How Donald Trump broke the American mind

Started by Sidewalker

Replies
31
Posts
32
Page
1 / 2

Conversation

#1 •••

This is a great article that helps explain Trump supporters, link and full article pasted below:


 How Donald Trump broke the American mind


How Donald Trump broke the American mind

Opinion by Sophia A. McClennen


President Donald Trump’s decision to demolish the East Wing of the White House to make way for a ballroom is classic Trumpian theater — grandiose destruction packaged as vision. But the stories of the institutions, buildings and legacies that Trump and his team have destroyed aren’t the most disturbing threats our nation faces. What’s truly at risk of collapsing is the country’s cognitive infrastructure.


The real wreckage of Trumpism isn’t political chaos or partisan decay — it’s the slow demolition of the American mind. 


The success of any autocrat lies in their ability to mesmerize their supporters and mentally paralyze the resistance. Opposition depends not only on organized protests, but on the collective capacity to think through the crisis. Despots, knowing this, endeavor to do everything in their power to shut down our ability to think outside of their established narratives. 


This means that, while turnout for the “No Kings” protests is cause for optimism, effective resistance will require more than clever signs and animated crowds. It will demand careful attention to the cognitive toll of living under an absurd autocracy that claims to defend democracy while simultaneously dismantling it. How can the collective consciousness of pro-democracy Americans withstand the mental assault of Trumpism?


The first step is to understand how these attacks on critical thinking take place. 


Trump’s assault on the American mind operates on five fronts, with each one designed to distort perception, drain attention and degrade the nation’s collective reasoning. While it can be easy to think that these are simply incidental habits or stylistic quirks, it is critical to note that they are strategic modes of cognitive domination and they have been on display since well before Trump began his first term as President.


The culture of lies

Feel tired of making sense of Trump’s lies? If that resonates, it’s because mentally processing constant lying wears you down and, over time, becomes hard to resist. 


Trump’s politics depend on what psychologists call cognitive overload. He lies so relentlessly that even his detractors become mentally fatigued as the brain’s basic truth-tracking mechanisms begin to short-circuit. Research by psychologists Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand shows that repeated exposure to falsehoods erodes the brain’s resistance: The more often we hear a claim — true or false — the more familiar, and thus believable, it feels. 


Consider one of Trump’s repeated falsehoods: That his tariffs on China brought in “billions and billions” of dollars in revenue. Fact-checkers have debunked it hundreds of times, pointing out that tariffs were largely paid by U.S. consumers, not China. Yet repeated lies often become the message. The cognitive labor of constant rebuttal — the fatigue of knowing and re-knowing the same facts — slowly wears down public reasoning.


The real cognitive toll, though, comes in the exhaustion the mind suffers in the constant rebuttal of falsehoods. Each day the administration saturates the public sphere with a constant litany of lies. Psychologists have proven that processing a culture of lies results in cognitive fatigue.


The faulty logic

If Trump’s lies weaken truth, even greater damage is done to our capacity to use reason to make sense of information.


Trumpian rhetoric relies on a rotating arsenal of cognitive traps: Whataboutism to deflect, false equivalence to confuse, red herrings to distract and gaslighting to exhaust. In fact, the Trump administration offers a constant lesson in all of the most common flaws in logical reasoning. 


For example, when it emerged that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth discussed classified U.S. military operations using the encrypted messaging application Signal, the faulty logic of the administration was on full display. The same administration that once led chants of Lock her up!” over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server now dismissed the breach as “no big deal” and a “witch hunt.”

It isn’t just that the Trump team offers an incessant flood of faulty logic. They also create an environment that makes thinking critically exceptionally difficult. As cognitive scientists Keith Stanovich and Richard West have shown, humans possess two systems of thought: One fast and emotional, the other slow and deliberative. Trump keeps the public in the first mode — triggered, reactive, impulsive. Under Trump, critical reasoning collapses from emotional overload.


The threat, then, isn’t just misinformation; it’s misreasoning. 


The misrepresentation of opponents

Trump doesn’t argue with opponents; he distorts them. Former President Joe Biden becomes “Crooked Joe.” Journalists become “enemies of the people.” Any prosecutor investigating him is “deranged” or “corrupt.” The point isn’t persuasion — it’s reframing identity. Once the label sticks, the opponent gets mired in defending themselves from the attack, leaving the control of the narrative entirely in Trump’s hands.


