Does anyone here actually defend the republican tax cuts in recent decades?

Started by linate

Replies
45
Posts
46
Page
2 / 2

Conversation

#31 •••
What burial expense claim? What they have on record is a roomful of clowns at IRS who don't know living or dead. Typical givernment clerks. Woke.


It was a vast IRS conspiracy; he was framed LOL.


Woke reared its ugly head and turned him into a victim.


This just gets funnier and funnier.

Edit post

#32 •••
Damn! I'm dealing with mental midgetry, here. For the umpteenth time: I AM NOT DEAD. THERE ARE NO DEATH BENEFITS CLAIMED.
IT WAS THE #@%%@#@# IRS WHO ERRED IN DECLARING ME DEAD. GET IT? YET? JUST STOP.

YES, I AM PISSED.


Relax, take a deep breath, close your eyes and count to ten...




Edit post

#33 •••
@wylted
And "big balls" is literally a genius who decoded an ancient text with his self-made AI program that you could never accomplish in two lifetimes.


Praise Bigballs.

Edit post

#34 •••
@Sidewalker

He is pointing to two urine samples he provided while he was PISSED.

Edit post

#35 •••

304

Edit post

#36 •••

He is showing the pain he underwent to provide those urine samples.

Edit post

#37 •••
@wylted
It's always better to cut too deep when removing waste as you can immediately hire back.


Just because you don’t know what someone does for a living or why it matters doesn’t make their work waste, it just makes you ignorant.


The fact that they had to immediately hire back people on multiple occasions because it was only in their immediate absence that they discovered what these people did, unquestionably proves that they had no idea what they were doing. And again, the key phrase here is “immediate absence”. That’s to say nothing about the long term damages yet to be discovered given that they were, again, fired by people who didn’t know what they do in the first place.


You’re not coming from a place of logic and reason, this argument is pure partisan hackery. You have bought into the right wing ideology that any government position is by definition bad, so firing government workers is inherently good. With that starting point there is nothing they could have done that you would disagree with. It’s religious level fanaticism.


He's never deviated from his pro choice stance


He’s literally told the story of meeting a great kid whose mom wanted to abort him as his stated reason for switching to pro life. But tell me more.


Also, please stop being pathetically devout to MAGA. The guy appointed justices to the Supreme Court because of their opposition to Roe v Wade who would eventually overturn it, so he’s literally responsible for the illegality of abortion all throughout this country. To credit him as being pro choice is unbelievably stupid.


And "big balls" is literally a genius


His IQ is irrelevant to whether he is qualified enough and mature enough to be given the responsibility of deciding the fate of thousands upon thousands of government workers, many of whom have been in their professions since he was sucking his mothers tits.


his self made AI program that you could never accomplish in two lifetimes. 


I built from scratch the scheduling program my company uses to cover its daily operation. What used to take weeks of training and sometimes hours per day of manual work is now done in a few minutes. After years of searching for an external company that could offer this and being told over and over again that their software didn’t have those capabilities, I decided to just make it myself, using excel.


So yeah, totally irrelevant but I’m not totally impressed by someone who’s able to build software. That still doesn’t qualify them to fire thousands of people in positions he has no concept of.

Edit post

#38 •••
@Double_R
so firing government workers is inherently good.


It's only "inherently" good if your ideological goal is classical liberalism.


If your ideological goal parallels Marxism or Fascism, then it's inherently evil.


That still doesn’t qualify them to fire thousands of people in positions he has no concept of.

It's just recommendations. Just like your software ran recommendations. Someone else chooses to act on the data.

Edit post

#39 •••
@Shoresy
It's only "inherently" good if your ideological goal is classical liberalism.

If your ideological goal parallels Marxism or Fascism, then it's inherently evil.


Or, your goal could be for a government that is producing the best benefit to cost ratio reasonably possible. Ever think of that? No, of course not.


It's just recommendations.


Recommendations that were clearly acted upon with little to no oversight.



Edit post

#40 •••
@Double_R
Or, your goal could be for a government that is producing the best benefit to cost ratio reasonably possible. Ever think of that? No, of course not.


Every Marxist and Fascist most certainly did. The proper term is "best intentions."

Edit post

#41 •••
@Shoresy

So Shoresy, what's the point of eight point something billion blobs of organic goo, and all their associated infrastructure and incessant squabbling over resources and money.


Fucked if I know.



Edit post

#42 •••
@SergeantLynch

That's what religion is for.

Edit post

#43 •••
@Shoresy

Do you think that the religious leaders of the World, actually believe in God...Or are they just taking the piss?


I'm guessing it's a case of, that they're just as gullible as every other theist, but slightly cleverer in the wealth and power department.

Edit post

#44 •••
@Shoresy
Every Marxist and Fascist most certainly did. The proper term is "best intentions."


In other words, “my religion forbids me from accepting that government could ever do anything good, so I’ll just find a catch phrase to avoid me ever having to justify my position or even think it through any further”.


Noted.

Edit post

#45 •••
@Double_R

Ty for sharing your religion with us.

Edit post

#46 •••
@Double_R

Most religions are anti-government.

Edit post