A decent social safety net... as a means of preventing fascism

Started by linate

Replies
48
Posts
49
Page
2 / 2

Conversation

#31 •••
@GreatfulGoy

We already have. Canada is captured, and no longer functions as a nation. It's just an economic zone to be plundered. Canada is the endgame of late-stage globalism. There's no reason to sacrifice for the future of Canada anymore. First nations don't care about ownership or stewardship, sacrificing or building. They just want a seat at the plunder table. It's a nomadic tradition from the Mongols to the Vikings.


The cultural purpose of westerners is to own the land with an obligation to develop and build it to hand down to an unseen generation across a nation. First peoples' cultural purpose is closer to being owned by the land with a cultural purpose that starts and ends with the local tribe.


So when you say First Nations want to "own the land" that is straight up ethnocentrism. America's failed Indian reservations are a testament to those mismatched cultural purposes.

Edit post

#32 •••

Canada is widely considered a very stable country, ranking high globally for political stability, economic strength, and quality of life, thanks to strong institutions, rule of law, robust banking, and social systems, although challenges like housing affordability exist. It's known for a secure environment for business, low corruption, and high living standards, attracting investment and immigrants. 


Key Indicators of Stability:

  1. Political Stability: 
  2. Canada boasts strong democratic values, transparent governance, and respect for human rights, with low corruption and high political stability rankings. 

  3. Economic Strength: 
  4. It's recognized for a sound financial sector (safe banks), strong fiscal health (among G20/G7), and a stable, open business environment attracting foreign investment. 

  5. Quality of Life: 
  6. High rankings for education, healthcare, safety, and social support systems contribute to its appeal as a place to live and work. 

Areas of Strength:

  1. Banking: Canadian banks are among the world's safest and most stable. 

  2. Investment: A predictable business environment makes it a top destination for global investment. 

  3. Social Fabric: Strong social support and human rights frameworks underpin its stability. 

Challenges: 


  1. While generally strong, Canada faces domestic concerns, particularly in areas like housing affordability, where it ranks lower among developed nations.

In summary, Canada's consistent high rankings across stability, economy, and quality of life metrics solidify its reputation as a secure and stable nation, despite some specific domestic challenges. 


Edit post

#33 •••
@wylted


is your position really that wasteful spending isn't rampant in government?


Yes. First of all, I was actually talking about fraud, not waste. Fraud is the word right wingers use because it sounds ominous, but as soon as they find their hands on the steering wheel they somehow are unable to figure out where it is. That’s why, despite DOGE bragging endlessly about how much fraud they eliminated, they still haven’t made any notable arrests yet. Because it was always bullshit. Which is not to say it’s not happening anywhere, but that it’s no where near as pervasive as the propaganda arm of this administration alleges.


But when it comes to waste, that’s kind of a pointless conversation because waste turns out to be any form of government spending you don’t like. And when your political ideology is basically “government = bad”, it becomes meaningless to even bother using the word.


examples of government waste you claim is non existent despite evidence that the government is imperfect


I know you really thought you were flexing right here, but you only proved my point. Trump created an entire department whose sole mission in life was to find fraud and waste. They found no fraud, and with regards to waste, your list includes something like $15M in a budget of almost $7T. If your point was to prove how efficient the government is, the fact that this was the most impactful list you could come up with certainly proves it.


Moreover, most of the examples provided are not nearly as wasteful as you all pretend. You guys like to use buzzwords to describe them while having no idea what they actually do or why we have an interest in it. That’s exactly the ignorance I was talking about. Pick any one item on this list and we can look at it together to assess just how wasteful it was.


it's always been the position its better to cut too deep and make some mistakes since that is easily reversible than it is to not go deep enough considering how rare government spending cuts are.


Said no responsible governing party, ever. This philosophy is absurd on its face, cutting agencies and laying off workers by the thousands, only to have to recall them wastes significant resources both during and after the occurrence as it is extremely chaotic. It causes delays in the system which have to be rectified, it causes progress to be lost which then has to be gain all over again, and the workers in those cases often get back pay so you can end up paying triple for what turns out to be less than what you would have gotten if you just left it alone.


But what these blunders really demonstrate is that this wasn’ta matter of DOGE “cutting too deep”, it means they had no idea what they were doing at all. It would be one thing to lay off workers and find yourself dealing with unintended consequences of those layoffs, but that’s not what this is. What this shows is that they themselves didn’t have any idea what the people they were firing even do. That is unforgivable stupidity. Do not try and spin that into a virtue, that just shows you to be fundamentally unserious.


also it was a Biden official who demanded the pointless slaughter of poultry to artificially raise prices.


It wasn’t pointless, that’s just your ignorance showing… again. The purpose of killing a portion of the stock was to prevent the spread of avian flu, which has the potential to be FAR more catastrophic than the price increases we we ended up seeing.


Illegals can't pay taxes because employers have to pay them off the books and yet still use american resources also per the law of supply and demand artificially deflate wages while simultaneously increasing housing costs.


Illegals pay taxes through ITIN’s or borrowed social security numbers, not to mention sales and gas taxes. It’s a fact that undocumented immigrants contribute tens of billions of dollars to federal state and local taxes, while they cannot collect the benefits their native born counterparts do. Every study on this finds them to be a net positive or at the very least self sufficient.


Then can drive down wages in specific sectors, but to the extent that is true it translates to lower prices for the rest of us and in most cases these are the jobs Americans don’t even want to do in the first place.