As I have written for Salon, Trump doesn’t just reduce opponents to absurd caricatures; he also creates false versions of their positions, a tactic that destroys the conditions for reasoned debate. By misrepresenting the views of his opponents, Trumpism forces them into a cognitive trap: They get stuck refuting the way they have been misrepresented rather than advancing their ideas. 


For those of us watching these manufactured debates, our minds get distracted by the back-and-forth between misrepresentation and defense. The result is that we can risk losing sight of the real issues we need to follow to effectively defend our democracy.  


The barrage of spectacle

Trump and his team don’t just lie, twist logic and misrepresent their opponents — they never stop. The chaos is not incidental; it’s the method. 


Long before his career in politics, Trump perfected the performance of power and honed his skills at becoming an ongoing source of attention. As Guy Debord warned in “The Society of the Spectacle,” when social life becomes mediated by images, “the spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images.” Trump is that principle embodied. From “The Apprentice” to Truth Social to his daily barrage of inane memes, Trump has turned politics into a show — collapsing governance into entertainment and politics into virality.


Processing an ongoing spectacle simply fries your brain. Neuroscientist Daniel Levitin explains that constant novelty and interruption deplete the brain’s executive functions — the very ones essential for critical thinking and judgment.


The swagger of impunity

If Trump’s lies corrode truth and critical thinking while his spectacle exhausts the mind, it is his swagger of impunity that leaves us in shock. Every smirk that follows a scandal, every boast of getting away with it, threatens to rewire the public’s moral compass. 

From claiming that he “could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and [not] lose any voters” to watching his administration violate one norm, regulation and protocol after another, Trump and his team don’t just brag about breaking rules, they get away with it. 


Hannah Arendt warned in “The Origins of Totalitarianism” that when the absurd becomes normal, thinking itself collapses. Trump’s defiance of norms, laws and political consequences boggles the mind. His followers see his shameless disregard for the law as proof of strength, not guilt. Yet, his critics reel from a growing numbness. Each unpunished act dulls outrage until the mind struggles to believe in effective guardrails to democracy. 


If you’ve found yourself burnt out, exhausted, confused, dejected and dismayed as you process the daily onslaught of the Trumpian team, you now know why. And while it might be tempting to allow awareness of these authoritarian tactics to sow depression, that would be playing right into Trump’s hands. 


Understanding the power of authoritarian confusion must breed clarity, not despair. The more we grasp how Trumpism corrodes thought, the better equipped we are to defend it — because the fight for democracy always begins in the mind.


The post How Donald Trump broke the American mind appeared first on Salon.com.


Edit comment

#2 •••
@Sidewalker
How Donald Trump broke the American mind


this suggests American mind was working fine before, and then stopped working after trump broke it. No, it was the American mind which gave us trump, not the other way around. At some point, one notices that 100 IQ people arent really much great at decision making anyway.

Edit post

#3 •••
@Sidewalker

I guess H L Mencken got it right.

Edit post

#4 •••
@SatanLucy

The American mind broke Trump.

Edit post

#5 •••

Trump put America first and broke the ceiling.

Edit post

#6 •••
@Sidewalker

Tell me when America was of one single mind to break it [allegedly].


That's communist shtick. We're individual minds, my friend, but I understand trying prop up a Penn State academic. She's as big a loser as the Nittannies were last Saturday against Ohio State. Nittany - a solitary mountain lion [as if PA has mountains anything close to the one I live on outside and above Park City]. I'm at 7500 fleet elevation, more than double anything in PA.


I read her WaPo article. A hit job that has cute interactive graphics, but it gets old [repetitive] real fast, considering that, according to Psychology Today, the average person lies 20 times daily, which makes the Trump lie count amassed by the derelict media merely average.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#7 •••
@fauxlaw

Yeah, she is not an American. Otherwise, her mind would be too broken to write a coherent piece.

Edit post

#8 •••
@fauxlaw
Tell me when America was of one single mind to break it [allegedly].

