Trump will be removed from office before 2029

Started by Double_R

Replies
82
Posts
83
Page
3 / 3

Conversation

#61 •••
@Shoresy
Clearly, a person needs high mental faculties to sustain a 12-year trolling streak among his devout TDS haters.


Right, because everybody knows internet trolls are the brightest among us.


This is your brain on MAGA.

Edit post

#62 •••
@Double_R

Certainly brighter than the trollees. Not that this is a high bar at all to clear these days.

Edit post

#63 •••
@Shoresy
Certainly brighter than the trollees.


Right, because speaking out angrily against a president of the United States who decides to use the weight of the office we elected him into to troll the nation is really a sign of a lack of intelligence.


Do you ever hear yourself? Don't answer, we all know you don't.

Edit post

#64 •••
@Double_R

You would think an orange octagenarian would run out of different buttons to push, but he makes new ones up daily. That's impressive.


Edit post

#65 •••
@Double_R
we elected him


Oh, you did? Interesting.

Edit post

#66 •••
@Double_R
jeapordy


...is committing to an oath, such as "First, do no harm," and then do so even verbally.


The Goldwater Rule


Have you read it? These "experts" did not, or ignored it. Violation of ethics. AccusingTrump of doing so, when doing it one's self, well, smells like a hippo.


...concerned about him. 


very funny.





Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#67 •••
@Shoresy

Yes. Here, he is pushing the button in support of the 1A, to address grievances, in spite of making idiots of ourselves doing it. Hint to the angry mob: He didn't write it. They need to go shout at the Document behind glass that is down the road.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#68 •••

Journalist and cultural critic H.L. Mencken made his famous, cynical prediction about the future of the American presidency in a column for the Baltimore Evening Sun on July 26, 1920. He suggested that as democracy perfects itself, the office will become an increasingly accurate reflection of the "inner soul" of the public.

The core of his prediction was that as democracy progresses, the White House will eventually be occupied by a "downright moron," reflecting the "inner soul of the people".

Edit post

#69 •••
@FLRW

You guys will never have a perfect democracy if your Constitution has anything to say about it.

Edit post

#70 •••
@Double_R
Do you ever hear yourself?


You can keep your echo chamber; I see no value in it.

Edit post

#71 •••
@Shoresy
You would think an orange octagenarian would run out of different buttons to push, but he makes new ones up daily. That's impressive.


Glad you find his ability to troll impressive. I prefer a president who acts like a grown up and cares about the well being of the people he governs.


But hey, you're free to prioritize whatever you value most.

Edit post

#72 •••
@fauxlaw
Have you read it? These "experts" did not, or ignored it. Violation of ethics. AccusingTrump of doing so, when doing it one's self, well, smells like a hippo.


Yeah... The predictable throw away response - pretending I didn't just explain why this overly simplistic point you're making is total bullshit and just repeating your original talking points.


If you have no arguments against the points I made you could always just not respond at all.

Edit post

#73 •••
@Double_R
I prefer a president who acts like a grown up and cares about the well being of the people he governs.


So why did you type "We elected him" if you didn't prefer him?


As I said, it's normally a very low bar to troll people who already chose to hate you 12 years ago and counting. But Trump has no cognitive problem controlling his devout enemies with their chosen hate. 12 straight years, and getting better with time.

Edit post

#74 •••
@Shoresy
So why did you type "We elected him" if you didn't prefer him?


Because the "we" in that sentence is referring to the American people to which I am a part of genius.


As I said, it's normally a very low bar to troll people who already chose to hate you 12 years ago and counting.


What we chose to hate is the total denigration of everything we used to agree our political leadership was supposed to embody - Maturity, intelligence, civility, seriousness, decency, etc. Remember when Bill Clinton got impeached for lying about a blow job, because republicans argued we needed to "cleanse the sanctity of the office".


Yet now we have a president who is childish, ignorant, petulant, vile, self serving - all in the extreme. He's also a pathological liar, a conspiracy theorist, and a narcissist. If you don't take serious issue with that then there's genuinely something wrong with you.

Edit post

#75 •••
@Double_R
Because the "we" in that sentence is referring to the American people to which I am a part of genius.


So you helped elect him as part of the "we Americans who elected"


So interesting. You definitely had everyone here fooled.

Edit post

#76 •••

The USA has become the dumbest country on Earth.

The importance of literacy cannot be overstated. Being able to read and write allows us to stay up to date on current events, communicate effectively, and comprehend the issues that shape our society. Yet, according to the Barbara Bush Foundation, 54 percent of U.S. adults aged 16 to 74, or roughly 130 million individuals, are illiterate, reading at or below a sixth-grade level.

