I deny science and logic. I dont believe that these things exist.
A lot of people come to me and say:
"Logic determines what is true"
"Science determines what is true"
"Observations determine what is true"
To that, I reply:
"No, Meowbah determines what is true."
But here, we must reach into a deep area of philosophy, or as I like to call it, Meow-philosopher.
First question is: "What determines something to be true?"
Some people might say "Logic determines what is true."
But such claim is a self defeating claim, because how do you prove it?
If you say "Logic determines that its true that "logic determines what is true",
You encounter two problems. First is obvious circular reasoning. Second problem is infinite regress, where you just made another claim which you need to prove, and if you try to prove it using logic, you are merely making one more claim which needs to be proved. For each claim you need to prove true, another needs to be made which proves it true, but that demands another proof and so on to infinity.
Science and observations face exactly same problem.
"Observation determines what is true"
What makes this claim true then?
"Observation determined that its true that "observation determines what is true"".
What makes this claim true?
No matter how you structure your arguments regarding what determines truth, you encounter infinite regress or circularity.
And I can merely respond with symmetry:
"Meowbah determines what is true".
And use exact same argument you use to prove mine.
However, symmetry is broken by the fact that Meowbah is God, so she can break infinite regress with her infinite power, where science and logic of humans cannot.
