Clearly, neither party has done this in 200 years in any state.... not sure why you want to jump to partisan propaganda on this, it doesn't move the needle.
The legislation you posted isn't remotely as accommodating as a statewide holiday. They technically give access, but in practice, they’re nothing like a real state-wide holiday off.
First, you’re squeezed into a narrow window. like maybe 1–3 hours, often at the employer’s convenience. You're basically being asked to fit a civic duty into a lunch break. A holiday gives you control of the entire day, which means you can avoid lines, go when you want, and not rush. And this is the big reason of my OP, voting should take at least an entire day to think about the importance of something that could last a decade or more.
The legislation is highly conditional when employers can say you already have enough time before or after your shift, so you don’t qualify. A statewide holiday removes that gatekeeping. You may have to request time, give notice, or even take it unpaid. Every extra step drops participation. A holiday has zero friction, you just go vote. So yeah, those laws keep the system legally covered, but they’re nowhere near the same as accommodating as an actual state-wide holiday....