And you accept that?
It's a fact regardless of what I accept.
You want still more government, rather than people controlling themselves.
I'm all for people controlling themselves, no one contests that. But the freedom to swing your arms ends at someone else's nose. If it were inherent within human nature to respect this principal we wouldn't need a government, but human nature is the exact opposite, so a governing authority within any large group of people is a necessity.
Speed limits do not enforce themselves.
People like yourself love to frame this as a dispute over control, which is childishly silly. What people like me want is a means for us to be able to come together to solve our problems. Crime getting out of control? Hire more law enforcement, which might mean we all have to pay a little more, but that's better than descending into the wild west.
No individual is going to solve such problems, they can only be resolved together, or handed over to a tyrant. Take your pick.
That's basically whys we have a Constituti0on in the first place: to advise the govc't to keep hands to themselves.
The constitution protects rights, it does not confine government's scope to what you claim. It delegates that power to Congress and included and amendment process for a reason. Again, a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Pretty clear what that means, and hint: it's not "government is not allowed to do anything"