3rd UFO hearing in the US Congress

Started by Misterio

Replies
13
Posts
14
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••
🔗 Link

I don't want to talk of how gorgeous Anna Paulina was in the Congress leading the UFO hearing, even though it was difficult to me to focus on the subject instead of her. I'd just like to ask the Americans how you're taking these new revelations that the US Congress is making about the UFO issue. This time the politicos in the Congress talked about very interesting sht.


They played a video where you can see an orb (a sort of alien drone) that was hit by a missile but didn't suffer any damage. One of the whistleblowers said that the government has been researching the material which these alien spacecrafts are made of, a sort of metal that seems indestructible, but so far they didn't figure out how to replicate it.


This reminds me of another psycographic of Parravicini, the Argentinian Nostradamus, where he says "Every astral spacecraft is built with materials not yet known on Earth. Their spacecrafts are lightweight, molded in one piece without any joints. The ship's owner is also encased in a seamless, full-body, spacesuit-like garment, and some are transparent and blue. Our fire, at its maximum intensity, will neither heat nor pierce their consistency."



I look forward to the 4th UFO hearing.

Edit comment

#2 •••
🔗 Link
@Misterio

A recent Pentagon study analyzed reported sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), commonly referred to as UFOs, over nearly a century. The study concluded that there is no evidence of aliens or extraterrestrial intelligence associated with these sightings. Most reported incidents were attributed to ordinary objects or misidentifications, reinforcing the idea that UFOs do not represent alien technology or life form.

Edit post

#3 •••
🔗 Link
@Misterio

Do u have a credible source for these claims?

Edit post

#4 •••
🔗 Link
@linate

What claim? About the spacecraft material? It's been discussed in the US hearing. It's also part of the testimony of several whistleblowers, former US officials who had access to the UFO retrieval and reverse engineering program. I think that was also discussed in Joe Rogan's podcast and many other podcasts that you can find in youtube.


Something also brought up in the session was the case of the Russian nuclear weapons deactivated by the aliens.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pM6c_RENfc

Edit post

#5 •••
🔗 Link
@Misterio

@Misterio

Generally I just assume there are explanations for various events, other than UFOs.


A family member tried getting me to read Imminent by Luis Elizondo, I just couldn't get very far into it. I found the claims of mind powers absurd.


I'm not really following any government talks on UFOs.


@NobodyInParticular on post #4 video

"George T. Knapp is an American journalist, news anchor and talk radio host. Much of his work has focused on the paranormal, particularly UFOs."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Knapp_(television_journalist)



Edit post

#6 •••
🔗 Link
@Misterio

If super intelligent extra terrestrials have the know how and the ability to get here, then they may well do.


In the mean time, certain Earth based theorists will continue to come up with all sorts of insubstantial evidence to suggest that they already have done.


Just like certain theorists never come up with actual proof of bigfoot.



Edit post

#7 •••
🔗 Link
@SergeantLynch

There is a video shown in the Congress. Did you watch it?

Edit post

#8 •••
🔗 Link

As I suggested, if super intelligent extra terrestrials have the where with all for interstellar travel, and intend to visit, they probably won't fuck about.


When you consider that the current extent of our space travel achievements is precariously whizzing around the Earth in an aging collection of tin cans, dodging space junk.


And I've probably said to you before, that it would be absolutely amazing if they did show up...But they haven't yet.

Edit post

#9 •••
🔗 Link
@Misterio

You're showing a lot of hearsay. I agree there r ufo things we can't explain and wouldn't argue if u called it evidence of aliens. But im not seeing anything close to slam dunk evidence. The credibility of witnesses is compelling. But if bombs are hitting ufo and it causes no damage let's see clear video evidence

Edit post

#10 •••
🔗 Link
@linate
The credibility of witnesses is compelling. But if bombs are hitting ufo and it causes no damage let's see clear video evidence


You mean like a 8K video? This is what they have, don't ask for more.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsCcEE-vrIk


But don't worry, alien contact is very close.

Edit post

#11 •••
🔗 Link
@SergeantLynch
And I've probably said to you before, that it would be absolutely amazing if they did show up...But they haven't yet.


They did show up to certain people. Either way, I think they left enough clues to notice they exist.

Edit post

#12 •••
🔗 Link
@Misterio

Just behaviour typical of certain humans.


Who create elaborate tales with omniscient or super intelligent central characters and then proceed to portray said characters as shrinking violets, who only show themselves to certain humans...Humans who conveniently are the ones that find tantalising bits of scrap metal and see flashing lights.


Nope, if they're going to travel light years across a vast Universe, then it's going to be an in your face, all singing, all dancing spacecraft. No fucking about.

Edit post

#13 •••
🔗 Link
@Misterio

it wasnt the best video quality, i could barely tell what i was seeing

Edit post

#14 •••
🔗 Link

Aliens aren’t real

Edit post