Apparently, somebody wants to get me banned.
Out of his evidence, the prosecutor presents:
- 14 threads I made with 8 likes between them. I'm so unpopular that I have over 50% likes for every OP. None are self likes.
- 0 instances of either N word variation.
- A link to my profile that shows that I'm moderate (and the prosecution argues that I'm extreme)
- A bunch of threads where I reference women, but 0 instances of me referring to women as, "c*nts", "wh*res", "304s", or any other word that objectifies them sexually.
- A bunch of threads with LGBT, 0 instances of the word, "f*ggot"
- A single accusation of someone being a pedo (and they admit to it in post 21) (Relevant thread).
- 0 calls for violence. 0 endorsements of Hitler.
- To the best of my knowledge, I never advocated for making the Age of Consent 0.
- One of my posts that you use as evidence has, "What if" as a Rage Bait title according to the prosecution.
Where the prosecution and I have some common ground is I'm identitarian to a large extent (as we all are). I'll make my case without mentioning Women, Blacks, Jews, or any group like that.
In the US, it is illegal to drink alcohol if you're under 21. That's ageism; that's identitarian. The law discriminates against those who have being under 21 as part of their identity. Everyone agrees. I'm identitarian; so is everybody. Some are more identitarian than others. Race is largely based on geogorphy. The same is true for types of states (blue state, battleground state, red state). If you say, "Winning CA as a democrat is easy; winning TX as a democrat is hard", then that's an identitarian statement; the state is the identity. There was a time when I rejected identitarian mentality, then I watched these videos and it changed things:
These are very frequently viewed videos. I didn't agree with everything in the videos, but the parts I disagreed with I just ignored and continued to watch. Virtually zero comments were mocking the creator or any of the people involved with the video. And although I'm own my bias, I don't think this trial should have ever existed and I'm surprised it ever occurred to begin with.
I mean this in a genuine way, if my opinions are banworthy, then I fail to see how one can be genuinely socially conservative and be permitted to be on this site.
DebateCraft says I'm pretty moderately on the right. Creative; original; but moderate nonetheless.