Voting restrictions

Started by RemyBrown

Replies
25
Posts
26
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••
⚠️ This post has been marked as offensive.

Edit comment

#2 •••
@RemyBrown

Might make sense to have some kind of exam as long as it doesn't get corrupted. I've thought for a while that we should have a system modeled after juries, where some citizens watch different factions debate/cross-examine each other on the most significant issues and then those citizens give an "informed" vote where their thousand votes counts for like 20% of the makeup of congress. Then other citizens can delegate their vote to the jury and it gets split up along the same lines as the jury voted. So overall they could end up representing like 40-60% of the vote.

Edit post

#3 •••
@Savant
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#4 •••
@Savant
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#5 •••
@RemyBrown
My boring title will probably attract small amounts of conversation compared to my clickbait titles.

Maybe, but I think the conversation will be a more productive one. And people who would be sucked into rage bait may spend their time elsewhere doing something productive instead.

Edit post

#6 •••
@RemyBrown
I'd make the exam required to vote, but passing the exam isn't required as not passing the exam just means you can't vote; you won't get put in prison. This means people who genuinely are apolitical don't take the exam and they don't vote once every 1160 days. They can watch TV for all I care.

As I said, my only concern is corruption. Someone will need to decide on the questions, and literacy tests have been abused in the past.

Edit post

#7 •••
@Savant
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#8 •••
@RemyBrown
The same immigration questions that every immigrant has to take to become a US citizen with votting rights.

The immigration process isn't famous for being efficient and non corrupt.

Edit post

#9 •••
@Savant
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#10 •••
@RemyBrown

Well, hopefully. The danger is it incentivizes the party in power to make it biased or ask questions their side is more likely to know the answers to.

Edit post

#11 •••
@Savant
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#12 •••
@RemyBrown

I read somewhere Melania was not an American citizen when she had Barron. That makes both not qualify for birthright citizenship.

Edit post

#13 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#14 •••
@RemyBrown

She can name her favourite president and best city to live in.

Edit post

#15 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#16 •••
@RemyBrown

The courts have rules Trump’s voting ban illegal. They believe domestic problems like his should be settled at home.

Edit post

#17 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#18 •••
@RemyBrown

That is upto Melania to give him what he wants.

Edit post

#19 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#20 •••
@RemyBrown

Trump is seen in the Epstein files with other minor girls. He is a married man with three wives. Is he looking for a fourth so he can convert to Islam because his Bible sales are down?

Edit post

#21 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#22 •••
@RemyBrown

You only like his united Reich?

Edit post

#23 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#24 •••
@RemyBrown

A Nazi nation is a united Reich.

Edit post

#25 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#26 •••
@RemyBrown

Nazi cause 25 million deaths.

Edit post