There is a constant argument in America that indigenous tribes should have retained land authority over the colonists' claims of sovereignty. This issue is not unique to America. All over the world, this conflict has plagued humanity. Civilization has meant conflict in land domination, even when the world population was much smaller than today, when land was abundant all over the world, [frankly, it still is, but that's another subject] and until sovereignty organized nation-states.
Both Western and Eastern civilizations from antiquity [Greece in the West; China in the East] up to and perhaps even earlier than 5,000 years ago when written language, the root of civilization, began, primarily with Sumarian Cuneiform and Old Kingdom Egyptian hieroglyphs. Language allowed the creation of society, and society quickly learned that rule of law needed to be developed, including what constituted nation-states from random collections of populations. Rule of law created sovereignty.
This is why the indigenous peoples [tribes] failed to establish sovereignty, because they did not develop organized, written rule of law, and the colonists did. Until the 1960's, they continued to refer to themselves by their tribal names, and not as cohesive, unified "Native Americans."