Housing is one of those examples. Who do you think is building them? Getting rid of all undocumented workers will cause construction costs to rise.


No serious study on any of this finds that our economy will benefit from getting rid of these people.


Let me tell you we can simultaneously remove lazy employees and reward good ones with good pay increases while also creating computer programs to implement zero trust architecture to increase due diligence and make fraud less likely.


Yeah, technological advancements can help make us more efficient. Ground breaking thinking there.


What I was responding to was the idea that you’re just going to walk into an agency, fire half the staff, and think that by doing so you’ve made everything more efficient. That’s just plain stupid. Technology adaptation happens gradually as your team learns and effectuates its implementation. Doesn’t matter how advanced it is, you have to build it into your operating procedures. That takes people.

Edit post

#34 •••
@Double_R
What I was responding to was the idea that you’re just going to walk into an agency, fire half the staff, and think that by doing so you’ve made everything more efficient. 


Correct. If the department is stopping innovation and progress, as most government agencies do, firing half the staff is a great start.

Edit post

#35 •••

It worked for Elon Musk and made him the richest man on the planet.

Edit post

#36 •••
@Double_R
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#37 •••
@wylted

Oh, I’m not confused, I see exactly what you are doing.


You’re not using fraud in the normal sense because you know that’s not happening the way you guys say, which is why no one on the right is even questioning why if DOGE discovered all this fraud which they then eliminated… where are the charges?


No, what you guys are doing is being fundamentally dishonest. The word fraud carries with it a strong emotional connotation because how the word is actually used to mean. So when you scream fraud, you’re attempting to elicit those emotions from your audience without earning it and where it doesn’t belong. That’s called propaganda.


To accomplish this in a way that passes the sniff test (at least to a certain group of people) you conflate “fraud” with “waste” and then conflate “waste” with “any government spending I disagree with”. You were quick to copy and paste your little list up there of all the “waste”, but did you even look into why any of those programs were instituted? No, you read the right wing headline and that was good enough for you.

Edit post

#38 •••
@Double_R
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#39 •••
@wylted

Trump,is hellbent of controlling spending. He wants to use his crypto currency to defend the dollar.

Edit post

#40 •••
@wylted
You don't need to look at why those things are instituted.


OMG.


If you are going to criticize government spending to the point of calling it waste, then yes, you need to know what the spending is for. This is basic common sense.


You have all the context you need there.


You don’t have any content there, all you have are right wing labels depicting these programs as caricatures of what they actually are and what they were actually for. But you wouldn’t know that because you wouldn’t even bother to look into them.


It would be tedious to look at everything


Yes, it turns out that leading the free world is a complex job that requires an interest and capacity in nuance. Welcome to the real world.


As for eliciting an emotional reaction. It should.


Whether it should is a question answered by the facts surrounding the issue, which would cannot even be bothered to look into so your opinion here is utterly useless.


We know it harms society as a hole to do anything on that list I posted, and yet it's done for some apparent reason.


The reasons are right there at your finger tips, but you cannot be bothered


We are literally doomed if we do not get spending under control.


Your examples account for a few million dollars out of a $7T budget. That’s not even enough to qualify as a rounding error.

Edit post

#41 •••
@Double_R

The deficit will continue to grow unless government spending is under control.

Edit post

#42 •••
@Double_R
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#43 •••
@wylted

Trump will not let China become the next leader of the world. He will even try fora third term to stop that from happening.

Edit post

#44 •••
@wylted
It would be rather tedious for me to create a one million page PDF for you.


The list you presented was tedious enough… for the people who compiled it. All you did was copy and paste it without knowing about anything that was on it.


Not really just ideological purity. Several decades of philosophical argumentation and reasoning to acquire the best philosophy and then apply it consistently.


Not sure what point you were trying to make. Philosophy is useless when you’re starting off with fantasy.


How were those things in the list mischaracterized? 


Start looking into them and you’ll find out

Edit post

#45 •••
@Double_R

He is asking for specifics.

Edit post

#46 •••
@Debby

I believe that the U.S. government is urgently required to reduce the government deficit. Military spending must be eliminated as much as possible. For many years the U.S. has been military aid for many allied countries of the West. For example, many member countries of

NATO have been greatly protected from being invaded from anti-West countries and radical groups.

Stopping foreign military aid would contribute to reducing huge government debt.

Many younger military staff have been facing the danger, unexpected accidents and the threat of death in the far distant foreign countries for

many years. Coping with this situation, the U.S. is eagerly planning for using highly sophisticated and epoch-making military weapons like

various kinds of drones which are controlled and operated by AI technologies. They are being expected to contribute to saving the military

spending too much. However, highly operating skills are needed to operate those weapons for military personnel.

Therefore, institutions are being established to learn and get the knowledge how to use them effectively for prospective younger military personnel. 1)

Less military spending contributes to increasing the budget for social welfare program such as unemployment benefit and aid for medical spending among low-waged workers. These measures contribute to preventing the collapse of society and the road to fascism.


1) ``America needs a new definition of service``, The New York Times International Edition, December 20-21, 2025



Edit post

#47 •••
@dreamer

Doesn’t make sense in light of Trump taking over Venezuela after capturing Mudoro. It will require American troops on the ground.

Edit post

#48 •••
@Debby

I believe whether using hardware or drones aided by AI technologies depends too much on a situation where military forces face on a

battle ground.

Edit post

#49 •••
@dreamer

Trump has no clue. He evaded the draft because of bone spurs. His father suffered from dementia.

Edit post