That's communist shtick. We're individual minds, my friend, but I understand trying prop up a Penn State academic. She's as big a loser as the Nittannies were last Saturday against Ohio State. Nittany - a solitary mountain lion [as if PA has mountains anything close to the one I live on outside and above Park City]. I'm at 7500 fleet elevation, more than double anything in PA.

I read her WaPo article. A hit job that has cute interactive graphics, but it gets old [repetitive] real fast, considering that, according to Psychology Today, the average person lies 20 times daily, which makes the Trump lie count amassed by the derelict media merely average.


Good MAGA, now rollover and you get a treat.


The misrepresentation of opponents

Trump doesn’t argue with opponents; he distorts them. Former President Joe Biden becomes “Crooked Joe.” Journalists become “enemies of the people.” Any prosecutor investigating him is “deranged” or “corrupt.” The point isn’t persuasion — it’s reframing identity. Once the label sticks, the opponent gets mired in defending themselves from the attack, leaving the control of the narrative entirely in Trump’s hands.


As I have written for Salon, Trump doesn’t just reduce opponents to absurd caricatures; he also creates false versions of their positions, a tactic that destroys the conditions for reasoned debate. By misrepresenting the views of his opponents, Trumpism forces them into a cognitive trap: They get stuck refuting the way they have been misrepresented rather than advancing their ideas. 


For those of us watching these manufactured debates, our minds get distracted by the back-and-forth between misrepresentation and defense. The result is that we can risk losing sight of the real issues we need to follow to effectively defend our democracy.  

.



Edit post

#9 •••
@Sidewalker
The result is that we can risk losing sight of the real issues we need to follow to effectively defend our democracy.  


Why does this one person writing this get to decide what the "real issues" are? Doesn't seem very democratic.

Edit post

#10 •••
The result is that we can risk losing sight of the real issues we need to follow to effectively defend our democracy.  

Why does this one person writing this get to decide what the "real issues" are? Doesn't seem very democratic.


How dare her, only the glorious leader decides what the issues are.


"The point isn’t persuasion — it’s reframing identity.... the opponent gets mired in defending themselves from the attack, leaving the control of the narrative entirely in Trump’s hands."


What she had to say is no longer the issue, what she said is irrelevent, her right to say it is the issue, fascists don't like free speech.


Good MAGA, you get a treat.

Edit post

#11 •••

Last year, a survey of more than 150 historians ranked Trump as the worst President in American history. Trump has done nothing early in his second term to indicate the historians were wrong.

Edit post

#12 •••
@Sidewalker

Great article, and something I’ve been saying for quite some time now - there are many reasons to despise what Trump is doing but the worst thing imho is what he’s doing to our collective IQ. Russia and other dictatorships world wide are laughing their assesses off at how stupid we’ve become and how preoccupied we’ve been with utter nonsense. It weakens us in every way far worse than anything they could have accomplished.

Edit post

#13 •••
@SatanLucy
it was the American mind which gave us trump, not the other way around


The two play off of each other. Stupid people always existed, what Trump did was he brought those people into the mainstream. They looked at Trump saying all the stupid and ignorant things they were thinking and it legitimized them, so they became loyal to him, and voted for him. Then once he became the candidate and later the president he would command the biggest microphone on earth to continue spreading this nonsense.


Politics has long been problematic, but I do miss the days back when it was handled by adults. Trump ended that.

Edit post

#14 •••
@fauxlaw
That's communist shtick. We're individual minds, my friend, but I understand trying prop up a Penn State academic.


Social psychology is a real thing. Really.

Edit post

#15 •••
@Sidewalker

It just comes across more like a lecture rather than a persuasive piece. There's no objective "real issue" except the one she says exists. That sounds oddly....undemocratic? How about, (wild thought) we leave such a decision to the people and neither your bombastic president Trump nor this obscure and condescending author. That would come across as a lot more like an actual democracy and nothing described in your posted article.

Edit post

#16 •••
@Double_R

You are blaming trump because Americans are stupid? I dont think that is trumps fault. If you are stupid, someone will eventually screw you.

Edit post

#17 •••
@SatanLucy

A fool and his money are soon parted, no matter who you vote for.

Edit post

#18 •••

Its like blaming Hitler because Germans followed him. At some point, we have to start blaming people for their own stupidity.

