Did someone somewhere say that "air superiority" meant that no losses in arial combat would ever be sustained?

Started by fauxlaw

Replies
2
Posts
3
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••
🔗 Link

Did someone somewhere with actual combat experience ever say that "air superiority" meant that no losses in arial combat would ever be sustained?


If you believe that, you have no such experience, nor have ever been close to it. You're completely hoodwinked by typical radical media, or lol-professional-types in DC who believe anything, anywhere, anytime, and insist they have credentials for such opinions. Someone like Hilarious Balloon Girl, An Occasional Cortex, Don [sour]Lemon, or Maxine Waters. Oh, and Eric Swallowell.


"Air superiority" by the numbers, means only that there's >50% odds you will not suffer losses. But, airhead, woke radicals believe only extremes.

Edit comment

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#2 •••
🔗 Link

Nope, nobody anywhere said that, but two of our jets were shot down AFTER somebody named Donald Trump told the American public that Iran no longer had the ability to shoot down our planes.


Anyone who believed that was completely hoodwinked by typical Trump bald faced lies.



Edit post

#3 •••
🔗 Link
@Sidewalker

A lot of Americans are easily hoodwinked by bald faced lies, Top Gun and Tom Cruise.


So much so that no one is particularly interested in Artemis...Didn't even get a mention on the homepage this morning.


Are they there yet?


Have they returned?


Did they bring me back a stick of Moonrock?

Edit post