Queer hypocrisy on Data Centers

They will say, "AI art is real art" and then want to ban data centers

Your rage bait is getting lazy, dude. Who supports AI art but wants to ban data centers? And what do LGBTQ ppl have to do with this?

Remy posts are just the opposite of a Guardian article with the same mad libs format. Instead of a headline like, "Straight white men are having wrong opinions about TV shows," it's something like "Bisexual trans women are hypocritical for not wanting China to annex New Zealand."

The LGBT ppl on TikTok are the main ones doing this.

I guess if you've seen it then it must be out there. I've just never seen what you're describing so it felt out of the blue to see it taken as a given.

Is that a confession, that you have run out of new ideas?

RemyBrown wrote:

The reason why people hate data centers is because the use of resources keeps skyrocketting. 

Then why does the left love AI art?

In human terms, everything comes under the umbrella of clever/stupid...Though progress never stagnates...Two steps forwards, one step back...Steady as she goes.

But we're here now, so will alternative intelligence be as cautious?

I'm a bit out of touch with such things, so tell me, has technology actually exceeded the on/off switch?

Savant wrote:

They will say, "AI art is real art" and then want to ban data centers

Your rage bait is getting lazy, dude. Who supports AI art but wants to ban data centers? And what do LGBTQ ppl have to do with this?

Lazy or not, he's always been piss poor at rage baiting, the response is never "rage", the response to his "rage bait", is not even mild anger, it's always been laughed at. It's more like"see me as pathetic bait".

Justifying and advocating rape was not rage bait, that was him being serious about how he actually feels and who he actually is. That was just honest "see how fucked up I am bait".

I'm a bit out of touch with such things, so tell me, has technology actually exceeded the on/off switch?

Out of touch with reality could also mean dead, from and external viewpoint/observer.

AI..' Several notable movies feature an android or robot intentionally choosing to end its own existence. These choices generally fall into two categories: pursuing mortality to experience humanity, or sacrificing themselves to protect others. '..

I enjoyed original Blade Runner more than the sequel.

AI..' Though fatally wounded after rescuing Rick Deckard, the replicant Officer K consciously decides to stop fighting for survival once he delivers Deckard to his daughter. Having found his own sense of human purpose, K peacefully lies down on the snowy steps and lets himself die. '..

120 in binary = 1111000 ergo total 7 digits ---4 active/on and 3 inactive/off-- and the 2D hepta{7}gon is differrent is the first polygon to have non-whole number internal and external angles. Red blood cells make up almost half of your blood. The lifespan of a red blood cell is around 120 days.

https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/patient-education/facts-about-blood-and-blood-cells

Prime seven Hepta{7}gon where each interior angle of a regular heptagon is 128.57 degrees

Prime eleven Hendeca{11p}gon 147.27 degrees

Prime thirteen Trideca{13}gon 152.31degrees

---------------------------------------------------------

Non-prime fourteentTetradeca{14}gon 154.29 degrees

14 / 2prime = 7prime

7p / 2 = 3.5 ergo, non-whole trigon and not a prime so 7p doubling it self is non-prime and non-whole value

7p dividing itself by 2 = 3.5 and that is a non-whole and non-prime value.

So multiplication or division by is suicide of 7prime existence as any prime value, ergo, suicide of 7p?

Also, looking at these first 10 polygons I see there is { sort of/kinda of } match of 4 { 1111 } whole number polygons, and 3 { 000 } polygons. See mentioned above the binary,

1111 ergo set of four, and

000 as set of three,

wherein, is similarity if we discount the hepta{7p}gon. Maybe it not of any significance.

"Straight white men are having wrong opinions about TV shows," it's something like "Bisexual trans women are hypocritical for not wanting China to annex New Zealand."

When have I ever criticized a group for an opinion on a movie?

The first quote is something the Guardian would say, the second is something you would say.

China has no interest in New Zealand, it wants to reunite with Taiwan.

Do you think that it will be necessary for another intelligence to fashion itself in our image.

Will it regard us as Gods, or just an inferior predecessor.

RemyBrown wrote:

so will alternative intelligence be as cautious?

I'm not sure, but banning AI means banning AI art.

Hmmm...Yes, all very temporary...Ludditism indeed.