Edit post

#19 •••
@SatanLucy

It's like blaming SNAP for being so fat and lazy. That was always a part of the person, regardless of the circumstances.

Edit post

#20 •••
It just comes across more like a lecture rather than a persuasive piece. There's no objective "real issue" except the one she says exists. That sounds oddly....undemocratic? How about, (wild thought) we leave such a decision to the people and neither your bombastic president Trump nor this obscure and condescending author. That would come across as a lot more like an actual democracy and nothing described in your posted article.


Free speech is undemocratic lol...how's that for a broken mind.


"Democracy is talking itself to death” - Benito Mussolini


A few other Fascist quotes about suppressing free speech:


"When 97 percent of the stories are bad about a person, it's no longer free speech" – Donald Trump (On negative news coverage being illegal)


"I would think maybe their license should be taken away" – Donald Trump (On news networks that criticize him)


"We're going to have people sue you like you've never got sued before" – Donald Trump (To reporters on promise to change libel laws to make it easier to sue journalists and news outlets for criticism)


“Critics of the Supreme Court should be put in jail” – Donald Trump (On women protesting the reversal of Roe vs Wade)



Edit post

#21 •••
@Double_R

I have no doubt that social psychology is an actual shtick; I just think it is often practiced poorly. Why do you think it's called "practice?" Because that term is often only applied to "professionals."

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#22 •••
@SatanLucy
this suggests American mind was working fine before, and then stopped working after trump broke it. No, it was the American mind which gave us trump, not the other way around. At some point, one notices that 100 IQ people arent really much great at decision making anyway.

Very well said

Edit post

#23 •••
@SatanLucy
You are blaming trump because Americans are stupid?


No, I blame him for legitimizing stupidity.

Edit post

#24 •••
@Shoresy
There's no objective "real issue" except the one she says exists. That sounds oddly....undemocratic?


An author giving their opinion on what the issues are does not conflict in any way with democracy. You are really contorting yourself to hold onto this point.


How about, (wild thought) we leave such a decision to the people


We don’t get to decide whether it’s left to her or the people, she doesn’t get to decide whether it’s up to the people, because it is up to the people. That’s how democracy works.


The only time the issue of whether it’s up to the people is in question is when those threatening it hold positions of actual power. That power is held by politicians, not authors.

Edit post

#25 •••
@Double_R
No, I blame him for legitimizing stupidity.


Maybe start blaming Americans for being stupid. trump was just smart enough to profit from their stupidity. I am glad you think trump is smart.

Edit post

#26 •••
@fauxlaw
I have no doubt that social psychology is an actual shtick; I just think it is often practiced poorly. Why do you think it's called "practice?" Because that term is often only applied to "professionals."


Yeah, who needs science when you have conspiracy theories LOL.

Edit post

#27 •••
@SatanLucy

Exactly

Edit post

#28 •••
@SatanLucy
Maybe start blaming Americans for being stupid.


I do, I’ve talked about it many times. Two things can both be true.


trump was just smart enough to profit from their stupidity. I am glad you think trump is smart.


Profiting off of stupid people is neither a sign of intelligence nor is it impressive. To the extent it measures anything it’s depravity, and in Trump’s case there’s certainly no shortage on that.


Trump is the product of a perfect storm that all came together to lift him up. He inherited much of his wealth, which he then combined with his ego and narcissism to make other people think he was some real estate genius by putting his name everywhere. Then TV producers decided to utilize the false image he created and bolster him in the process. Then his pathological lying combined with his ability to sense a sucker lead to him conning people into thinking he was the solution to their problems. Problems created by years of the wealthy controlling an increasingly large portion of our economy while leaving everyone else behind. All of this made the country ripe for a figure just like him.


No one else could get away with what he did. He’s a moron who sounds like a moron, but stupid people believe him where others would be laughed off the stage because of his image as a genius which was created by TV and propaganda over the prior 40 years.


Good luck replacing that.

Edit post

#29 •••

Have you seen the great nude pictures of Melania? I can see why Christians love her!

Edit post

#30 •••
@FLRW

Why didn’t Trump include them in his Trump bibles. He would have sold more copies.?

Edit post