He was once a Democrat, and that's the entire Democrat schtick re: Trump

Started by fauxlaw

Replies
64
Posts
65
Page
1 / 3

Conversation

#1 •••

https://www.cnn.com/2015/07/21/politics/donald-trump-election-democrat


Wow, me citing Cartoon News Network? Didn't see that one coming, but, just goes to show that this appears to be the Democrats' real beef against Trump: they just could not hold on to him. Just think, he should have run in 2016 for the Democrats, and all his antics since would have been applauded, rather than hated. But, considering how well the Democrats conducted their autopsy on loss of the 2024 campaign, clearly, they lack an ability to understand loss, at all. Quelle domage. Just remember; they even tossed out a Kennedy!

Edit comment

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#2 •••
@fauxlaw

Trump would have lost as a Democrat that is why he switched even though he contributed a lot to Democratic candidates. But his policies are more inclined towards Republicans. Republican MAGA.

Edit post

#3 •••
@Debby

I don't dispute Trump's "democrat" was Kennedy-esque, not today's progressive/socialist.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#4 •••
@fauxlaw

After Obama permanently and decisively redefined the Democrat party, turning it into a Chicago-style grift machine, essentially destroying both parties, that gave Trump the only possible window to run and win. When politics stops being about policy and persuasion and starts being about raw control, the only viable counter is a chaotic disruptor. Someone loud, unembarrassed, immune to shaming, and willing to smash power control norms instead of respecting them. It's why they could jail him, have him shot at, and the Chicago-style tactics failed completely against him, whereas Romney and McCain flopped hard against the grift machine. Romney was destroyed with a stupid story about abusing his family dog....

Edit post

#5 •••
@Shoresy

Good assessment. Yeah, Can you imagine that although disruptive himself, Oba'a would not fit into Trump's suit [i.e., his ways and means of negotiation that includes hit-back-harder] I don't think Oba'a was ever a boxer, and I'm not sure about Trump, but he has the moves - and I don't mean his fist-dancing.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#6 •••
@fauxlaw
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#7 •••
@Shoresy

Being Canadian, are you amused, disgusted, quizzical, or non-committal about American politics, in general? What Province is home?

Personally, I've been all except non-committal. And I now live outside Park City, UT [very liberal as UT generally goes, but they even elected Johnson in 1964 [kennedy's VP; the only Democrat UT ever elected, I think], at 7500 feet in a forest.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#8 •••
@fauxlaw
⚠️ This comment has been marked as offensive.

Edit post

#9 •••

That is why Trump started MAGA and reminds his listeners he is all for America First.

Edit post

#10 •••
@Shoresy

I agree with all of your first paragraph [post #8] as to the conditions in the western hemisphere compared to the demise of earlier cultures and empires, but have some disagreement with the 2nd ¶. I do not think it is in the scheme of things that China/Russia axis [far more likely that Japan/India] to rise to dominance of the world before the Second Coming of Christ, who will then establish himself as the world government.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#11 •••
@fauxlaw

China already produce the majority of the bibles printed today Russia is China’s strongest ally.

Edit post

#12 •••
@Debby

Yes, China produces the most print versions, and curiously - and one reason why I think China talks communism, but they think capitalism, is because 1/3 of their Bible production is for Chinese consumption. However, digital versions exceed the number of print versions annually since 2024, and most production comes out of Brazil.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#13 •••
@fauxlaw

The Trump bibles were printed in China for $5 and sold by Trump for $60. China is making Christians richer.

Edit post

#14 •••
@Debby

What's wrong with being rich? If you're not, why not? The mirror is the nemesis. I've told you that mirrors are a conspiracy. Don't believe it? Well, there you go.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#15 •••
@fauxlaw

So China is making Christians richer. They are also printing more bibles for distribution. They should receive the most favoured status in heaven.

Edit post

#16 •••
@Debby

I don't think heaven cares much for purely earthly labels. Didn't the Tower of Babel teach us that? Who bloody cares if one was once Chinese, American, French, or Venezuelan? That's all politics, and I think that is useless to heaven. We're still stuck in Babylon and it's time we moved on.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#17 •••
@fauxlaw

But spreading the word of God by printing bibles is appreciated by God. China prints the majority of bibles in distribution.

Edit post

#18 •••
@Debby

No, since China "prints" and that digital bibles exceed the count of printed bibles from

China, and China is not the leader of digital version [I don't know if they produce digitals at all], that distinction belongs to Brazil. I said that, already.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#19 •••
@fauxlaw

Most Porn is digital too. Owning a hard copy of the Bible shows commitment. Paying $60 for a 5$ Bible printed in China shows commitment to Trump.

Edit post

#20 •••
this appears to be the Democrats' real beef against Trump: they just could not hold on to him.


Democrats beef with Trump began when he rose to prominence by boosting a fundamentally racist charge; that our first black president isn’t an American. Then followed it up by launching his political career declaring that Mexicans in this country are criminals and rapists. From there, his childishness, petulance, narcissism, and ignorance did the rest.


The idea that the core resentment driving it all is that he isn’t one of us is hilariously delusional.

Edit post

#21 •••
@Double_R

It's fundamentally racist to claim all people with black skin are American.


Also, Mexico isn't listed as a race under any of the phrenology dogma describing the functional religion of racism.

I get that Trump doesn't go to your church, and you have every right to declare him an infidel.

Edit post

#22 •••
@fauxlaw

There is 0% chance, in any universe, that trump could have even had the oppurtunity to be considered as a democrat candidate. The democrats are a real party with experienced and educated members. Compare that to trump and his administration of losers. He only succeeded as a republican due to the republican voter base being... poorly made.

Edit post

#23 •••
@UmbrellaCorp

But MAGA isn't remotely conservative.


Conservative means let America be, not make it great. Every change he made recently were things Obama and Bill Clinton promised.


There is 0% chance, in any universe,that trump could have even had the oppurtunity to be considered as a democrat candidate


I agree, a 2025 Democrat has an insane rulebook to follow. Trump just filled the vacuum created when the Democrat party jumped out of the Overton Window.

Edit post

#24 •••
@Shoresy

1) What?

2) Bot?

Edit post

#25 •••

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Homan

In 2015, the Obama administration awarded him a Presidential Rank Award as a Distinguished Executive. The Washington Post wrote, "Thomas Homan deports people. And he's really good at it."

Edit post

#26 •••

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SJRk5PV588Q

Contrast MAGA with Kamala declaring that she wouldn't do anything different from Biden, and it's clear the American parties are functionally reversing their roles, where Democrants will fight tooth and nail for status quo(conservative), and MAGA wants real change(progressive). Democrats are acting as the party of maintenance while MAGA is acting as the party of change, which is why the rhetoric feels inverted, and massive amounts of gaslighting are required to keep the game going.

Edit post

#27 •••

Democrats are shown gains in Congress and Senate seats. Hope they pull a majority and impeach Trump again.

Edit post

#28 •••
@Debby

Bot

Edit post

#29 •••
@UmbrellaCorp

Sorry to bring about another brain freeze in you. You should have warned us about your condition.

Edit post

#30 •••

bot

Edit post