Fallacies of the Democratic Socialists of America, Part 13

Started by fauxlaw

Replies
6
Posts
7
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••

"Socialist feminism fights for queer liberation and the freedoms of all working class women. Stop gender violence and end policies that oppress bodily autonomy and intimate life, including patriarchal restrictions on abortion, childbirth and childraising [sic], gender expression and transition, marriage, and divorce. Ban sex discrimination and ensure fair compensation and support for all forms of labor, including care work" - DSA https://program.dsausa.org/  


How is "feminism" suddenly "queer?" And why not also fight for masculism? Yes, I acknowledge homosexuality and lesbianism. These terms are already sexually specific identifying male and female, respectively. It's curious that LGBTQ+ does not directly acknowledge F and M in its alphabet. If the fight for feminism is needed, so is masculism. This was already Identified in Part 11. Among its findings is the following:


"The Y chromosome, along with the X chromosome, is often discussed for its role in sexual development. While these chromosomes play a central role, the factors involved in human sexual development are spread across the genome and very complex, giving rise to the array of human sex characteristics found among male, female and intersex individuals. These categories are not equivalent to gender, which is a social category." https://www.genome.gov/news/news-release/researchers-assemble-the-first-complete-sequence-of-a-human-y-chromosome


Given this complexity, it is impossible with today's technology to determine the percentage of individuals who express "intersex." One certain thing: exacting science is currently unable to quantify the percentage of those affected simply because the whole population of humanity worldwide has not been tested for anything. The whim of personal choice of identification is not going to be accurate, either. Social, as opposed to science, is going to continue to be at odds. Best not to impose suggested legislation until the science is clearer than it is today, to at least achieve proper statistical accuracy, which is ±2% at 95% confidence.


One wonders why "abortion, childbirth, and childraising" [sic] ought to be combined together in any conversation. Regardless of socialist attitudes, abortion is meant to end pregnancy, prevent childbirth and thus prevent parenthood. "Planned Parenthood" is one of the leading organizations dedicated to advising troubled pregnant females to abort, thus ending parenthood as a possible outcome of pregnancy. These are attitudes that defy the terminology used to advance the socialist agenda. Is that sensible?


For "sex discrimination," the discussion is as disjointed as the discussion of race discrimination in Part 12, above. "Sex discrimination and... fair compensation" is already documented by current statutory law and policy. It is the same problem as race described in Part 12; an individual, not a systemic problem.


Edit comment

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#2 •••
And why not also fight for masculism?


Probably because 'masculism' enjoys a privileged status in our society.


One wonders why "abortion, childbirth, and childraising" [sic] ought to be combined together in any conversation.


One apparently doesnt comprehend family planning can be deliberate.


Sex discrimination and... fair compensation" is already documented by current statutory law and policy.


And yet, the problems persist.



Edit post

Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. - Christopher Hitchens

#3 •••
@SkepticalOne

Sexual discrimination is a major issue in America. It is happening even before women have established their rights.

Edit post

#4 •••
Sexual discrimination is a major issue in America.

Yes ma'am.

Edit post

Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. - Christopher Hitchens

#5 •••
@SkepticalOne

That is why Trump is deporting criminals and rapists.

Edit post

#6 •••
@Debby

So goes the narrative. In reality, approximately 70% of people in ICE detention and those removed do not have any criminal convictions.

Edit post

Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way. - Christopher Hitchens

#7 •••
@SkepticalOne

This might be his plan to get deported since he is a convicted criminal and his wife and child subject to immigration laws.

Edit post