Edit post

#77 •••
@Shoresy
So you helped elect him as part of the "we Americans who elected"

So interesting. You definitely had everyone here fooled.


Yeah, I helped him by voting against him. What awesome logic.


You're entirely too stupid to talk to.

Edit post

#78 •••
@Double_R

So you didn't vote for him? Then why all the fake outrage about the "we Americans who elected"...why lie? Especially on the anonymous internet, where lying doesn't gain you anything.

Edit post

#79 •••
@Double_R

Oh, but I do have a response; it just hasn't penetrated yet. There's a 2020 "documentary" titled "Unfit; The Psychology of Donald Trump,"

directed by Dan Partland, in which at least 4 psychologists/Psychiatrists and an attorney gave advice that they allege Trump is unfit due to mental disability. Yes, the documentary participants acknowledge the Goldwater Rule, and even added the result of a trial in the 90s from which these "experts" developed "The Tarasoff Rule," to wit, "impose a duty on therapists to warn appropriate person[s] when a patient may present a risk of harm [to others]." One of the "experts," Dr. Johyn Gartner, PhD, a psychologist, admitted "Donald Trump is not my patient" yet agrees with the Tarasoff Rule. Just violated the commentary of the documentary. I am not an MD, a psychologist, or a psychiatrist, but I can see a conspiracy when it is that obvious. So much for oaths. Do me a favor. Look up what a "patient," and, apparently, these "experts" do not know what a patient is [i.e., needs a personal consultation, not just observin by remote]


Patient

Medical Context (Noun)

In healthcare, a patient is typically a person or animal awaiting or undergoing medical attention from a doctor, dentist, or surgeon.\

  1. Etymology: The word stems from the Latin patiens, which means "I am suffering". Historically, this implied that the individual passively accepted the treatments prescribed by providers.
  2. Modern Role: Today, patients are encouraged to be active participants in shared decision-making regarding their care rather than passive recipients.


Just to be clear, these "experts" fill a "role" wherein the "patient," Donald Trump, is only a passive recipient. Ain't the way medical treatment works today. Get it?


Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#80 •••
@fauxlaw

This is a tired and dishonest tactic that's getting really old - you start by pretending we're in an arena that we're not just so you can impose an unreasonable and irrelevant standard, them apply that irrelevant standard to the example at hand, then declare that because it doesn't meet your impossible standard the whole thing is vapid and should be disregarded.


You guys do the same thing everytime Trump does something clearly illegal - pretend this is a court of law so you can apply courtroom standards, then when we fail to prove Trump is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt that means we should all disregard his activity. Same thing.


Here, you are pretending we're in the medical field giving a medical diagnoses, just so you can declare that we didn't meet medical guidelines, therefore we can dismiss everything these people have to say about his mental state and toss their expertise in the trash.


Here in reality, the fact is that Donald Trump is obviously mentally unfit for the job, and medical experts everywhere can easily identify the tells in which he shows us just how unfit he is. Any rational person gets this, no matter how many logic pretzels you twist yourself into in order to dismiss it.


And like I said before, your only out is too presume it's all pretend, like we're watching WWE and he's just playing a character. That's every bit as bad.

Edit post

#81 •••
@Double_R
Here, you are pretending we're in the medical field


Pretending? No, no pretense here. This is a medical issue for which Trump is being diagnosed by assumed experts. Experts who should know, because they have been trained and sworn to an oath not to diagnose without personal consultation with the patient. None of them can claim him as a patient.

period.


You may pretend all you wish, but acknowledge, please, that oaths mean things.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#82 •••
@fauxlaw
This is a medical issue for which Trump is being diagnosed by assumed experts.


It's not a diagnoses. I already explained that to you, multiple times in fact. You don't get it because you don't want to. It's not complicated.


If your car was acting up and you called your cousin who is a mechanic, Told them what was happening and he told you what he thought was the issue, you would probably trust his assessment more than your own. That doesn't mean he gave you an actual diagnoses of the car, he would need to see it with his own eyes for that, bit you'd recognize that his expertise is valuable and would regards it as such.


This is the same exact thing, no matter how much you try to pretend it's not.


they have been trained and sworn to an oath not to diagnose without personal consultation


The oath they took did not factor a president of the United States so clearly and dangerously unfit for office. Circumstances change, if you are actually judging them you would factor that. But you're MAGA, so you isolate only the parts that work in Trumps favor and ignore the rest.

Edit post

#83 •••
@Double_R

Don’t rule Trump out. His influence is far reaching.

Edit post