A future nation of singles

Started by RemyBrown

Replies
45
Posts
46
Page
1 / 2

Conversation

#1 •••
⚠️ This post has been marked as offensive.

Edit comment

#2 •••
@RemyBrown

Lonely women don't exist unless they are over 23 years old.


If woman is 18 years old, she is only lonely if she chooses to be, assuming she isn't terribly ugly.


Women need to get used to new standards where they are desirable only until age 23.


After age 23, if she isn't lucky to get married by then, she is going to be lonely and forced to marry the worst of men because no one else wants her.


As a man, I am naturally attracted to women who are better at giving birth, and women after age 23 are much inferior there.


Women need to learn that we only value them for their looks and ability to give birth, and women past age 23 are worse in both areas.

Edit post

#3 •••
@SatanLucy

Younger women like the security older men offer. This rules you out as someone 30 going on 13 with no money.

Edit post

#4 •••
@Debby
Younger women like the security older men offer


Actually, I will be rich in future. I am just not rich now, which is really the fault of my parents more than it is mine. When you have 70 IQ parents who broke 20 phone chargers in one year because they cant figure out how to use a modern phone charger, you know your starting point is significantly weakened.

Edit post

#5 •••
@RemyBrown

Lesbianism is another option, and is a recreational sex activity that is growing in popularity.


And right wing man will learn to openly enjoy the company of right wing man...No need to hide it in the closet...Out ya cum boys.


And procreation will eventually be regulated and carried out in secure facilities.


Such will be one aspect of human development within the greater context of material and technological evolution.


Perhaps.

Edit post

#6 •••
@SergeantLynch
And right wing man will learn to openly enjoy the company of right wing man...No need to hide it in the closet...Out ya cum boys


So you think people will turn gay. That's a smart strategy. Two men who are single can be together instead of looking for women.

Edit post

#7 •••
@SergeantLynch
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#8 •••
@RemyBrown

Women live longer are better insulated, and in terms of academic sciences generally out perform males...And the future will depend as much upon clever people as it will upon strong aggressively stupid people...And eggs are important of course.

Edit post

#9 •••
@SatanLucy

Well, I am of the opinion that people either choose to enjoy recreational homosexuality or not, relative to a raft of socio-psychological pressures.


It really is just a method of achieving sexual satisfaction and temporarily quelling procreational urges.


I don't think that we were natural pair bonders, that's just another socio-psychological development...I suspect that we originally formed family groups headed by an alfa-male, so I further suspect that sexual satisfaction for non-breeding males was achieved manually, homosexually or sneakily when the alfa wasn't looking.

Edit post

#10 •••
@SergeantLynch
Well, I am of the opinion that people either choose to enjoy recreational homosexuality


I dont need to choose homosexuality. I have online friendships with girls, and that is enough for me so I dont have to turn gay yet. Another advantage of online friendships is that I dont ever have to meet them, which is good because I hate real life conversations. Its just casual talk online about normal things, not seeking relationship, but still enough to keep me from turning gay.

Edit post

#11 •••
@SatanLucy

Turning gay is a somewhat silly expression.


As you said, you make choices.

Edit post

#12 •••
@SergeantLynch
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#13 •••
@RemyBrown

Well, if evolution stagnates then men with lots of money will be a factor of a stagnate ecosystem...Though evolutionary stagnation will somewhat put a damper on the development of manufactured eggs.


But material progression is seemingly inevitable, so real AI might just do away with us all...Though for a while AI will need the dexterity that humans offer.


Not sure if money will be as important in an AI dominated universe.

Edit post

#14 •••
@SergeantLynch
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#15 •••
@RemyBrown

Yep, but is that all there is to everything Remy.


Are we just random blobs of organic goo thrashing around on this tiny speck of cosmic dust.


Is there no greater objective, other than to have our "stuff".

Edit post

#16 •••
@SergeantLynch
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#17 •••
@RemyBrown

Yep, that's fine and a hormonally driven male strategy, but nonetheless selfish and temporary.


I like to think more broadly, now that I no longer need to compete procreationally.

Edit post

#18 •••
@SergeantLynch
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#19 •••
@RemyBrown
It's politically.


Same basic hormone driven strategy of strength and dominance to achieve satisfaction... Though for sure the human has adapted according to intellectual and social development needs.


And yes, if a greater goal is to be achieved then AI will certainly need to evolve much further, which I suppose one might suggest depends upon a sort of procreation of information.


How the human machine will cope/keep up, remains to be seen...Though certainly, modifying procreational strategy is perhaps a reasonable idea.


Nonetheless, scientists predict another billion years of life support left in the planet, so a way to go yet...And in respect of a greater purpose, I guess that universal material development is on track.


As I see it there are two ways of moving forwards:


  1. Carry on as we do now, somewhat chaotically.
  2. All work together, which would perhaps achieve results more quickly.


Though for now and for sometime to come, progress to a large extent will be dictated and stymied by the human condition.

Edit post

#20 •••
@RemyBrown

recent data shows a significant trend of women, especially younger women (Gen Z), leaning more liberal and identifying as liberal more frequently than men, creating a notable gender gap in politics, with trends seen in support for progressive social norms and environmental issues

. While women have historically shown liberal tendencies in some areas, this divide has widened, with Gen Z women being the most liberal cohort, often driven by differing views on social change and experiences with patriarchal systems compared to young men. 

Edit post

#21 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#22 •••
@RemyBrown

That is a choice to keep abortion legal at 15 weeks or to accept a total ban altogether.

Edit post

#23 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#24 •••
@RemyBrown

No, I think abortion should be legal nationwide and a woman should have the right to choose over her own body.

Edit post

#25 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#26 •••
@RemyBrown

It should go back to the original 20 weeks.

Edit post

#27 •••
@Debby
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#28 •••
@RemyBrown

It was a reasonable number to give the women enough time to make a decision.

Edit post

#29 •••
@RemyBrown

Bruh this is legitimately one of the things that most fills me with dread. In the USA we’ve already had a below replacement birthrate for like 20 years now (closer to 50 if you only look at native born Americans.) Up until the 2010s the dating market was so much better than it is today and virtually all married/childbearing couples coupled up in better eras.


When I view my own circumstances it feels like getting the last chopper out of ‘Nam


although your misogyny here is extremely cringe and a part of the problem lol. “Now, women went from saying, "If you voted for Trump in 2024, then you're ghosted permanently." to having itchy vaginas saying, "We won't want you if you're conservative, but change your views and THEN we will accept you!"” yeah I don’t think that’s what happened lol. And the idea that young men DONT want to have sex with women couldn’t be more wrong and to the extent there’s any truth to it, it’s a sign of something significantly worse than anything political.


I see common mistakes and bad behavior with both genders. The gender war stuff is extremely cringe to me and a sign of a culture that definitely is not going to make it. Men and women are two parts of the same coin, society only continues when they work together towards a unified goal. They are quite literally (and unsurprisingly if you think about it for more than 15 seconds) the perfect complements to each other. If they’re having issues coupling up it makes no sense to blame women or to blame men, it represents something deeply wrong which is unsurprising giving how far away we are from our ancestral environment. We simply were not built for modernity and it’s unclear what if anything is going to come out of this

Edit post

#30 •••

Just wait until a huge portion of the population gets one shot by AI generated “social” media feeds that not only find but actually create content exactly suited to what you want to see. We’ll be longing for the days of a 1.5 tfr. I hope I’m wrong but I don’t think I am

Edit post