Less women voted for Trump. But they have to put up with the stupid men’s vote for Trump.

Tru-dat!

Day 547 of Remy not being able to let go of man vs bear

Maybe 1% of men selected the bear over the woman they didn’t know based on false rape accusations. Vice versa isn’t true for women.

Yes it is! Most women dont choose to go to a forest and live with a bear. Statistically, woman is more likely to date her rapist than live in a forest with bear.

Many women don’t deserve the right to vote

Pff half the population shouldn't be allowed to vote. You should have to take a civics test to earn the privilege of voting. The kind of test that only 20% of the people could pass without studying.

Make it 5%.

I dont want 120 IQ retards governing a nation.

half the population shouldn't be allowed to vote

Half the eligible voting population already doesn't vote. So the least informed half is already filtering themselves out. A civics test is an interesting idea, but all it takes is a little corruption among whoever grades or write the questions to use it to exclude their political opponents.

Day 547 of Remy not being able to let go of man vs bear

I was thinking the same thing, he has been obsessed with the man vs bear thing.

Do you suppose it is just him, or is it a big thing with other incels too?

It takes a massive systemic concession for me to have a chance of letting it go. I've let certain things go before (ex: Believe women, vaccine mandates) but the left had to massively concede. This time is different because of how much the left preaches about, "human rights" but then performs this stunt.

Letting go = conceding unless the other side conceded first.

The left should not win on the Man v Bear issue (otherwise it means no human rights for men). But men are fine with being viewed as worse than murderous bears if it means free sex and a hot woman to look at.

So basically you can't distinguish between human rights and dumb culture war back-and-forths because you're an oversensitive drama queen

Let the guy have his opinion. All this mocking you guys do is only proving his point to him.

I agree. We should repeal the 19th amendment. Women have used the arguement that they were treated less than men for over 1000 years, but the reality is, they are more emotional and are the weaker vessel, as God intended. He made eve to be a help meet for the man, not to contend against man in parliment or congress or matters of authority.

Let the men vote and the women help build the nation through teaching children how to honor the country through their words, works and their votes.

Let the guy have his opinion. All this mocking you guys do is only proving his point to him.

Nobody said he can't have his opinion, no matter how unhinged it is.

The guy is absolutely desperate for attention; the gist of every single post is "look at me. look at me".

We are just giving him what he wants.

Do you think the quality of America presidents declined after the 19th Amendment? That seems to be the question you are begging. Is that when elections started a slow spiral toward emotionalism over utility?

Let the guy have his opinion. All this mocking you guys do is only proving his point to him.

Glad you said this, I was just about to revoke his opinion rights on the federal level.

Give Remy some credit, I don't think being called a drama queen is gonna push him over the edge.

You can never tell these days.

Give Remy some credit, I don't think being called a drama queen is gonna push him over the edge.

the more you try to convince him he is wrong, the more he will believe he is right. I dont see how you win by arguing this. It would be easier to win this by conceding some women are crazy and that would be end of that topic.

Non-leftist men = incel men. What's wrong with that?

incel

noun: incel; plural noun: incels

a member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active.

What does the term ‘incel’ mean? | CNN

Predicting harm among incels (involuntary celibates): the roles of mental health, ideological belief and social networking (accessible) - GOV.UK

AI Overview:

The phrase "man vs. bear" has been co-opted by the incel subculture and other parts of the "manosphere" to justify misogynistic views. The debate began as a viral social media trend where women were asked if they would rather be alone in the woods with a man or a bear, with many choosing the bear. 

Origin of the debate

The "man vs. bear" question was initially intended to highlight the everyday fear many women experience regarding male violence and unpredictability. 

1. A bear's intentions are clear: Women explained that a bear's threat is an understandable, primal danger. If attacked by a bear, they would be universally believed.
2. A man's intentions are not: Conversely, they pointed out that a man's intentions are ambiguous. If attacked by a man, a woman might have to fight for her credibility. 

The incel subculture's response

Many men, particularly within incel communities, responded with anger and resentment, misinterpreting the women's reasoning. This reaction amplified the issue and made it fodder for the incel subculture's ideology of misogyny and victimhood. Incels and other manosphere groups used the debate to: 

1. Further dehumanize women: They interpreted women's preference for a bear as a sign that women irrationally hate and fear men. This fueled existing incel rhetoric that women are cruel, shallow, and manipulated by a "feminist gynarchy".
2. Frame themselves as victims: Incels often discussed the debate as proof that society unjustly demonizes men. This fits their core ideology of aggrieved entitlement and self-pity, positioning themselves as victims who are unfairly left behind in the "sexual marketplace".
3. Justify their hateful worldview: The controversy became another data point for their belief system, particularly the "blackpill" ideology, which preaches that their situation is hopeless due to women's innate sexual preferences and that no self-improvement will help.
4. Condone or encourage violence: Some incels used the debate to reinforce their belief that violence is a justified response to their perceived oppression. The logic extends to the idea that if women are already terrified of them, there is no consequence for acting on their violent and misogynistic fantasies. 

Wider context

The "man vs. bear" debate in the incel subculture is an example of how a mainstream discussion about gender dynamics can be absorbed and twisted by extremist online communities to advance their hateful narratives. It showcases the incel movement's deep-seated misogyny and its tendency to frame men's issues, including those rooted in toxic masculinity, as the fault of women and feminism. 

When your party says that (men are worse than bears) is not a violation of human rights and that (transwomen are equal to men (aka better than bears) ) is a violation of human rights, you sound like you're projecting.

I'm impressed by your ability to drag man vs bear and trans people into every argument.

First of all, the Democratic party (I'm guessing that's the party you meant?) has no stance on man vs bear because it was an internet meme and a small blip on the culture war radar, nothing more.

Second of all, women picking the bear does not mean men are worse than bears, it means those women fear strange men more than they fear strange bears.

Third of all, women sharing this opinion is not an assault on your rights because it's just fucking social rhetoric.

The real question is, would women rather be alone in the woods with a man who looks well-built like a bear or with a man who looks like your average American? I think we all know the answer to that, considering many women fantasize about vampires and werewolves.

Edit: WTF...now I can't unsee Frankenstein as some wild soft-porn creation of an 18-year-old girl!

Lol I mean Mary Shelley was 18 when she wrote Frankenstein...