is invalid! (Why God is as real as observation evidence)

Started by SatanLucy

Replies
88
Posts
89
Page
2 / 3

Conversation

#31 •••
@SomeDebatePerson

They will still be punished for sinning even if they refuse to believe in God.

Edit post

#32 •••
@SatanLucy

Congratulations, you've committed yourself to Descarteian solipsism. Unless you doubt your mind's existence, however, that's a contradiction.


The completeness theorems don't talk about axioms. It's about the logical consequences of using a set of axioms.


When we argue about the existence of external reality, we're arguing about the validity of self evident (axiomatic) claims.

However, solipsism is pretty silly to everyone.



Edit post

#33 •••
@Golan

I would appreciate a counter-argument.

Edit post

#34 •••
@SomeDebatePerson

Or, all the things that the piously repressed condemn.



And I am a firm advocate of the idea that everything that occurs within a Universe is natural...What else can it be.


Even in another Universe...Such would be the nature of multiverses...And therein might evolve an intelligent organic blob with a quizzical nature.


And at some point in its development, said blob would inevitably look for answers and conclude that it was all the work of a fantasy version of itself.

Edit post

#35 •••
@SergeantLynch

Your blob discovers it is a quizzical by nature.

Edit post

#36 •••
@Debby

I wouldn't attempt to seek domination over a blob from another Universe.


Though what with quantum entanglement and all that, you never know.

Edit post

#37 •••
@SergeantLynch

The term "blob" in the context of quantum entanglement can refer to 

Bose-Einstein condensate, which is a "blob" of cold atoms behaving as a single quantum unit, or to a mathematical concept called a "quantum blob" used in phase space quantization. The "quantum blob" is a way to visualize a quantum state in phase space that respects the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and this mathematical concept could be applied to describe the entangled state of particles. 

Edit post

#38 •••
@Debby

There you go.


Blobs is as blobs do.


And some might be very good at it.

Edit post

#39 •••
@SergeantLynch

The word "blob" can be used in a slang or informal context to mean a 

dull, slow-witted, and uninteresting person, which is similar to the meaning of "dumb" or "stupid". 

Edit post

#40 •••
@Debby

Or a tacky droplet.

Edit post

#41 •••
@SergeantLynch

Compare their differences.

The word "blob" can be used in a slang or informal context to mean a 

dull, slow-witted, and uninteresting person, which is similar to the meaning of "dumb" or "stupid". 



A "tacky droplet" 

most commonly refers to honeydew, a sticky, sugary excretion from sap-sucking insects like aphids, mealybugs, or scale. This substance can be found on plants, cars, and other surfaces, and it can lead to the growth of black sooty mold. Another possibility is plant sap, which is secreted naturally by some plants, like philodendrons. 


Edit post

#42 •••
@Debby

Yes, there are also other means of tacky droplet secretion.

Edit post

#43 •••
@SergeantLynch

You might want to keep your condition private.

Edit post

#44 •••
@Debby

I will discuss it with my therapist.


Do you know of any good therapists, that specialise in tacky droplet issues.

Edit post

#45 •••
@SergeantLynch

While 

there is a significant number of therapists in Britain, the general consensus is that there is a shortage of publicly funded therapists relative to the high and growing demand for mental health services. Access varies considerably between private and public options. 

Edit post

#46 •••
@Debby

Yes, mental health issues are a growing socio-psychological trend, relative to expectation, relative to data availability and associated technology.


Was Planet Earth ever a safe place for carbon based lifeforms?


What were they thinking...Sort of, sacrificial lambs to the evolutionary slaughter and the necessity of intellect.

Edit post

#47 •••
@SergeantLynch

There is no consensus on how many lives the Earth can support, as estimates vary widely depending on factors like technology, resource consumption, and sustainability

. While many studies suggest the planet's human carrying capacity is around 8 billion or slightly more, some estimates range from under 1 billion to over a trillion. The number depends heavily on lifestyle choices and resource management. 

Edit post

#48 •••
@Debby

For sure.


And depending upon the meaning of life, such issues are either consequential or inconsequential.

Edit post

#49 •••
@SergeantLynch

The number depends heavily on lifestyle choices and resource management. 

Edit post

#50 •••
@Debby

And apocalyptic events perhaps.


Or catastrophic ones.

Edit post

#51 •••
@SergeantLynch

Those are acts of God.

Edit post

#52 •••
@Debby

For insurance purposes only.

Edit post

#53 •••
@Debby
While many studies suggest the planet's human carrying capacity is around 8 billion or slightly more,


Oh crap, there's already 8.2 billion...we're screwed.



Edit post

#54 •••
@Sidewalker

There are 8.2 billion of us because we are screwing.

Edit post

#55 •••
@Debby


Wink, wink

Edit post

#56 •••
@FLRW

Is that how you communicate non verbally?

Edit post

#57 •••
@Debby

Wink, wink


Edit post

#58 •••
@FLRW

She is already taken.

Edit post

#59 •••
@Debby
She is already taken.


And rewarded appropriately.



One dick looks and tastes very similar to another.


Whereas some wallets will be much more rewarding.

Edit post

#60 •••
@SergeantLynch
One dick looks and tastes very similar to another.


How would you know how his dick tastes? Did you taste enough dicks to be able to compare?

Edit post