A bunch of capitas decided here that abortion wouldn't be a topic of Rage Bait. Here we go:
Abortion should be banned even when the woman gets raped because a zygote's life matters more than a rape victim's pregnancy pain and being raped doesn't give you the excuse to murder someone else.
If someone has the view of, "legal only if raped", then the woman has to prove she got raped in order to get the abortion (which basically means illegal even for rape victims as proving rape is almost impossible).
My take (albeit it is rare at 10%), may make me a bad person in the eyes of the left. Good. I welcome their hatred once I've seen what they defend (Lindsay Clancy).
1 of 3 things are true:
- Me having views in the 10% is not Rage Bait to the left.
- Me having views in the 10% is Rage Bait to the left, but someone with views in the 27% would not be Rage Bait. Then you need an arbitrary cutoff point for how rare a political opinion has to be on the political spectrum for it to be Rage Bait.
- Anyone in the 37% is expressing Rage Bait. The 19% wouldn't be Rage Bait (legal in all cases) because only right wing opinions can be Rage Bait.
![]()
