⚠️ This post has been marked as offensive.
Men can't get abortions though. So if not getting an abortion is a test of morality, men aren't being tested in the first place.
I believe women are more likely to support abortion being legal, but then they're more likely to be in a position to want one, which probably skews the results. If men were in a similar position they might be more likely to support it as well.
It's a bit like saying Germans are bad cause more of them were Nazis. If it's skewed by outside influences, then I think it's moral luck.
There's a school of thought akin to determinism that says everything is moral luck, but I think there's a difference between your brain's decision making process and outside influences that are separate from it.
I bet my 7 year old cousin who died from leukemia wished he was aborted.
Maybe some murderer was in circumstances I wasn't in, but still it doesn't make him same as me.
Cause on an individual level the circumstances aren't the most significant factor. Once you start aggregating people based on gender, biological circumstances are now the primary factor you're studying.
Do you think 7 year olds with leukemia should be killed?
Well, God does.
7 year olds cannot be aborted...Similarly children are not aborted...Though children can be murdered.
So your simplistic argument is too simplistic, not taking into account the many facets of the human social and physiological condition.
Murder being a variable concept...Just like most similar concepts that tend to fall under the general heading of morals and ethics.
After all, overthink is what it is to be distinguishably human...So "abortion is murder" never addresses the broader aspects of the issue.
Abortion tends to be the cessation of gamete fusion and/or cellular division by choice, relative to a raft of socio-economic considerations.
So Lucy unless you can explain the purpose of everything...Or even more so, prove that there is a purpose to everything; then abortion remains to be a moral travesty for some or a practical solution for others.
Saying men can't do evil isn't really saying men do evil.
It's a specific type of evil though. Like people in wheelchairs are less likely to beat people to death, don't think that means being paralyzed makes you a better person necessarily.
It's just a clump of cells hindering a woman's choice.
-excerpt from Woke Kampf
So it is.
Though the bigger the clump the bigger the issue...And rightly so in my book.
And it really is a woman thing...Also in my book.
Population up to 8.41 billion now.
So nothing to worry about Lucy.
Just think what the population would be if it weren't for mortality.
Men will have the right to choose AI wombs and make their own clumps of cells to kill as they see fit.
Well, population has to do with the perpetuation of the species...Perhaps for a reason or perhaps for no reason...No one knows.
And "innocent" means what?
Innocent is a legal term, or a bit of a heart string tugger when arguing against pregnancy termination or eating meat...So a human thought construct, that as far as we know has no greater universal significance.
Or eating the meat of a pregnancy termination.
45% of women will be the victim of sexual assault, so men win the evil contest by a 20% margin.
25% of girls and 5% of boys will experience child sexual abuse before reaching adulthood, so pedophiles get the prize for "most evil".
Yes, is offal popular in Canada.
Flash fried, lightly seasoned, and served with a walnut salad, drizzled with olive oil.
A nice crisp fruity white to cleanse the palate before the sweet course.
Yes, including circumcision...I absolutely agree.
One cannot be picky and choosey when it comes to sexually motivated child abuse.
Though that's the thing, humans are selectively moralistic when needs must.
More crimes are committed by men than women. There are more men in jail than women.
Yes, basic needs must...Sex drive and hunter gathering...Whereas women nurture.
Of course, long since over thought, but nonetheless still fundamental.
They need more women in the Supreme Court to keep a check on the male judges.
Yes, the trouble with a hierarchical system is the inevitability of the system relative to human falibility.
So why are women worse than men despite being better examples?