Hey! New articles of Impeachment against Trump! What else isn't new?

In terms of the charade that is currently US politics, impeachment is meaningless drivel.

Sadly now, only a bullet will suffice.

Maybe Mr Vance possesses a modicum of common decency and respect for the US constitution.

Yes, we all know the bullet is the ultimate destroyer of democracy. Historically speaking, of course.

How can you hate a five-year-old in a bunny hat, and love a pedophile President?

BTW, this week marked the 57th anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King, what did you do to celebrate?

Well, what is democracy other than a lower grade of tyranny?

Or a lower velocity bullet?

True, wouldn't want a through and through that inadvertently took out Pete Hegseth as well...Would you?

Like I said, the USA can just hand over the 90% uranium since a Shiite missile can already reach Downing Street. That's a faster bullet to speed up evolution.

He also faces violating his own House Rules in levying articles of impeachment in the first place, but even Nancy Pelostomy, in Trump's first term, issued articles of impeachment in violation of House Rules she, herself, ratified in the 116th and 117th Congress.

Tell me again what the rule is for supreme court justices being nominated and confirmed in presidential election years?

Your attempts to frame democrats as being hypocritical and unserious on this issue are frankly, pathetic. Just days ago Trump threatened to wipe out an entire civilization if they didn't meet his deadline on negotiations over a war he has repeatedly claimed we already won. If Joe Biden had ever done that you would have lost your fucking mind and been calling for his immediate removal, and you know it. So if you want to call out hypocrisy start in the mirror.

They did call for his removal. Sometime around 2024.

But I don't recall exactly who exactly whispered in Biden's ear to resign. So it might not be hypocrisy.

What are you talking about?

Trump threatened to wipe out an entire civilization

Sure, but what is "civilization?" It may not be what you think it means, and there are a few definitions, almost none of which reduce a people to the Stone Age. I know we have the capability to render Iran as a glass expanse, but Trump is far better civilized than that. Your language would suggest that is your suggested lack of civilization - people and their land as glass. We're made of sterner stuff than that, and, knowong Trump is relatively well read, I don't think he thinks your definition is valid. So, before I proceed further, do that. Define your "civilization."