Don Lemon legitimately charged for violating 18 U.S. Code § 248 - Freedom of access to clinic entrances [and religious services]

Started by fauxlaw

Replies
3
Posts
4
Page
1 / 1

Conversation

#1 •••

Don Lemon was legitimately charged for violating 18 U.S. Code § 248 - Freedom of access to clinic entrances [and religious services], to wit:


18 U.S. Code § 248 - Freedom of access to clinic entrances


(a) Prohibited Activities.—Whoever—


(1) by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person because that person is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons from, obtaining or providing reproductive health services;


(2) by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; or


(3) intentionally damages or destroys the property of a facility, or attempts to do so, because such facility provides reproductive health services, or intentionally damages or destroys the property of a place of religious worship,


shall be subject to the penalties provided in subsection (b) and the civil remedies provided in subsection (c), except that a parent or legal guardian of a minor shall not be subject to any penalties or civil remedies under this section for such activities insofar as they are directed exclusively at that minor.


bold / italics used for emphasis


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/248





Edit comment

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#2 •••
@fauxlaw

Don Lemon was released without bail. It was an intimidating tactic but it failed. Don lemon defended his first amendment right.

Edit post

#3 •••

Yes, Lemon was released from jail, but is still faces federal charges for violation of the statute I cited: FACE Act. What 1A right? He has the right to make an ass of himself. Actually, his ass is still intact, but it still must face the court.

Edit post

We tell God what to do and then blame Him for our errors.

- Dr. Pet Dragon of Sorbonne University

#4 •••
@fauxlaw

If he was guilty he would have been charged or under house arrest. He was released without bail.

Edit post