P1. Existence can only be conditional or unconditional
P2. If existence is unconditional, then everything exists, including God.
P3. If existence is conditional, conditions for existence are essentially same as God in power, thus God
C. God exists in both possible cases.
Conditional existence talks of "existing only if some condition happens"
Unconditional existence talks of "existing independently of any if conditions"
Because 3rd option doesnt exist, any individual thing can only have its "existence" dependent on some condition, or independent of any condition. there is no 3rd option here.
But when applied to existence generally, we end up with result that only two options are possible:
One, there are conditions which control all what will exist and what wont,
two, there are no such conditions, and thus, each possible thing has independent existence.
One is basically God.
two, likewise means God exists because each possible thing exists.
to better understand two, basic definition deduction is necessary.
P1. If no thing is required for existence, then everything exists
P2. No thing is required for existence
C. Everything exists.
to put it simply, this argument talks of what is needed for existence.
P1. Existence of a possible thing requires something or it doesnt require anything in order to happen
P2. If existence of a possible thing requires something, that "something" is essentially God
P3. If existence of a possible thing doesnt require anything in order to happen, then all possible things exist, including God
this argument explores what is required for a specific thing to exist in the first place. If nothing is required, then all things exist, including God. If something is required, that something is essentially God.