Attack on Iran - A very very stupid mistake

Started by SatanLucy

Replies
67
Posts
68
Page
2 / 3

Conversation

#31 •••
@Shoresy

@#29

I sometimes think America and perhaps the West, 'should have just attempted to conquer the world right after WW2.

. . .

Nations with nukes, generally don't want, and often don't 'let nations without nukes, acquire nukes.

An obviously unequal relationship.

And of course, for governments without nukes, their 'wanting nukes makes perfect sense.

Though arguably power can be achieved without nukes. One just has to be less antagonistic about it.

. . .


Let's say we 'don't attack Iran here,

Are our goals and plans suddenly going to align?

Will we share similar morals and values?

Unlikely I think.


Though that is not to say that 'I am saying military action against Iran right now is or is not moral or strategically sound.

. . .


But there is my tribalism again, and my dislike of tolerance, accepting of others values, weakening of one's own tribe.

(Shrug) But I am more Nihilistic and Self Centered, than I am Tribalistic.

. . . There is also my view that 'America is not so much a Tribe as a coalition of Tribes.

. . . Admittedly perhaps 'all very large Tribes 'are coalitions of many Tribes. But I think their is more disunity, lack of shared values in America, compared to some other nations.

'Yes there are the ideals of Freedom, Constitution.

. . . But I- No, (Shrug) I've said enough.

Edit post

#32 •••
@Leaning

Iran wasnt going to be a nation with a nuke, it was going to be a church with a nuke. Huge difference.

Edit post

#33 •••
@SatanLucy

@#30

Danger of Oil prices rising,

Argument that Iran is more dangerous for America to attack compared to when we attacked Iraq in the past.


Well, I suppose it 'might anger American consumers if oil rises.

I am uneducated on the military strengths of Iraq and Iran in history and current day.


Britain didn't seem to have much trouble with the Argentina,

I 'think Argentina had a 'weak military.

But I recall reading how their planes were just a 'bit older than those of the British, and that seemed to make a 'huge difference.

. . The more tech has developed, the more 'small differences in tech has been magnified I 'think.

So I am thinking America could still stomp Iran with ease.

But I am uneducated on Iran military, or military in general.


Assuming America can stomp Iran's military, there is question of what next?

'Possibility of revolution.

Possibility of Iran fracturing.

Lot of trouble, lot of suffering, seems likely.

. . . . Iran has a lot of neighbors, neighbors are not always friends, they might eat Iran territory a bit.

. . . .


What do we risk by 'not attacking Iran?

Future troubles maybe, that maybe we can avoid by attacking now.

. . . Though I admit we may be making future troubles if we attack now.

. . .


Edit post

#34 •••
@Shoresy

Are all nations not churches?

Edit post

#35 •••
@Leaning

Nope, most churches are suicide cults. Nations are the opposite and worship self-preservation.

Edit post

#36 •••
@Shoresy

Hm, I don't think I consider most churches suicide cults.


People/Nations have 'values is what I mean by calling them Churches though.

Even 'Atheists end up ascribing to some sort of values and creeds.

. . .


I admire Crusaders, though I dislike it when they conscript people into their Crusades.

Crusaders being in my view, people who effort their morality and values into the world I mean.

Though I suppose people can be isolationist in their values.

Edit post

#37 •••
@Leaning

I take it you didn't know Iran was under a brutal Theocracy.

Edit post

#38 •••
@Shoresy

I am and was aware of that,

. . . I suppose I just find "church with a nuke" a bit vague in meaning.

Hm.

"Nations are the opposite and worship self-preservation."


I suppose the meaning to be an argument that people with Strong and High Ideological beliefs beyond Selfishness, Survival, Money, can be a bit unpredictable?

. . . Eh, been a lot of Selfish countries in history that invaded other countries.


Edit post

#39 •••
@Leaning

The defining feature of any nation is preservation, usually under the holy trinity of language, borders, and culture


The defining feature of a Church is preparation for the afterlife.


This is why Nations do not generally allow Churches to possess nuclear bombs.

Edit post

#40 •••
@Shoresy

Interesting perspective.



Edit post

#41 •••

Iran’s leader was killed in the bomb strikes. Wonder if the war will take a unexpected turn now?

Edit post

#42 •••
@SatanLucy

Do you honestly think Iran will keep fighting a war they cant win? The usa doesnt want to keep fighting so the only way the war continues is for Iran to keep fighting. Your theory on this point might be true if they simply turn into a nation of terrorists cause i couldnt see a sane country trying to fight a war that no one wants and that only ovliterates their country. Is that your theory that a country of terrorists is rising?

