Hands

ODS again

At least I'll admit it. Yes, Oba'a made me deranged. "I will fundamentally change America," Oba'a said in his 2008 campaign. Since the Constitution is the foundation of America, those are fighting words.

According to reports, William T. Kelley, a late marketing professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, reportedly described Donald Trump as the "dumbest goddamn student I ever had". This comment was recounted by Frank DiPrima, a friend of Kelley, who claimed the professor said it many times.

It is my considered opinion that what professors think of students is mostly irrelevant, but I imagine that if Kelley thought that of Trump, it's mostly rooted in the grades Kelley imposed on the man just but spite rather than. by legitimate grading because, clearly Kelley dislike this student. Doesn't say much for him, either.. The reverse is also true; students can dislike teachers. It is in my case for some of my professors. In Kelley's case, I know nothing of Kelley's politics, nor, for that matter, his academic acumen other than that he was a university professor of marketing, of whom there are very good ones and very poor ones in any discipline. But marketing is, in industry, mostly a matter, first, of putting down the competition rather than justifying one's own true excellence, if it exists.

"He who can, does. He who cannot, teaches."

-Shaw

And I wonder if G.B. was looking in the mirror when that thought hit him?

Sadly, those who cannot never predicted those who can to produce teaching machines.

Then, what the hell was Einstein [a can-do] doing at Yale to meet with, among other students, my father, to enlighten them [a teaching exercise, after all], my friend, and Albert spent a good portion of his later life doing exactly that. Maybe G.B.Shaw never met him, or anyone like him, and I do not appreciate anyone who belittles teaching, G.B. included. Am I to think none of his plays taught anyone anything? Seems he was only talking about himself, and maybe he was a self-depricating son of a Bernard. [read -itch]

"I will fundamentally change America," Oba'a said in his 2008 campaign. Since the Constitution is the foundation of America, those are fighting words.

If those are fighting words, because by squinting hard enough you can kind of imagine a way to translate what he said into "I'm going to terminate parts of the constitution", I can only imagine how badly you will lose your mind to find out that Trump literally, explicitly, called for the termination of parts of the constitution.

Trump literally, explicitly, called for the termination 

I know that is a popular refrain among wokenesses who have little regard for more complicated grammatical structure, and you obviously missed it. No, Trump did not call for termination of the Constitution, not in part nor in whole. The entire commentary is clearly preceded by a conditional introduction that most of the media missed entirely. I have a PhD in English Lit. I am familiar with the syntax of my mother tongue, and its lexicon. Conditional set-up is not common, but does have its purpose, and Trump used it well, and none of it was a factual suggestion that such alleged dismissal was is politics. Sorry to disappoint, but the language is there to be read in the complete transcript, void off the added, non -Trump language applied by the media.

"I will fundamentally change America," Oba'a said in his 2008 campaign. Since the Constitution is the foundation of America, those are fighting words.

That's an idiotic statement born of severe ODS, is it your contention that the country has not made any fundamental changes in 237 years? The Constitution has frozen the country in time, we are a static country because of the Constitution? Nonsense.

Get real, it isn't what Obama said that upsets you, it is his race that makes you angry, "black president" are your fighting words.

The country has fundamentally changed, especially regarding diversity, that upsets you because you and your white supremacist values are a thing of the past, you and your MAGA movement are dinosaurs that can't adapt to a changing world, and like the dinosaurs, you will go extinct, and for the same reason the dinosaurs did, because you have brains the size of walnuts.

Then, what the hell was Einstein [a can-do] doing at Yale to meet with, among other students, my father, to enlighten them [a teaching exercise, after all], my friend, and Albert spent a good portion of his later life doing exactly that. 

It's fucking amazing how completely full of shit you are.

First of all, Einstein didn't do anything a Yale, he never held any position at Yale, he was at Princeton University you idiot.

He emigrated to the US in 1933 and joined the Institute for Advanced Study in PRINCETON, where he remained till his death in 1955. The Institute for Advance Study is a research center for theoretical study; it has never been a teaching university. Einstein never taught classes in the US, so he never actually had "students", he did conduct some lectures, but it is completely uninformed to say "Albert spent a good portion of his later life" teaching, he never "taught" a class in the US and so, he never had a student in the US.

Your father was not a student of Einstein's anywhere, especially not Yale LOL, that is just more of your bullshit.

No, Trump did not call for termination of the Constitution, not in part nor in whole. The entire commentary is clearly preceded by a conditional introduction

Oh really... Let's take a closer look at that to see if it holds up under any level of rational scrutiny. Here is the entire truth social post:

So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109449803240069864

First thing to note is that this is not even a conditional statement, as in if X then throw out the constitution. He's already asserting X so he is in fact unequivocally calling for the constitution to be set to the side. That's your supposed red line with Obama, but somehow doesn't apply to Trump. Shocking.

Second, the election wasn't stolen. So at best, you can argue the man is totally delusional. Kind of odd that you are still attacking Obama while we have a delusional Commander in Cheif.

Third, this is Trump's tired old game and he does this with everything. You act like it's some kind of grammatical genius, but this is really simple; Trump has figured out that if you can just lie, you can make an excuse to take any action you want. It's really simple; "I want to do B. If A then B. [Lie about] A, therefore B". It's exactly what he's done with the DOJ, lie about democrats weaponizing it so he can excuse himself weaponizing it, and he's trying to do exactly that here.

The man doesn't care about the constitution or democracy and he never has, that's been made plainly obvious.

So, I challenged you to go find his address that was posted to read in its entirety, and you, instead, pull up short tweet. Go toTrumop's full posted commentary. It's available to access if you want to try to read his entire message. Your post isn't it. I haven't provided the convenient link because I want you to do the research yourself, just as I had to do.

In post #3 you argued that Obama saying "I will fundamentally change America," somehow = "I will change the constitution", which you claimed was red line for you.

Well I just showed you Trump advocating, in writing, in a post meant to be consumed by the entire country, for the termination of our constitution.

If you had an ounce of intellectual honesty, you would give that far more weight than Obama's coded language you had to translate.

But you don't. So what do you do instead? Pretend the post I provided right here in front of your face and linked you right to, which he never took down btw, doesn't exist, and then point to some other instance of him saying something else and pretend it's my responsibility to go find it so I can explain to you how it doesn't refute my original point.

The intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy is remarkable.

The intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy is remarkable.

Show me the law that forbids ids questioning the results of an election. Show me that, please. I want to see the verbiage that disallows questioning election results. If you cannot [and you cannot, I know, already such statutory language does not exist] there is no "intellectual dishonesty" by Trump. He did not advocate dismissing the Constitution in the tweet you cited; he said that a fraudulent election [he believes it was, and is legally allowed to have and express that opinion by the 1A] can allow the constitutional language to be terminated by preference for fraud. Big difference from what Oba'a said.

Considering that Biden had 2023 rally attendees counted in the tens [remember his covid circles six-feet apart?], while Trump's [with no circles] were in tens of thousands, I question how Biden allegedly won.

My #18 reference to "...2023 rally attendees counted in the tens..." should have been "2020 really..."

Sorry for the typo. No election in 2023. No president, then, either, but in name, only, and that is sorrowful.