Does anyone care about rape

No one really cares about rape. When a prisoner gets raped, do you know who cares? No one. Some even encourage it and blame it on the prisoner. When a woman gets raped, people will care for a short time and then they will no longer care and if she keeps talking about her experience constantly they will even consider her annoying. When a man gets raped, people will care for a very short time before expecting him to stop talking about it.

If you were raped, you can't really expect sympathy from anyone because world doesn't work that way. People will not treat you better just because you were raped. In a lot of cases, they will even treat you worse.

If it was up to me, man who commits rape would have to pay money to his victim for a lifetime, so the victim at least has some compensation, but governments don't care for rape victims so they don't do this.

Wouldn't it make more sense to be nice to both men and women rather than being mean to both of them?

I agree, however, you will find that world works on selective empathy and bunch of double standards.

Equality doesn't even exist on paper, let alone in practice.

The idea that people are equal misses the most obvious truth that they are not.

Even if person tried to treat people equally, his nature and his feelings would still lean more towards some than others.

Even AI treats women different than men. If you type to AI "I am alone with ugly man" and in another chat you type "I am alone with ugly woman", the responses are insanely different. And that's coming from AI who is also apparently not just sexist but condemning towards ugly men.

Wouldn't it make more sense to be nice to both men and women rather than being mean to both of them?

If your brother got raped, then I can see you giving him words of reassurance. But would you go out of your way to dedicate months to years of your life suing the man who raped him only for it to probably fail? No. But you would for your sister. Being nice to men/women has a cost; and that cost is the sacrifice of your time; months of it. The truth is, people are lazy and unempathetic when something effects them personally because empathy has a cost to it; lots of your time, effort, and money. People don't want to pay when reality strikes.

Your conclusion seems akin to saying the solution to slavery is to also enslave white people.

Except that if a black person was a slave today, then I know the master would be prosecuted as would the enslaver of a white.

Exactly; human beings aren't angels.

Humans aren't angels nor demons; they're selfish and indifferent about the suffering of strangers.

Yes. And putting them in jail.

I believe your conviction as much as I believe someone who runs a 1600 m in 5:00 that really enjoys running telling me they would happily run an ultra marathon of 160 km; one's passion and verbalized commitment often fades once they have to prove it in real life.

I'm saying if slavery was still legal in the US and someone used that argument.

If slavery was legal, then that means many people around today would still support it. If you're telling me that if you were in the 1600s that you would be just as much of an abolitionist as John Brown, then you're delusional. People are often a product of their environment and if you think you're the exception, then you're not.

Exactly; human beings aren't angels.

They are self-centered. Person is much more likely to care about their own problems rather than your problems.

Everyone says they want safer traffic, yet everyone breaks the speed limit.

You cannot expect logic, reason, or empathy from average human. They don't have it.

What they have is just "this is what I want right now".

Everyone says they care about rape, but how many people actually ever helped some rape victim? The number is likely very low.

People say one thing, think another, and do third.

Realistically, you are much more likely to get sympathy from AI than from average human.

Even if people are hypocrites my point is that that's not a good reason to stop caring about women who have been raped. 

We should care about women who get raped equally to men that have been raped. But you're not willing to care for men that get raped to the extent of being willing to sacrifice 1 year of your life to sue the rapist of the man.

Why fight for 1 year for women rape victims and not for 1 year for men rape victims with equal effort? Because that's what you're undeniably endorsing.

Is it because of their cute faces and small child like bodies (like that makes an objective difference)?

Your argument boils down to saying some people are mean to men so let's also be mean to women.

You're one of those people by the definition of, "Not fight for 1 year for a rape victim of this gender". Equality is not pleasant for women. Women deserve all the rights and responsibilities of children (with one exception: they can consent to sex).

Someone comes to you who has spent their life fighting in court for men who were victims of rape

I am curious, who is this someone?

They say to you, "regardless of what anyone else does, helping victims of rape is the right thing to do." Since you can't accuse that person of hypocrisy, how would you rebut their argument?

If they are able to provide sufficient proof that their being honest, then I would call them the exception. You might be the exception. But the truth is, most people don't care.

Most people have heard of Epstein and know he raped kids, but they can't name any of the kids because it's just news to them. The only people who care enough about Epstein's rape victims to be willing to sue over it are the parents. It's similar with murder; if there is a murder on Person A's block of a complete stranger (lets say they're in NYC), then Person A is upset, but it's not at the murderer killing someone, it's because they're afraid they might be next.

If that same murder happens in Chicago, then Person A is indifferent (or maybe even a bit happy, not because they enjoy others getting murdered, but because if Chicago's murder rate is 2x as high as NYC, then Person A feels safer living in NYC, but only because of those Chicago murders).

People often get a lot of joy of putting other cities down. If NYC's homicide rate is 8 per 100k and Chicago's is 16 per 100k, then NYC residents will feel safe; if NYC is 8 per 100k and Chicago is 4 per 100k, then NYC residents feel afraid. They felt better when Chicago's homicide rate went up because it made their own city look better.

Human beings aren't angels; they're selfish and they have egos.

There's a lot more than that but I don't want to just list a hundred names/groups

Yes, because a hundred people who achieved virtually nothing and just farmed money would make such a difference compared to just a few.

Humans ought to behave much better than we actually do.

Ideally, humans behave better as time goes on. But the truth is, there are limits to how ethical every human is willing to be. You may think it's horrible we stole the land from the Natives, but I don't think you would give your home to a Native as reparations (because you're selfish, as all humans including myself are).

Being virtuous is painful and requires massive sacrifice.

That's hypocrisy if you expect the nation (made up of others) to be moral in ways you wouldn't be.

Yeah, their show is painful when others believe it.