Edit post

#43 •••

You're focused on Iran, strategically, the war has little to do with Iran, the primary strategic goals are threefold:


1) Control the news cycle, specifically, distract attention from the Epstein fiasco.

2) Allow Trump to escalate his crackdown on dissent.

3) Further consolidate power within the executive branch, subjugate congressional authority.


His Supreme Court immunized the President from criminal charges for official misconduct, which allows him to ignore the law in the process of

establishing an autocracy. Attacking Iran is simply a means to an end, what happens in Iran is relatively inconsequential to Trump and his agenda.

Edit post

#44 •••
@Sidewalker

Maybe, and maybe not.

It's not as if US and Iran interactions have only 'suddenly happened.

Been going on for years.

Edit post

#45 •••
@Leaning

Same old shit and hypocrisy.


We never learn or get any better.

Edit post

#46 •••
@Sidewalker
The Epstein fiasco


Epstein should be a hero in your country at this point. If it wasn't for Epstein and his almighty files, those 2 dictators would still be alive.

Edit post

#47 •••
@Leaning
Maybe, and maybe not.
It's not as if US and Iran interactions have only 'suddenly happened.
Been going on for years.


Yes, it has been going on for years and when it comes to what Donald Trump is thinking, accusations are confessions.


In 2011, 12, and 13, he repeatedly insisted that President Barack Obama was going to start a war with Iran in order to help his political prospects, in order to get re-elected. Of course he was wrong, Obama did not start a war with Iran, Trump had no insight into Obama’s mind, all he was really telling us is what He would do if he were President. Well, now he is President, and he’s facing political disaster in this year’s elections, and he has already confessed that he believes that starting a way with Iran would have a positive political effect domestically, and he desperately needs to do something about his disastrous polls and the coming Blue Tsunami.


Trump doesn’t comprehend the intricacies of Middle Eastern politics, his staff doesn’t either, he doesn’t even care about it, what he does know and care about is domestic politics. Trump isn't thinking about how bombing Iran will affect Iran, as always, he's only thinking about how it will affect him,


Trump isn’t playing four-dimensional chess here; it’s just Trump being Trump.


Edit post

#48 •••
@linate

Yeah, Iran will keep fighting. In fact, they just said they are about to "plow Israel".

Edit post

#49 •••

Three US service members killed in Iran operation as Israeli rescuers say nine dead in Iran strike


https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn5ge95q6y7t

Edit post

#50 •••
@SatanLucy

That is just the beginning. More casualties to follow.

Edit post

#51 •••
@Debby

Yep, like I said before somewhere, it won't be quite as Hollywood as Venezuela.

Edit post

#52 •••
@SergeantLynch

It’s has a better developed military than Venezuela. They also have battle experience having fought a 9 year war with Iraq.

Edit post

#53 •••
@SatanLucy

3 and 9 dead? OK that's just too many deaths, let them all get back to business as usual. I have a McHappy Meal to eat here.

Edit post

#54 •••

That is an almost inhuman response to the war tragedy.

Edit post

#55 •••
@Debby

How can something so expected be so tragic...War and conflict is all about killing and death...Always has been.


Hey, but the Yanks blew up a girls school...Cool fucking dudes.

Edit post

#56 •••
@SergeantLynch

To be fair, Twin Towers had a daycare in it too. Didn't stop shit. I really don't know of a time anywhere on the globe in all of history when the presence of children prevented attacks.


Back to the real concern, my McHappy meal.

nom nom

Edit post

#57 •••
@Shoresy

Is that a Canadian Sunday lunch.


And true...Collateral damage is what it is and cannot be guaranteed to be age specific.


Though it was Afghani goat herders that took the hit for the Twin Towers.


And Mrs Sergeant Lynch is away, so my Sunday lunch was somewhat scrappy today.

Edit post

#58 •••
@SergeantLynch

This time you will be successful providing a stool sample.

Edit post

#59 •••
@Debby

Oooooo yes. Scrappy, but a good healthy high fibre diet nonetheless.


Stools a go go.


And I expect that there are people shitting themselves all over the place at the moment thanks to Donald, Benjamin et al.


And of course, our dick brained leadership hasn't got the balls to say no.

Edit post

#60 •••
@SergeantLynch

But the war in Iran is going well. The stocks have recovered from the initial shock.

Edit post